A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices

References

1. ↵
   1. Mauriello SM,
   2. Overman VP,
   3. Platin E

   . Radiographic imaging for the dental team. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co. 1995. p. 3.
2. ↵
   1. Pitts NB

   . Film-holding, beam-aiming and collimating devices as an aid to standardization in intra-oral radiography: a review. J Dentistry. 1984;12:36-46.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Benkow HH

   . A new principle and appliance for radiographic tooth measurements. J Dent Res. 1957; 36:641-643.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
4. 1. Wege WR

   . A technique for sequentially reproducing intra-oral film. Oral Surg. 1967;23:454-458.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. 1. Colyer S

   . Some technical points in dental radiography. Br J Radiol. 1936;9:615-619.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 1. Kells CE

   . Roentgen rays. Dental Cosmos. 1899;41:1014-1029.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. McCormack FW

   . A plea for standardized oral radiography. J Dent Res. 1920;11:467-501.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Updegrave WJ

   . The paralleling extension-cone technique in intraoral dental radiography. Oral Surg. 1951;4:1250-1261.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. ↵
   1. Medwedeff FM,
   2. Knox WH,
   3. Latimer P

   . A new device to reduce patient irradiation and improve dental film quality. Oral Surg. 1962;15:1079-1088.

   OpenUrlPubMed
10. ↵
    1. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs

    . The use of dental radiographs. Update and recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(9):1304-1312.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    2014 Product Catalogue. Dentsply Rinn [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2014 August 11]. Available from: http://www.rinncorp.com. Elgin, Il.USA or http://www.rinncorp.com/Pdf/MK287_FlipRay-PA_2.pdf
12. ↵
    1. Tang Q,
    2. Mauriello SM,
    3. Platin E,
    4. Ludlow JB

    . Three intraoral radiographic receptor-positioning systems: a comparative study. J Dent Res. 2012;91(Special Issue A):Abstract number 1397.
13. ↵
    1. Parrott LA,
    2. Ng SY

    . A comparison between bite-wing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: a retrospective study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(2):102-109.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text