Effects of Social Media on Consumer Information Seeking and Purchase Intention of Oral Health Care Products Among Adults

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Wilson D,
   2. Lin X,
   3. Longstreet P,
   4. Sarker S.

   Web 2.0: a definition, literature review, and directions for future research [Internet]. In: A Renaissance of Information Technology for Sustainability and Global Competitiveness; 2011 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: ]https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2011_submissions/368/
2. 2.↵
   1. Khan MF,
   2. Jan A.

   A measure of social media marketing: scale development and validation. J Bus Res. 2019 Dec;8(2):158-68.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. Erkan I,
   2. Evans C.

   The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Comput Human Behav. 2016 Feb;61:47-55.

   OpenUrl
4. 4.↵
   1. Jia X,
   2. Pang Y,
   3. Liu LS.

   Online health information seeking behavior: a systematic review. Healthc. 2021 Dec;9(12):1740.

   OpenUrl
5. 5.↵
   1. Neely S,
   2. Eldredge C,
   3. Sanders R.

   Health information seeking behaviors on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic among American social networking site users: survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun;23(6):e29802.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. 6.↵
   Auxier B, Social media use in 2021[Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center: 2021 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/
7. 7.↵
   1. de Oliveira Santini F,
   2. Ladeira WJ,
   3. Pinto DC, et al.

   Customer engagement in social media: a framework and meta-analysis. J Acad Mark Sci. 2020 Nov;48(6):1211-28.

   OpenUrl
8. 8.↵
   1. Awan U

   1. Mason AN,
   2. Narcum J,
   3. Mason K.

   Social media marketing gains importance after Covid-19. Awan U, ed. Cogent Bus Manag. 2021 Jan;8(1):1870797.

   OpenUrl
9. 9.↵
   1. Madathil KC,
   2. Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, et al.

   Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Inform J. 2015 Sep;21(3):173-94.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Zhao Y,
    2. Zhang J.

    Consumer health information seeking in social media: A literature review. Health Inf Libr J. 2017 Dec;34(4):268-83.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.
    1. National Cancer Institute

    . HINTS Brief: US social media and health use and heath communication. National Institute of Health; 2011:2.
12. 12.↵
    1. Smailhodzic E,
    2. Hooijsma W,
    3. Boonstra A,
    4. Langley DJ.

    Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug;16(1):442.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Rosenberg S.

    Social activities, information seeking on subjects like health and education top the list of mobile activities [Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2019 [cited 2023 Feb 10, 2023]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/08/22/social-activities-information-seeking-on-subjects-like-health-and-education-top-the-list-of-mobile-activities/
14. 14.↵
    1. Fox S.

    The social life of health information [Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2014 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/01/15/the-social-life-of-health-information/
15. 15.↵
    1. Almaiman S,
    2. Bahkali S,
    3. Alabdulatif N, et al.

    Promoting oral health using social media platforms: seeking Arabic online oral health related information. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016; 226:283-86.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Almozainy M.

    Assessing the use of social media as a source of information related to dentistry in Saudi Arabia. J Dent Health Oral Disord. 2017 Dec;8(7).
17. 17.↵
    1. Suarez-Lledo V,
    2. Alvarez-Galvez J.

    Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan;23(1):e17187.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Nadeem R.

    Mixed views about social media companies using algorithms to find false information [Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/03/17/mixed-views-about-social-media-companies-using-algorithms-to-find-false-information/
19. 19.↵
    1. Federal Trade Commission

    . Is that post #sponsored? Consumer Information [Internet]. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission; 2017 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/2017/04/post-sponsored
20. 20.↵
    1. Gammoudi F,
    2. Sendi M,
    3. Omri MN.

    A survey on social media influence environment and influencers identification. Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022 Dec;12(1):145.

    OpenUrl
21. 21.↵
    1. Cobanoglu C,
    2. Cavusoglu M,
    3. Turktarhan G.

    A beginner’s guide and best practices for using crowdsourcing platforms for survey research: The case of Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). J Glob Bus Insights. 2021 Mar;6(1):92-97.

    OpenUrl
22. 22.
    1. Créquit P,
    2. Mansouri G,
    3. Benchoufi M, et al.

    Mapping of crowdsourcing in health: Systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018 May;20(5):e187.

    OpenUrlPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Wazny K.

    Applications of crowdsourcing in health: An overview. J Glob Health. 2018 Jun;8(1):010502.

    OpenUrl
24. 24.↵
    1. Chandler J,
    2. Shapiro D.

    Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016 Mar;12(1):53-81.

    OpenUrlPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Shi J,
    3. Kong H.

    Online health information seeking: a review and meta-analysis. Health Commun. 2021 Aug;36(10):1163-75.

    OpenUrl
26. 26.↵
    1. Leong CM,
    2. Loi AMW,
    3. Woon S.

    The influence of social media eWOM information on purchase intention. J Mark Anal. 2022 Jun;10(2):145-57.

    OpenUrl
27. 27.↵
    1. Erkan I,
    2. Evans C.

    Social media or shopping websites? The influence of eWOM on consumers’ online purchase intentions. J Mark Commun. 2018 Aug;24(6):617-32.

    OpenUrl