Comparison of the Efficacy of Calculus Detection Between Ultrasonic Inserts and an Explorer

References

1. ↵
   1. Cobb CM

   . Clinical significance of non-surgical periodontal therapy: an evidence-based perspective of scaling and root planing. J Clin Periodontol. 2002 May;29 Suppl 2:6-16.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Corbet EF,
   2. Vaughan AJ,
   3. Kieser JB

   . The periodontally-involved root surface. J Clin Periodontol. 1993 Jul; 20(6):402-10.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 1. Darby M,
   2. Walsh M

   . Dental hygiene theory and practice, 4th edition. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders Company; 2015. p. 55-73.
4. ↵
   1. Henry RK,
   2. Goldie MP

   . Dental hygiene application to clinical practice. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company; 2016. p. 394-407.
5. ↵
   1. Pippin DJ,
   2. Feil P

   . Interrater agreement on subgingival calculus detection following scaling. J Dent Educ. 1992 May;56(5):322-26.

   OpenUrlAbstract
6. ↵
   1. Sherman PR,
   2. Hutchens LH Jr..,
   3. Jewson LG,
   4. et al

   . The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planning. I. Clinical detection of residual calculus. J Periodontol. 1990 Jan;61(1):3-8.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. ↵
   1. Kwan JY

   . Enhanced periodontal debridement with the use of micro ultrasonic, periodontal endoscopy. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2005 Mar;33(3):241-48.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. ↵
   1. Stambaugh RV,
   2. Myers G,
   3. Ebling W,
   4. et al

   . Endoscopic visualization of the submarginal gingiva dental sulcus and tooth root surfaces. J Periodontol. 2002 Apr;73(4):374-82.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. ↵
   1. Kocker T,
   2. Strackeljan J,
   3. Behr D

   . Feasability of computer asssited recognition of different dental heard tissues. J Dent Res. 2000 Mar; 79 (3): 829-38.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. ↵
    1. Osborn JB,
    2. Lenton PA,
    3. Lunos SA,
    4. et al

    . Endoscopic vs. tactile evaluation of subgingival calculus. J Dent Hyg. 2014 Aug;88(4):229-36.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
11. ↵
    1. Geisinger ML,
    2. Mealey BL,
    3. Schoolfield J,
    4. et al

    . The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing: an evaluation of therapy with and without the use of the periodontal endoscope. J Periodontol. 2007 Jan;78(1):22-8.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. ↵
    1. Singh S,
    2. Uppoor A,
    3. Nayak D

    . A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of manual, magnetostrictive and piezoelectric ultrasonic instruments--an in vitro profilometric and SEM study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Feb;20(1):21-6.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. ↵
    1. Archana V

    . Calculus detection technologies: where do we stand now? J Med Life. 2014;7 Spec No. 2:18-23.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Tunkel J,
    2. Heinecke A,
    3. Flemmig TF

    . A systematic review of efficacy of machine-driven and manual subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29 Suppl 3:72-81; discussion 90-1.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Meissner G,
    2. Oehme B,
    3. Strackeljan J,
    4. et al

    . Clinical subgingival calculus detection with a smart ultrasonic device: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Feb;35(2):126-32.

    OpenUrlPubMed
16. ↵
    1. Hodges KO

    . Components of optimal ultrasonic therapy. Todays FDA. 2014 May-Jun;26(3):58-61, 3.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Silva LB,
    2. Hodges KO,
    3. Calley KH,
    4. et al

    . A comparison of dental ultrasonic technologies on subgingival calculus removal: a pilot study. J Dent Hyg. 2012 Spring;86(2):150-8.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
18. ↵
    1. Hinchman SS,
    2. Funk A,
    3. DeBiase C,
    4. et al

    . Ultrasonic instrumentation instruction in dental hygiene programs in the United States. J Dent Hyg. 2016 Apr;90(2):135-42.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
19. ↵
    1. Rams TE,
    2. Oler J,
    3. Listgarten MA,
    4. et al

    . Utility of Ramfjord index teeth to assess periodontal disease progression in longitudinal studies. J Clin Periodontol. 1993 Feb;20(2):147-50.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. ↵
    1. Koo TK,
    2. Li MY

    . A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. ↵
    1. Shrout PE,
    2. Fleiss JL

    . Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Guggenmoos-Holzmann I

    . The meaning of kappa: probabilistic concepts of reliability and validity revisited. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Jul;49(7):775-82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 1. McHugh ML

    . Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Media. 2012 Oct;22(3):276-82.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Sim J,
    2. Wright CC

    . The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005 Mar;85(3):257-68.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. ↵
    1. Parikh R,
    2. Mathai A,
    3. Parikh S,
    4. et al

    . Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan-Feb;56(1):45-50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
26. ↵
    1. Santiago LJ,
    2. Freudenthal JJ,
    3. Peterson T,
    4. et al

    . Dental hygiene faculty calibration using two accepted standards for calculus detection: a pilot study. J Dent Educ. 2016 Aug;80(8):975-82.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text