Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archived Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisements
    • Subscribing
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • JDH Reviewers
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Permissions

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Dental Hygiene

Visit the American Dental Hygienists' Association's main website

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Journal of Dental Hygiene

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archived Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisements
    • Subscribing
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • JDH Reviewers
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Permissions
  • Visit jdenthyg on Facebook
  • Follow jdenthyg on Twitter
  • Follow jdenthyg on Instagram
  • Follow jdenthyg on Linkedin
  • RSS feeds
Research ArticleResearch

Electromyographical Assessments of Recommended Neck and Trunk Positions for Dental Hygienists

Margaret F. Lemaster, Kyle J. Kelleran, Maryam Moeini and Daniel M. Russell
American Dental Hygienists' Association October 2021, 95 (5) 6-13;
Margaret F. Lemaster
Adjunct professor, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
MS, RDH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Kyle J. Kelleran
Research scientist, Department of Emergency Medicine, University at Buffalo in Buffalo, NY, USA.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maryam Moeini
Graduate assistant, School of Rehabilitation Sciences;
BEng, MEng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel M. Russell
Associate professor, School of Rehabilitation Sciences; both at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
BSc (Hons), MS, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Torques on the vertebrae of the neck and lower back due to neck flexion and trunk flexion.

    Circles indicate the approximate center of mass of the head and trunk. Arrows represent the force of gravity vectors (weight) of the head (WH) and trunk (WT).

    A: Approximately neutral alignment with the force vectors acting through the spine.

    B: Demonstrates neck flexion (θH). The weight of the head produces a torque proportional to the perpendicular distance from the axis of rotation (RH).

    C: Demonstrates trunk flexion(θT). The weight of the trunk produces a torque proportional to the perpendicular distance from the axis of rotation (RT).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Group mean activity of the cervical erector spinae (CES) muscle as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction is plotted for five different neck flexion angles

    Error bars indicate one standard deviation. The 0° neck flexion condition was significantly different from all other neck flexion conditions

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Group mean activity of the upper trapezius (UT) muscle as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction is plotted for five different neck flexion angles.

    Error bars indicate one standard deviation. The 0° neck flexion condition was significantly different from the 30° and 40° neck flexion conditions.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Group mean activity of the thoracic erector spinae (TES) muscle as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction is plotted for five different trunk flexion angles.

    Error bars indicate one standard deviation. The 0° trunk flexion condition was significantly different from the 20°, 30°, and 40° trunk flexion conditions.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Group mean activity of the iliocostalis lumborum (IL) muscle as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction is plotted for five different trunk flexion angles.

    Error bars indicate one standard deviation. The 0° neck flexion condition was significantly different from the 30° and 40° neck flexion conditions.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table I.

    Anthropometric neck torque (TH) computed for five different neck flexion angles (θ).*

    Table I.
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table II.

    Anthropometric lower back torque (TH&T) computed for five trunk flexion angles (θ)*

    Table II.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Dental Hygienists' Association: 95 (5)
American Dental Hygienists' Association
Vol. 95, Issue 5
October 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Dental Hygiene.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Electromyographical Assessments of Recommended Neck and Trunk Positions for Dental Hygienists
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Dental Hygiene
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Dental Hygiene web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Electromyographical Assessments of Recommended Neck and Trunk Positions for Dental Hygienists
Margaret F. Lemaster, Kyle J. Kelleran, Maryam Moeini, Daniel M. Russell
American Dental Hygienists' Association Oct 2021, 95 (5) 6-13;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Electromyographical Assessments of Recommended Neck and Trunk Positions for Dental Hygienists
Margaret F. Lemaster, Kyle J. Kelleran, Maryam Moeini, Daniel M. Russell
American Dental Hygienists' Association Oct 2021, 95 (5) 6-13;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Similar Articles

More in this TOC Section

  • Implementation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases by Clinical Dental Hygienists
  • Dental Hygiene Students’ Education and Intent to Use Recommended Communication Techniques
  • Dental Hygiene Student and Faculty Perspectives on Disposable vs. Traditional Local Anesthetic Syringes: A pilot study
Show more Research

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • ergonomics
  • posture
  • musculoskeletal disorders
  • dental hygienists
  • oral health care providers
  • occupational health

About

  • About ADHA
  • About JDH
  • JDH Reviewers
  • Contact Us

Helpful Links

  • Submit a Paper
  • Author Guidelines
  • Permissions
  • FAQs

More Information

  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • Help

ISSN #: 1553-0205

Copyright © 2025 American Dental Hygienists’ Association

Powered by HighWire