Comparison of the Impact of Scaler Material Composition on Polished Titanium Implant Abutment Surfaces

References

1. ↵
   1. Esposito M,
   2. Murray–Curtis L,
   3. Grusovin MG,
   4. Coulthard P,
   5. Worthington HV

   . Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(4):CD003815.
2. ↵
   1. Albrektsson T,
   2. Zarb G,
   3. Worthington P,
   4. Eriksson AR

   . The long–term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1(1):11–25.

   OpenUrlPubMed
3. ↵
   1. Ozkan Y,
   2. Akoğlu B,
   3. Kulak–Ozkan Y

   . Five–year treatment outcomes with four types of implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible in partially edentulous patients: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(3):639–647.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. ↵
   1. Needleman I,
   2. Chin S,
   3. O'Brien T,
   4. Petrie A,
   5. Donos N

   . Systematic review of outcome measurements and reference group(s) to evaluate and compare implant success and failure. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(Suppl 12):122–132.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. ↵
   1. Cairo F,
   2. Sanz I,
   3. Matesanz P,
   4. Nieri M,
   5. Pagliaro U

   . Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in implant dentistry. A systematic review on critical aspects in design, outcome assessment and clinical relevance. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(Suppl 12):81–107.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. ↵
   1. Vere J,
   2. Joshi R

   . Quality assessment of prospective case series of dental implant surgery and prosthodontics published between 2004 and 2008: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(4):865–874.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. ↵
   1. Esposito M,
   2. Grusovin MG,
   3. Willings M,
   4. Coulthard P,
   5. Worthington HV

   . The effectiveness of immediate, early, and conventional loading of dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(6):893–904.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. ↵
   1. Berglundh T,
   2. Persson L,
   3. Klinge B

   . A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29(Suppl 3):197–212.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. ↵
   1. Lang NPK

   1. Albrektsson TIF

   . Consensus report of session IV. In: Lang NPK, eds. Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Periodontology. London: Quintessence. 1994. 365–369 p.
10. ↵
    1. Esposito M,
    2. Hirsch JM,
    3. Lekholm U,
    4. Thomsen P

    . Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106(3):721–764.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Teughels W,
    2. Van Assche N,
    3. Sliepen I,
    4. Quirynen M

    . Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(Suppl 2):68–81.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Berglundh T,
    2. Lindhe J,
    3. Ericsson I,
    4. Marinello CP,
    5. Liljenberg B,
    6. Thomsen P

    . The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991;2(2):81–90.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. ↵
    1. Berglundh T,
    2. Lindhe J,
    3. Sterrett JD

    . Clinical and structural characteristics of periodontal tissues in young and old dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 1991;18(8):616–623.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 1. Abrahamsson I,
    2. Berglundh T,
    3. Wennström J,
    4. Lindhe J

    . The peri–implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7(3):212–219.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. ↵
    1. Albrektsson T,
    2. Hansson HA

    . An ultrastructural characterization of the interface between bone and sputtered titanium or stainless steel surfaces. Biomaterials. 1986;7(3):201–205.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Gargiulo AW,
    2. Wentz FM,
    3. Orban B

    . Mitotic activity of human oral epithelium exposed to 30 per cent hydrogen peroxide. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1961;14:474–492.

    OpenUrlPubMed
17. ↵
    1. King GN,
    2. Hermann JS,
    3. Schoolfield JD,
    4. Buser D,
    5. Cochran DL

    . Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non–submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 2002;73(10):1111–1117.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. ↵
    1. Augthun M,
    2. Conrads G

    . Microbial findings of deep peri–implant bone defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12(1):106–112.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. ↵
    1. Lang NP,
    2. Bosshardt DD,
    3. Lulic M

    . Do mucositis lesions around implants differ from gingivitis lesions around teeth? J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(Suppl 11):182–187.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. ↵
    1. Berglundh T,
    2. Zitzmann NU,
    3. Donati M

    . Are peri–implantitis lesions different from periodontitis lesions? J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(Suppl 11):188–202.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. ↵
    1. Lang NP,
    2. Berglundh T,
    3. Working Group 4 of Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology

    . Periimplant diseases: where are we now?––Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(Suppl 11):178–181.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. ↵
    1. Mombelli A,
    2. Décaillet F

    . The characteristics of biofilms in peri–implant disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(Suppl 11):203–213.

    OpenUrlPubMed
23. ↵
    1. Garg A

    . The ailing and failing implant: prevention and treatment. Dent Implantol Update. 2003;14(5):33–37.

    OpenUrlPubMed
24. ↵
    1. Homiak AW,
    2. Cook PA,
    3. DeBoer J

    . Effect of hygiene instrumentation on titanium abutments: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67(3):364–369.

    OpenUrlPubMed
25. 1. Renvert S,
    2. Roos–Jansåker AM,
    3. Claffey N

    . Non–surgical treatment of peri–implant mucositis and peri–implantitis: a literature review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):305–315.

    OpenUrlPubMed
26. ↵
    1. Roos–Jansåker AM,
    2. Renvert S,
    3. Egelberg J

    . Treatment of peri–implant infections: a literature review. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(6):467–485.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Mombelli A

    . Microbiology and antimicrobial therapy of peri–implantitis. Periodontol 2000. 2002;28:177–189.

