Role of Manual Dexterity on Mechanical and Chemotherapeutic Oral Hygiene Regimens

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Peres MA,
   2. Macpherson LMD,
   3. Weyant RJ, et al.

   Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):249-260.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
2. 2.↵
   1. Jin LJ,
   2. Lamster IB,
   3. Greenspan JS, et al.

   Global burden of oral diseases: emerging concepts, management and interplay with systemic health. Oral Dis. 2016 Oct;22(7):609-19.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. 3.↵
   1. Valm AM.

   The structure of dental plaque microbial communities in the transition from health to dental caries and periodontal disease. J Mol Biol. 2019 Jul 26;431(16):2957-69.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. 4.↵
   1. Araujo MWB,
   2. Charles CA,
   3. Weinstein RB, et al.

   Meta-analysis of the effect of an essential oil-containing mouthrinse on gingivitis and plaque. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015 Aug;146(8):610-22.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. 5.
   1. Tilliss T,
   2. Carey CM.

   As an adjunct to mechanical oral hygiene, essential oil-containing mouthwash, compared to floss, cetylpryidinium chloride, or placebo may be more effective in reduction of plaque and gingitivitis. J Evid Base Dent Pract. 2017 Sept;17(3):256-8.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
6. 6.
   1. Haas AN,
   2. Wagner TP,
   3. Muniz FWMG, et al.

   Essential oils-containing mouthwashes for gingivitis and plaque: Meta-analyses and meta-regression. J Dent. 2016 Dec;55:7-15.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
7. 7.
   1. Van Leeuwen MP,
   2. Slot DE,
   3. Van der Weijden GA.

   The effect of an essential-oils mouthrinse as compared to a vehicle solution on plaque and gingival inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2014 Aug;12(3):160-7.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
8. 8.
   1. Charles CA,
   2. Lisante TA,
   3. Revankar R, et al.

   Early benefits with daily rinsing on gingival health improvements with an essential oil mouthrinse - post-hoc analysis of 5 clinical trials. J Dent Hyg. 2014;88 Suppl 1:40-50.

   OpenUrlFREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
9. 9.
   1. Boyle P,
   2. Koechlin A,
   3. Autier P.

   A systematic review with meta-analysis of mouthwash use for the prevention of dental plaque. Oral Dis. 2014 Jan;20:17-21.

   OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
10. 10.
    1. Neely AL.

    Essential oil mouthwash (EOMW) may be equivalent to chlorhexidine (CHX) for long-term control of gingival inflammation but CHX appears to perform better than EOMW in plaque control. J Evid Base Dent Pract. 2012 Sep;12(3):69-72.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
11. 11.
    1. Gunsolley JC.

    A meta-analysis of six-month studies of antiplaque and antigingivitis agents. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Dec;137(12):1649-57.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
12. 12.
    1. Stoeken JE,
    2. Paraskevas S,
    3. van der Weijden GA.

    The long-term effect of a mouthrinse containing essential oils on dental plaque and gingivitis: A systematic review. J Periodontol. 2007 Jul;78(7):1218-28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
13. 13.
    1. Bosma ML,
    2. McGuire JA,
    3. Sunkara A, et al.

    Efficacy of professional flossing, supervised flossing and mouthrinsing regimens on plaque and gingivitis: A 12-week, randomized clinical trial. J Dent Hygiene. 2022 Jun; 96(3);8-20.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
14. 14.↵
    1. Milleman J,
    2. Bosma ML,
    3. McGuire JA, et al.

    Comparative effectiveness of flossing and mouthrinse regimens on plaque and gingivitis: A 12-week virtually supervised clinical trial. J Dent Hygiene. 2022 Jun; 96(3);21-34.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
15. 15.↵
    1. Bauroth K,
    2. Charles CH,
    3. Mankodi SM, et al.

    The efficacy of an essential oil antiseptic mouthrinse vs. dental floss in controlling interproximal gingivitis: a comparative study. J Am Dent. 2003 Mar;134(3):359-65.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
16. 16.↵
    1. Rich S,
    2. Friedman JA,
    3. Schultz L.

    Effects of flossing on plaque and gingivitis in third grade schoolchildren. J Public Health Dent. 1989 Spring; 49(2):73-7.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
17. 17.↵
    1. Niederman R and
    2. Sullivan TM.

    Oral Hygiene Skill Achievement Index I. J Periodontol. 1981 Mar; 52(3):143-9.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
18. 18.↵
    1. Doherty SA,
    2. Ross A,
    3. Bennett CR.

    The oral hygiene performance test: development and validation of dental dexterity scale for the elderly. Spec Care Dentist. 1994 Jul-Aug; 14(4):144-52.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
19. 19.↵
    1. Barouch K,
    2. Al Asaad NA,
    3. Alhareky M.

    Clinical relevance of dexterity in oral hygiene. Br Dent J. 2019 Mar; 226(5):354-7.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
20. 20.↵
    1. Lafayette Instrument Co.

    Purdue Pegboard Test user instructions: Model 32020A [Internet]. Lafayette(IN): Lafayette Instrument Co; 2015 [cited 2022 Mar 1]. Available from: https://lafayetteevaluation.com/products/purdue-pegboard

    Google Scholar
21. 21.↵
    1. Asher, IE.

