Perceptions of California Dental Hygienists Regarding Mandatory Continued Competence Requirements as a Condition of License Renewal

References

1. ↵
   1. American Dental Hygienists' Association

   : Dental hygiene focusing on advancing the profession; Access 2005;19(5).
2. ↵
   1. American Dental Education Association

   : Competencies for entry into the profession of dental hygiene (As approved by the 2003 House of Delegates) J Dent Educ. 2004; 68(7) 745-749.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
3. ↵
   1. American Dental Hygienists' Association

   : Competencies for the Advanced Dental Hygiene Practitioner (ADHP); adopted 2008 Mar 10; ADHA Board of Trustees.
4. ↵
   1. Finocchio LJ,
   2. Dower CM,
   3. Blick NT,
   4. Gragnola CM,
   5. the Taskforce on Health Care Workforce Regulation

   . Strengthening consumer protection: priorities for health care workforce regulation. San Francisco (CA): Pew Health Professions Commission; Oct 1998. p. 38.
5. ↵
   1. Ferguson A

   . Evaluating the purpose and benefits of continuing education in nursing and the implications for the provision of continuing educa-tion for cancer nurses. J Adv Nurs. 1994; 19(4): 640-646.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. ↵
   1. American Dental Hygienists' Association

   : Dental hygiene focusing on advancing the profession; Access, 2005; 19(5).
7. ↵
   1. Case Di Leonardi B,
   2. Biel M

   . Moving forward with a clear definition of continuing competence. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2012; 43(8):346-351.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. ↵
   1. Dental Hygiene Committee of California

   (Joint Oversight Hearing, Mar 17, 2014, Senate Committee on Business and Professions and Consumer Protection); Identified Issues, Background, and Recommendations Regarding the Dental Hygiene Committee of California.
9. ↵
   1. Joinson A

   . Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires. Behav Res Methods Instr Comput. 1999; 31(3):433-438

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Richman WL,
    2. Kiesler S,
    3. Weisband S,
    4. Drasgow F

    . A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. J Appl Psychol. 1999; 84(5):754-775

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Fox S,
    2. Schwartz D

    . Social desirability and controllability in computerized and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires. Comput Hum Behav. 2002; 18(4): 389-410.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Boyer KK,
    2. Olson JR,
    3. Calantone RJ,
    4. Jackson EC

    . Print versus electronic surveys: a comparison of two data collection methodologies. J Oper Manag. 2002; 20(4): 357-373.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Schmidt WC

    . World-Wide Web survey research: benefits, potential problems, and solutions. Behav Res Methods Instr Comput. 1997; 29(2): 274-279.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    Qualtrics, Year of development: 2005 year, Version 2013. Provo, Utah, USA.
15. ↵
    1. American Dental Hygienists' Association

    . Report of Reference Committee C, 2014 ADHA House of Delegates.
16. ↵
    1. American Dental Hygienists' Association

    2015 House of Delegates Manual; Proposed Resolution #17.
17. ↵
    California Dental Association – Code of Ethics. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cda.org/about-cda/cda-codeof-ethics. Accessed 2015 May 11.
18. ↵
    Minnesota Board of Dentistry Updates, Winter 2000;15(3). [Internet]. Available from: http://www.dentalboard.state.mn.us/Portals/3/Winter2000.PDF. Accessed 2015 May 11.
19. ↵
    1. Choudhry NK,
    2. Fletcher RH,
    3. Souimerai SB

    . Systematic review: The relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med, 2005, 142 (4), 260-273.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Low DS,
    2. Kalkarf KL

    . Assessing continued competency: an approach for dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996; 127(3): 383-388.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. ↵
    1. Graves WS III.

    . Continued competency – The American Association of Dental Boards' perspective. J Am Coll Dent. 2012;79(3): 20-23.

    OpenUrlPubMed
22. ↵
    1. Dodge WW,
    2. Winder RL,
    3. Young SK,
    4. et al

    . Continued competency assessment – Its history and role in health professions. J Am Coll Dent. 2012;79(3): 5-12.

    OpenUrlPubMed
23. ↵
    California Board of Podiatric Medicine – Information on Continued Competence. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bpm.ca.gov/forms_pubs/fsconted.shtml. Accessed 2015 Oct 29.
24. ↵
    College of Registered Dental Hygienists of Alberta – Continuing Competence Program Rules. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.crdha.ca/media/17075/crdha_rh07_ccpr_dec_01_2009.pdf. Accessed 2015 Oct 29.
25. ↵
    1. American Dental Association

    . Dentistry – The model profession. 1999. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ada.org/en/about-the-ada/ada-positions-policies-and-statements/dentistry-amodel-profession. Accessed 2015 May 11.
26. ↵
    American Dental Association – Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct. 2012. http://www.ada.org/~/media/ADA/About%20the%20ADA/Files/code_of_ethics_2012.ashx. Accessed 2015 May 11.
27. ↵
    1. Cole JR II.,
    2. Findley JS,
    3. Martin MM,
    4. et al

    . Continued competency assessment – Does it have a necessary role in dentistry? J Am Coll Dent. 2012;79(3): 13-19.

    OpenUrlPubMed
28. ↵
    American Dental Hygienists' Association – Policy Manual. #17-15, p. 37, 2015 June 22. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.adha.org/resources-docs/7614_Policy_Manual.pdf. Accessed 2015 Oct 29.