Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisements
    • Subscribing
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • JDH Reviewers
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Dental Hygiene
Visit the American Dental Hygienists' Association's main website
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Journal of Dental Hygiene

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisements
    • Subscribing
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • JDH Reviewers
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Visit jdenthyg on Facebook
  • Follow jdenthyg on Twitter
  • Follow jdenthyg on Instagram
  • Follow jdenthyg on Linkedin
  • RSS feeds
Research Article2006 Annual Session Poster Abstracts

Accurate Calculus Detection: Is it Possible?

Carolyn H Ray
American Dental Hygienists' Association January 2007, 81 (1) 23;
Carolyn H Ray
Texas Woman's University, Department of Dental Hygiene.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

An important goal of dental hygiene education is graduating clinically competent practitioners. Much of the clinical curriculum includes process and product evaluations that monitor and assess dental hygiene students' clinical abilities, especially related to the detection and removal of subgingival calculus. The purpose of this study was to determine if dental hygiene faculty were consistent in detecting “clickable” subgingival calculus that remained after the administration of a mock clinical board (MCB). A MCB was administered to 24 dental hygiene students during their last semester before graduation. The patient criteria for the MCB matched that of the regional board, including: a quadrant with at least 6 natural teeth, including one permanent molar with a proximal contact; a minimum of 12 surfaces with heavy, subgingival calculus; a maximum of 6 deposits on anterior teeth; and no gross decay, probing depths greater than 6 mm, or other dental conditions that would interfere with calculus detection or removal. Five dental hygiene faculty members were assigned with 3 faculty in the morning MCB and three in the afternoon. The faculty members were required to attend an orientation to calibrate the procedures used during the MCB. One faculty member was assigned as a “chief examiner” for each of the 3 sections of the clinic, with 4 dental hygiene students taking the MCB. The “chief examiner” recorded the 12 areas that were evaluated for calculus upon completion of the MCB. Students were not privy to the areas being examined. Upon completion of the procedures, each patient was examined by 3 examiners. The faculty members did not have access to the other instructors' evaluations. The 12 specified areas were examined with an 11/12 ODU explorer, and any surface that exhibited “clickable” calculus was recorded. The results were tallied to track the surfaces marked by each examiner. Two hundred eighty-eight surfaces were examined. There was total agreement of the 3 examiners on 69.8% (n=201) of areas where no calculus remained and 4.6% (n=4) where calculus remained. There were 30.2% (n=87) surfaces that were marked by 1, 2, or 3 for having “clickable” calculus. Two examiners agreed on 33.3% (n=29) surfaces with remaining calculus, while 62.2% (n=54) surfaces were marked by only one examiner. In conclusion, there seems to be more agreement on areas with no detectable deposits. Total agreement was less likely on surfaces that were evaluated as having calculus remaining. More research needs to be done to determine accurate calibration methods for clinical dental hygiene faculty. The findings presented here suggest that subgingival calculus detection may be more subjective than dental hygiene educators realize and calibration is essential.

  • Copyright © 2007 The American Dental Hygienists' Association
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Dental Hygienists Association: 81 (1)
American Dental Hygienists' Association
Vol. 81, Issue 1
Winter 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Dental Hygiene.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Accurate Calculus Detection: Is it Possible?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Dental Hygiene
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Dental Hygiene web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Accurate Calculus Detection: Is it Possible?
Carolyn H Ray
American Dental Hygienists' Association Jan 2007, 81 (1) 23;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Accurate Calculus Detection: Is it Possible?
Carolyn H Ray
American Dental Hygienists' Association Jan 2007, 81 (1) 23;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Similar Articles

More in this TOC Section

  • Development and Implementation of a Web-based BSDH Degree Completion Program
  • A Program to Help Identify Victims of Domestic Violence
  • Changing Attitudes About Elementary School Dental Health Education: A Pilot Study
Show more 2006 Annual Session Poster Abstracts

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

About

  • About ADHA
  • About JDH
  • JDH Reviewers
  • Contact Us

Helpful Links

  • Submit a Paper
  • Author Guidelines
  • FAQs

More Information

  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • Help

ISSN #: 1553-0205

Copyright © 2023 American Dental Hygienists’ Association

Powered by HighWire