Relationships Between Course Capture Systems and Student Performance in Dental Hygiene Education

References

1. ↵
   1. McCann AL,
   2. Schneiderman ED,
   3. Hinton RJ

   . E-teaching and learning preferences of dental and dental hygiene students.
2. ↵
   1. Cheurprakobkit S

   . Web-based criminology/criminal justice programs in Texas colleges and universities. J Criminal Justice Educ. 2000 Aug;11(2):279-94.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Sitzmann TM,
   2. Kraiger K,
   3. Stewart DW,
   4. Wisher RA

   . The compartive effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: a meta-analysis. Pers Psyschol. 2006 Aug;59:623–664.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. McGraw-Hill Education

   . Tegrity case study: the university of Alabama achieving record growth while maintaining a strong student-teacher connection [Internet]. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Education; 2008 [cited 2016 Oct]. Available from: https://s3.amazonaws.com/ecommerce-prod.mheducation.com/unitas/highered/platforms/tegrity/case-studies/case-study-university-of-alabama.pdf.
5. ↵
   1. Gosper M,
   2. McNeil M,
   3. Woo K

   . Web-based lecture technologies and learning and teaching: a study of change in four Australian universities. J Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2010 Nov;15(4):84-95.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Horvath Z,
   2. O'Donnell JA,
   3. Johnson LA,
   4. et al

   . Use of lecture recordings in dental education: assessment of status quo and recommendations. J Dent Educ. 2013 Nov;77(11):1431-42.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   1. Brann DW,
   2. Sloop S

   . Curriculum development and technology incorporation in teaching neuroscience to graduate students in a medical school environment. Adv Physiol Educ. 2006 Mar;30(1):35-45.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Drouin MA

   . If you record it, some won't come: using lecture capture in introductory psychology. Teach Psychol. 2013 Dec;41(1):11-19.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Hew KF

   . Use of audio podcast in K-12 and higher education: a review of research topics and methodologies. Educ Tech Res Dev. 2009 Dec; 57:333-57.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Sadik A

    . Students' preferences for types of video lectures: lecture capture vs. screencasting recordings. Int J Higher Educ [Internet]. 2015 Sept 15 [cited 2016 Oct];4(4):94-104. Available from: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijhe

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Gorissen P,
    2. van Bruggen J,
    3. Jochems W

    . Students and recorded lectures: survey on current use and demands for higher education. Res Learn Technol. 2012 Jan;20:297-311.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Leadbeater W,
    2. Shuttleworth T,
    3. Couperthwaite J,
    4. Nightingale KP

    . Evaluating the use and impact of lecture recording in undergraduates: evidence for distinct approaches by different groups of students. Comput Educ. 2013 Feb; 61:185-92.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Scutter S,
    2. Stupans I,
    3. Sawyer T,
    4. King S

    . How do students use podcasts to support learning? Aust J Educ Technol. 2010;26(2):180-91.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Copley J

    . Audio and video podcasts of lectures for campus-based students: production and evaluation of student use. Innov Educ Teach Int 2007 Nov;44(4):387-99.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Smith K,
    2. Morris NP

    . Evaluation of biomedical science students use and perceptions of podcasting. Biosci Educ. 2014 Jul;22(1):3-15.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Cardall S,
    2. Krupat E,
    3. Ulrich M

    . Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet? Acad Med. 2008 Dec;83(12):1174-8.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 1. Pearce K,
    2. Scutter S

    . Podcasting of health sciences lectures: benefits for students from a non-English speaking background. Aust J Educ Technol. 2010;26(7):1028-41.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Wang R,
    2. Mattick K,
    3. Dunnec E

    . Medical students' perceptions of video-linked lectures and video-streaming. Res Learn Technol. 2010 Mar;18(1):19-27.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Sowan AK,
    2. Jenkins LS

    . Designing, delivering and evaluating a distance learning nursing course responsive to students needs. Int J Med Inform. 2013 Jun; 82:553-64.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. ↵
    1. Woo K,
    2. Gosper M,
    3. McNeill M,
    4. et al

    . Web-based lecture technologies: blurring the boundaries between face-to-face and distance learning. Res Learn Technol. 2008 Jun;16(2):81-93.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Griffin DK,
    2. Mitchell D,
    3. Thompson SJ

    . Podcasting by synchronizing PowerPoint and voice: what are the pedagogical benefits? Comput Educ. 2009 Sep; 53:532-9.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Williams A,
    2. Birch E,
    3. Hancock P

    . The impact of online lecture recordings on student performance. Aust J Educ Technol. 2012;28(2):199-213.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Selvig D,
    2. Holaday LW,
    3. Purkiss J,
    4. Hortsch M

    . Correlating students' educational background, study habits, and resource usage with learning success in medical histology. Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Jan-Feb; 8:1-11.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. ↵
    1. Gallagher JE,
    2. Dobrosielski-Vergona KA,
    3. Wingard RG,
    4. Williams TM

    . Web-based vs. traditional classroom instruction in gerontology: a pilot study. J Dent Hyg. 2005 Summer;79(3):1-10.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
25. ↵
    1. Garland KV

    . E-learning vs. classroom instruction in infection control in a dental hygiene program. J Dent Educ. 2010 Jun: 637-43.