Comparison of two Manual Toothbrushes in Effectiveness of Plaque Removal: A pilot study

References

1. ↵
   1. Loe H,
   2. Theilade E,
   3. Jensen SB

   . Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol. 1965 May; 36(3):177-187.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Loe H,
   2. Kleinman DV

   (eds). Dental plaque control measures and oral hygiene practices: Proceedings from a state-of-the-science workshop. Irl Pr. 1986;93-116.
3. ↵
   1. Barnes CM,
   2. Covey DA,
   3. Shi X,
   4. Yankell SL

   . Laboratory evaluations of a bi-level, extremely tapered bristled toothbrush and a conventional uniform bristled toothbrush. Am J Dent. 2009 Apr;22(2):84-8.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. 1. He T,
   2. Li S,
   3. Sun L

   . Clinical comparison of the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush with criss-cross bristle design. Am J Dent. 2009 Aug;22(4):200-202.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. ↵
   1. Warren P,
   2. Thompson M,
   3. Cugini M

   . Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design. J Clin Dent. 2006 Dec;18(2):49-54.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Stiller S,
   2. Bosma MLP,
   3. Shi X,
   4. Spirgel CM,
   5. Yankell SL

   . Interproximal access efficacy of three manual toothbrushes with extended, x-angled or flat multitufted bristles. Int J Dent Hygiene. 2010 Aug;8(3):244–248.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Rosema NAM,
   2. Timmerman MF,
   3. Verstag PA,
   4. van Palenstein Helderman WH,
   5. van der Velden U,
   6. van der Weijden GA

   . Safety and efficacy of two manual toothbrushes. Int J Dent Hygiene. 2010 Nov;8(4):280-285.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Checchi L,
   2. Montevecchi M,
   3. Gatto RM,
   4. Moreschi A,
   5. Checchi V

   . Clinical efficacy of two toothbrushes with different bristles. Int J Dent Hygiene. 2007 Nov;5(4):242–246.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Cifcibasi E,
   2. Koyuncuoglu CZ,
   3. Baser U,
   4. Bozacioglu B,
   5. Kasali K,
   6. Cintan S

   . Comparison of manual toothbrushes with different bristle designs in terms of cleaning efficacy and potential role on gingival recession. Eur J Dent. 2014 Jul;8(3):395-401.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Warren DP,
    2. Rice HC,
    3. Turner S

    . Comparison of plaque removing ability of one standard and two flexible-head toothbrushes. J Dent Hyg. 2004 Apr;78(2):340-342.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. ↵
    1. Mazza L,
    2. Gatto MR,
    3. Monaco G,
    4. Pelliccioni GA

    . A laboratory based investigation of a new elastic toothbrush head. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Nov 18;2014.
12. ↵
    1. Terézhalmy GT,
    2. Walters P,
    3. Bartizek RD,
    4. Grender JM,
    5. Briesbrock AR

    . Replicate single-use comparative study of plaque removal with two contemporary manual toothbrushes. Am J Dent. 2009 Jun;22(3):189-192.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. ↵
    1. Biesbrock AR,
    2. Bartizek RD,
    3. Walters PA

    . Improved plaque removal efficacy with a new manual toothbrush. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 May;1(9):1-8.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Harpenau L,
    2. Meyers G,
    3. Lyon C,
    4. Chambers D,
    5. Lundergan W

    . Blinded clinical evaluation of a new manual toothbrush. J Clin Dent. 2006;17(1):1-4.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. ↵
    1. Terézhalmy GT,
    2. Biesbrock AR,
    3. Walters PA,
    4. Grender JM,
    5. Bartizek RD

    . Clinical evaluation of brushing time and plaque removal potential of two manual toothbrushes. Int J Dent Hygiene. 2008 Nov;6(4):321-327.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Sharma NC,
    2. Qaqish JG,
    3. Galustians HJ,
    4. Cugini M,
    5. Thompson MC,
    6. Warren PR

    . Plaque removal efficacy and safety of the next generation of manual toothbrush with angled bristle technology: results from three comparative clinical studies. Am J Dent. 2005 Feb;18(1):3-7.

    OpenUrlPubMed
17. ↵
    1. Sharma NC,
    2. Qaqish J,
    3. Walters PA,
    4. Grender J,
    5. Biesbrock AR

    . A clinical evaluation of the plaque removal efficacy of five manual toothbrushes. J Clin Dent. 2010;21(1):8-12.

    OpenUrlPubMed
18. ↵
    1. American Dental Hygienists' Association

    . Chicago, IL. adha.org [Internet]. Available from: http://www.adha.org/sites/default/files/7221_Proper_Brushing_1.pdf
19. 1. American Dental Association

    , Chicago, IL. ada.org [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ada.org/en/Home-MouthHealthy/az-topics/b/brushing-your-teeth
20. ↵
    1. Wainwright J,
    2. Sheiham A

    . An analysis of methods of toothbrushing recommended by dental associations, toothpaste and toothbrush companies and in dental texts. Br Dent J. 2014 Aug;217(3):E5.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Wilkins E

    . Clinical Practice of the Dental Hygienist. 11th ed. Baltimore, MD. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2013. 1264 p.
22. ↵
    Getting a new product to market. Access. 2015 May-Jun;29(5):18-22.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Yankell SL,
    2. Shi X,
    3. Emling RC

    . Laboratory inter-proximal access efficacy and gingival margin cleaning of the elmex® sensitive soft, extra soft and ADA reference toothbrushes. J Clin Dent. 2007 Dec;18 (1):1-4.

    OpenUrlPubMed
24. ↵
    1. Van der Weijden GA,
    2. Hioe KPK

    . A systematic review of the effectiveness of self-performed mechanical plaque removal in adults with gingivitis using a manual toothbrush. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Oct;32(Suppl.6):214-228.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
25. ↵
    1. O'Leary TJ,
    2. Drake RB,
    3. Naylor JE

    . The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972 Jan;43(1):38-38.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 1. Battaglia A

    . The Bass technique using a specially designed toothbrush. Int J Dent Hygiene. 2008 Aug;6(3):183-187.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Jain Y

    . A comparison of powered and manual toothbrushes in controlling plaque and gingivitis: A clinical study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013 Jan;5:3-9.

    OpenUrl