    Asher’s occupational therapy assessment tools, an annotated index. 4th ed. Bethesda (MD): AOTA Press; 2014. 836p.

    Google Scholar
22. 22.↵
    1. Gallus J and
    2. Mathiowetz V.

    Test-retest reliability of the Purdue Pegboard for persons with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occupat Ther. 2003 Jan-Feb;57(1):108-111.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
23. 23.
    1. Schuel K,
    2. Tumminello MB,
    3. Esposito P.

    Test-retest of the Purdue Pegboard in adults with intellectual disabilities. Am J Occupat Ther. 2016 Aug;70(4 Suppl 1): 7011500058p1.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
24. 24.↵
    1. Proud EL,
    2. Bilney B,
    3. Miller KJ, et al.

    Measuring hand dexterity in people with Parkinson’s disease: reliability of Pegboard Tests. Am J Occup Ther. 2019 Jul-Aug; 73(4): 7304205050p1–7304205050p8.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
25. 25.↵
    1. Jih A,
    2. Branch M,
    3. Fraswe M, et al.

    The convergent validity of the Jebsen Hand Function Test and Purdue Pegboard Test in adults with schizophrenia. Am J Occupat Ther. 2017 Jul;71(4 Suppl 1): 7111500050p1.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
26. 26.↵
    1. Shahar RB,
    2. Kisony R,
    3. Nota A.

    Validity of the Purdue Pegboard Test in assessing patients after traumatic hand injury. Work.1998;11(3):315-20.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
27. 27.↵
    1. Kenney EB,
    2. Saxe SR,
    3. Lenox JA, et al.

    The relationship of manual dexterity and knowledge to performance of oral hygiene. J Periodontal Res. 1976 Apr;11:67-73.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
28. 28.↵
    1. Reddon JR,
    2. Gill DM,
    3. Gauk SE,
    4. Maerz MD.

    Purdue Pegboard: test – retest estimates. Percept Mot Skills.1988 Apr; 66(2):503-6.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
29. 29.
    1. Sigirtmac IC,
    2. Cigdem O.

    Determination of the optimal cutoff values and validity of the Purdue Pegboard Test. Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Jan;85(1):62-7.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
30. 30.
    1. Backman C,
    2. Cork S,
    3. Gibson G,
    4. Parsons J.

    Assessment of hand function: the relationship between pegboard dexterity and applied dexterity. Can J Occup Ther. 1992 Oct; 59: 208-13.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. 31.
    1. Fleishman EA,
    2. Ellison GD.

    A factor analysis of fine manipulative tests. J Appl Psychol. 1962; 46: 96-105.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
32. 32.
    1. Fleishman EA,
    2. Hempel WE.

    A factor analysis of dexterity tests. Pers Psychol. 1954 Mar; 7:15-32.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
33. 33.
    1. Gonzalez V,
    2. Rowson J,
    3. Yoxall A.

    Development of the Variable Dexterity Test: construction, reliability and validity. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2015 Jan; 22(4):174-80.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
34. 34.↵
    1. Pergami P,
    2. Seemaladinne N,
    3. Billings A.

    Validation of a computer application as a test of motor function in healthy children and adults. Neuro Rehabilitation. 2012 Nov; 31(4):453-61.

    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
35. 35.↵
    1. American Dental Association

    . ADA Seal of Acceptance: independent research testing site qualification [Internet]. Chicago (IL): American Dental Association; 2022 [cited 2022 Mar 1] [about 6 screens]. Available from: https://www.ada.org/resources/research/science-and-research-institute/ada-seal-of-acceptance/ada-seal-resources/ada-seal-testing-sites

    Google Scholar
36. 36.↵
    1. Lobene RR,
    2. Weatherford T,
    3. Ross NM, et al.

    A modified gingival index for use in clinical trials. Clin Prev Dent.1986 Jan-Feb;8(1):3-6.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
37. 37.↵
    1. Saxton CA and
    2. van der Ouderaa FJG.

    The effect of a dentifrice containing zinc citrate and Triclosan on developing gingivitis. J Periodont Res.1989 Jan; 24:75-80.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
38. 38.
    1. Lobene RR,
    2. Soparkar PM,
    3. Newman MB.

    Use of dental floss. Effect on plaque and gingivitis. Clin Prev Dent.1982 Jan-Feb;4(1):5-8.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
39. 39.
    1. Newman MG,
    2. Takei H,
    3. Klokkevold PR,
    4. Carranza FA.

    Newman and Carranza’s clinical periodontology. 13th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier: 2019. 387p.

    Google Scholar
40. 40.
    1. Turesky S,
    2. Gilmore ND,
    3. Glickman I.

    Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of Vitamin C. J Periodontol. 1970 Jan;41(1):41-3.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
41. 41.↵
    1. Benson BJ,
    2. Henyon G,
    3. Grossman E, et al.

    Development and verification of the proximal/marginal plaque index. J Clin Dent. 1993;4(1):14-20.

    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
42. 42.↵
    1. McCambridge J,
    2. Witton J,
    3. Elbourne DR.

    Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67:267-77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar