A Comparison of Generation Z and Millennial Dental Hygiene Students’ Preferred Learning Styles

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. MacKenzie WI Jr.,
   2. Scherer RF.

   Millennial research on fleek: Suggestions for improving generational research design. J Social Psychol. 2019 Mar; 159(2):119–24.

   OpenUrl
2. 2.↵
   1. Howe N,
   2. Strauss W.

   Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Books; 2000. 432p.
3. 3.↵
   1. Seemiller C,
   2. Grace M.

   Generation Z goes to college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2016. 320p.
4. 4.↵
   1. Strauss W,
   2. Howe N.

   Generations the history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York: Quill; 1992. 538p.
5. 5.↵
   1. Seemiller C,
   2. Grace M.

   Generation Z: A century in the making. London (England): Routledge; 2019. 348p.
6. 6.↵
   1. Rogers LS,
   2. Cohen MS.

   Medical education in pediatric and congenital heart disease: A focus on generational learning and technology in education. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2020 Dec; 59(2020):1-4.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Roberts DH,
   2. Newman LR,
   3. Schwartzstein RM.

   Twelve tips for facilitating millennials’ learning. Med Teach. 2012 Jan; 34(4):274–8.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Howe N,
   2. Strauss W.

   The next 20 years: How customer and workforce attitudes will evolve. Harv Bus Rev. 2007 Jul; 85(7-8):41–52.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Carter T.

   Preparing Generation Z for the teaching profession. SRATE. 2018 Winter; 27(1):1–8.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Loveland E.

    Instant generation. J College Adm. 2017 Winter; 235, 34–38.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    1. Hampton D,
    2. Welsh D,
    3. Wiggins AT.

    Learning preferences and engagement level of generation Z nursing students. Nurse Educ. 2020 Jun; 45(3):160–4.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Cilluffo A,
    2. Cohn D.

    6 demographic trends shaping the U.S. and the world in 2019 [Internet]. Washington DC: Pew Research Center. 2019 [cited 2023 Apr 4]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/11/6-demographic-trends-shaping-the-u-s-and-the-world-in-2019/
13. 13.↵
    1. Quinn MM,
    2. Smith T,
    3. Kalmar EL,
    4. Burgoon JM.

    What type of learner are your students? Preferred learning styles of undergraduate gross anatomy students according to the index of learning styles questionnaire. Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Nov; 11(4):358–65.

    OpenUrl
14. 14.↵
    1. Cassidy S.

    Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educ Psychol. 2004 Aug; 24(4):419–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. 15.↵
    1. Felder RM,
    2. Silverman LK.

    Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Eng Educ. 1988 Apr; 78(7):674-81.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Felder RM,
    2. Silverman LK.

    Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Eng Educ. 1988 Apr; 78(7):674-81.

    OpenUrl
17. 17.↵
    1. Shepherd J.

    Generational differences in learning style preferences among adult learners in the United States. J Behav Soc Sci. 2020 Jun; 7(2), 137-59.

    OpenUrl
18. 18.↵
    1. Alharbi HA,
    2. Almutairi AF,
    3. Alhelih EM,
    4. Alshehry AS.

    The learning preferences among nursing students in the King Saud University in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey. Nurs Res Pract. 2017 May; 2017:1–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Özdemir H,
    2. Zaybak A.

    Investigation of relationship between learning styles and psychomotor skills of nursing students. Int Anatol Acad J. 2020 Dec; 6(3), 234-45.

    OpenUrl
20. 20.↵
    1. Omar E.

    Perceptions of teaching methods for preclinical oral surgery: A comparison with learning styles. Open Dent J. 2017 Feb; 11(1):109–19.

    OpenUrl
21. 21.↵
    1. Dalmolin AC,
    2. Mackeivicz GA,
    3. Pochapski MT, et al.

    Learning styles preferences and e-learning experience of undergraduate dental students. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2018 Jun; 47(3):175–82.

    OpenUrl
22. 22.↵
    1. Williams CJ,
    2. Matt JJ,
    3. O’Reilly FL.

    Generational perspective of higher education online student learning styles. J Educ Learn. 2014 May; 3(2):33–51.

    OpenUrl
23. 23.↵
    1. Galingan RL.

    Modelling student satisfaction through I-E-M method for improved learning experience of selected generation Y and Z engineering students. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. 2019 Dec 15; Macao (China): 935-39.
24. 24.↵
    1. CODA

    . Survey of allied dental education 2020-21 [Internet]. Chicago (IL): American Dental Association; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 4]. Available from: https://www.ada.org/en/coda/find-a-program
25. 25.↵
    1. Blue CM.

    Do dental hygiene students fit the learning profile of the millennial student? J Dent Educ. 2009 Dec; 73(12):1372–8.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Felder RM,
    2. Spurlin J.

    Applications, reliability and validity of the Index of learning styles. Int J Eng Educ. 2005 Jan; 21(1):103-12.

    OpenUrl
27. 27.↵
    1. Litzinger TA,
    2. Lee SH,
    3. Wise JC,
    4. Felder RM.

    A study of the reliability and validity of the Felder-Soloman Index of learning styles. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition; Portland (OR): American Society for Engineering Education; 2005 Jun 12. 16 p.
28. 28.↵
    1. Zywno MS.

    A contribution to validation of score meaning for Felder-Soloman’s index of learning styles. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition; Washington (DC): American Society for Engineering Education; 2003 Jun 22. 5 p.
29. 29.↵
    1. Hosford CC,
    2. Siders WA.

    Felder-Soloman’s index of learning styles: Internal consistency, temporal stability, and factor structure. Teach Learn Med. 2010 Oct; 22(4):298–303.

    OpenUrlPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Martinez S,
    2. Falana F,
    3. Elie M.

    Learning styles of communication sciences and disorders students in a Historically Black College/University. eHearsay. 2018 Spring; 8(1), 17-28.

    OpenUrl