Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1:
Implant Analog–Abutment Mount Placed In Stone Model and a Representative SEM Image of an Abutment Illustrating the Areas of Interest Evaluated
- Figure 2A:
Comparison of Number of Scratches Based on a Scratch Index on Each Abutment Surface Following Scaling With All 6 Scalers Using SEM At x1,000 Magnification
- Figure 2B:
Comparison of Number of Scratches Based on a Scratch Index on Each Abutment Surface Following Scaling With All 6 Scalers Using SEM At x1,000 Magnification
- Figure 2C:
Comparison of Number of Scratches Based on a Scratch Index on Each Abutment Surface Following Scaling With All 6 Scalers Using SEM At x1,000 Magnification
- Figure 3:
Evaluation of Scratch Width on Abutment Surfaces Following Scaling With All 6 Scalers Using SEM at x10,000 Magnification
- Figure 4:
Comparison of Length of Scratches Observed Following Scaling with All 6 Scalers Using SEM at x1,000 Magnification
- Figure 5:
Comparison of Width of Scratches Based on a Depth Index on Each Abutment Surface Following Scaling with All 6 Scalers Using SEM at x10,000 Magnification
- Figure 6:
The Efficacy of the Scalers in Biofilm Removal from Abutment Surfaces
Tables
- Table II:
Overall Comparison of Composite Index for Scratch Number, Width, Length and Depth