    OpenUrlPubMed
28. ↵
    1. George K,
    2. Zafiropoulos GG,
    3. Murat Y,
    4. Hubertus S,
    5. Nisengard RJ

    . Clinical and microbiological status of osseointegrated implants. J Periodontol. 1994;65(8):766–770.

    OpenUrlPubMed
29. ↵
    1. Thomson–Neal D,
    2. Evans GH,
    3. Meffert RM

    . Effects of various prophylactic treatments on titanium, sapphire, and hydroxyapatite–coated implants: an SEM study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1989;9(4):300–311.

    OpenUrlPubMed
30. ↵
    1. Stefani LA

    . The care and maintenance of the dental implant patient. J Dent Hyg. 1988;62(9):447, 464–466.

    OpenUrlPubMed
31. ↵
    1. Quirynen M,
    2. van Steenberghe D

    . Bacterial colonization of the internal part of two–stage implants. An in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1993;4(3):158–161.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Quirynen M,
    2. Bollen CM

    . The influence of surface roughness and surface–free energy on supra– and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22(1):1–14.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Bain C,
    2. Green S,
    3. Bain GB,
    4. Price D

    . Effect of various cleaning devices on dental implants. J Dent Res. 1993;72(Spec. Issue):287.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Bain CA

    . An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of various implant–cleaning instruments. Quintessence Int. 1998;29(7):423–427.

    OpenUrlPubMed
35. ↵
    1. Matarasso S,
    2. Quaremba G,
    3. Coraggio F,
    4. Vaia E,
    5. Cafiero C,
    6. Lang NP

    . Maintenance of implants: an in vitro study of titanium implant surface modifications subsequent to the application of different prophylaxis procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7(1):64–72.

    OpenUrlPubMed
36. ↵
    1. Ewing S

    . Guidance evolving on cleaning dental implants. Hygiene Tribune. 2012;5(1).
37. ↵
    1. Fox SC,
    2. Moriarty JD,
    3. Kusy RP

    . The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study. J Periodontol. 1990;61(8):485–490.

    OpenUrlPubMed
38. ↵
    1. Duarte PM,
    2. Reis AF,
    3. de Freitas PM,
    4. Ota–Tsuzuki C

    . Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments. J Periodontol. 2009;80(11):1824–1832.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Fontana CR,
    2. Abernethy AD,
    3. Som S,
    4. et al

    . The antibacterial effect of photodynamic therapy in dental plaque–derived biofilms. J Periodontal Res. 2009;44(6):751–759.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
40. ↵
    1. Rühling A,
    2. Kocher T,
    3. Kreusch J,
    4. Plagmann HC

    . Treatment of subgingival implant surfaces with Teflon–coated sonic and ultrasonic scaler tips and various implant curettes. An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5(1):19–29.

    OpenUrlPubMed
41. 1. Sato S,
    2. Kishida M,
    3. Ito K

    . The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: an in vitro study. J Periodontol. 2004;75(9):1269–1273.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
42. ↵
    1. Augthun M,
    2. Tinschert J,
    3. Huber A

    . In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces. J Periodontol. 1998;69(8):857–864.

    OpenUrlPubMed
43. ↵
    1. Mann M,
    2. Parmar D,
    3. Walmsley AD,
    4. Lea SC

    . Effect of plastic–covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(1):76–82.

    OpenUrlPubMed
44. ↵
    1. Baek SH,
    2. Shon WJ,
    3. Bae KS,
    4. Kum KY,
    5. Lee WC,
    6. Park YS

    . Evaluation of the safety and efficiency of novel metallic ultrasonic scaler tip on titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(11):1269–1274.

    OpenUrlPubMed
45. 1. Hallmon WW,
    2. Waldrop TC,
    3. Meffert RM,
    4. Wade BW

    . A comparative study of the effects of metallic, nonmetallic, and sonic instrumentation on titanium abutment surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11(1):96–100.

    OpenUrlPubMed
46. ↵
    1. Speelman JA,
    2. Collaert B,
    3. Klinge B

    . Evaluation of different methods to clean titanium abutments. A scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3(3):120–127.

    OpenUrlPubMed
47. ↵
    1. Rapley JW,
    2. Swan RH,
    3. Hallmon WW,
    4. Mills MP

    . The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5(1):47–52.

    OpenUrlPubMed
48. ↵
    1. Ramaglia L,
    2. di Lauro AE,
    3. Morgese F,
    4. Squillace A

    . Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations. Implant Dent. 2006;15(1):77–82.

    OpenUrlPubMed
49. ↵
    1. Bailey GM,
    2. Gardner JS,
    3. Day MH,
    4. Kovanda BJ

    . Implant surface alterations from a nonmetallic ultrasonic tip. J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr. 1998;46(3):69–73.

    OpenUrlPubMed
50. ↵
    1. Mengel R,
    2. Buns CE,
    3. Mengel C,
    4. Flores–de–Jacoby L

    . An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13(1):91–96.

    OpenUrlPubMed
51. ↵
    1. Mengel R,
    2. Meer C,
    3. Flores–de–Jacoby L

    . The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride–coated abutments with different instruments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(2):232–238.

    OpenUrlPubMed