Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisements
    • Subscribing
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • JDH Reviewers
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Dental Hygiene
Visit the American Dental Hygienists' Association's main website
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Journal of Dental Hygiene

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisements
    • Subscribing
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • JDH Reviewers
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Visit jdenthyg on Facebook
  • Follow jdenthyg on Twitter
  • Follow jdenthyg on Instagram
  • Follow jdenthyg on Linkedin
  • RSS feeds
Research ArticleResearch

Microbial Contamination of Power Toothbrushes: A Comparison of Solid-Head Versus Hollow-Head Designs

Donna W. Morris, Millicent Goldschmidt, Harris Keene and Stanley G. Cron
American Dental Hygienists' Association August 2014, 88 (4) 237-242;
Donna W. Morris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Millicent Goldschmidt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harris Keene
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stanley G. Cron
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose: Microbial contamination of manual toothbrushes relative to their design has been documented for decades, citing concern for cross contamination and self-infection with microorganisms. A pilot study of different power toothbrushes was conducted, to compare a solid-head brush to 2 hollow-head brushes for residual contamination with commonly occurring oral microorganisms.

Methods: Participants who met inclusion criteria were enrolled and brushed twice daily for 3 weeks with 1 of 3 randomly assigned power toothbrushes. Brush heads were vortexed and cultured using 5 appropriate media for oral microorganisms: anaerobes and facultative microorganisms, yeast and mold, oral streptococci and oral enterococci anaerobes, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Fusobacterium species. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the brush groups for transformed microbial counts after adjusting for any demographic variables that may have confounded the results.

Results: The solid-head power toothbrush was found to have significantly less microbial contamination than either of the 2 hollow-head power toothbrushes for all the bacteria tested and less than 1 of the hollow-head brushes for yeast and mold.

Conclusion: The solid-head power toothbrush studied had significantly less residual microbial contamination than the 2 hollow-head power toothbrushes after 3 weeks of twice daily brushing with non-antimicrobial toothpaste.

  • porphyromonas gingivalis
  • fusobacterium species
  • candida species
  • streptococci
  • anaerobes
  • toothbrush

Footnotes

  • Donna W. Morris, RDH, MEd, is a Professor in the Department of Periodontology and Dental Hygiene at the University of Texas Health Science Center School of Dentistry at Houston, Texas. Millicent Goldschmidt, MS, PhD, is a Professor Emerita in the Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences at the University of Texas Health Science Center School of Dentistry at Houston, Texas. Harris Keene, DDS, is a retired Professor from the Department of Head and Neck Surgery at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at the University Of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Texas. Stanley G. Cron, MSPH, is a Research Instructor, Center for Nursing Research, School of Nursing, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

  • This study supports the NDHRA priority area, Clinical Dental Hygiene Care: Assess the use of evidence-based treatment recommendations in dental hygiene practice.

  • Disclosure

    This study was funded in part by a grant from Advance Response Corp., NY, NY who provided both products and funding for laboratory supplies. The authors acknowledge that there are no conflicts of interest to report associated with this study.

  • Copyright © 2014 The American Dental Hygienists’ Association
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Dental Hygienists Association: 88 (4)
American Dental Hygienists' Association
Vol. 88, Issue 4
August 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Dental Hygiene.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Microbial Contamination of Power Toothbrushes: A Comparison of Solid-Head Versus Hollow-Head Designs
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Dental Hygiene
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Dental Hygiene web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Microbial Contamination of Power Toothbrushes: A Comparison of Solid-Head Versus Hollow-Head Designs
Donna W. Morris, Millicent Goldschmidt, Harris Keene, Stanley G. Cron
American Dental Hygienists' Association Aug 2014, 88 (4) 237-242;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Microbial Contamination of Power Toothbrushes: A Comparison of Solid-Head Versus Hollow-Head Designs
Donna W. Morris, Millicent Goldschmidt, Harris Keene, Stanley G. Cron
American Dental Hygienists' Association Aug 2014, 88 (4) 237-242;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods and Materials
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Similar Articles

More in this TOC Section

  • Detergent Pod-Related Oral-aerodigestive/ocular Injuries in Children, Ages >0 to <18 years
  • Domestic Violence Knowledge and Attitudes Among Minnesota Dental Hygienists: A pilot study
  • Efficacy of a Revised Prototype Solution to Facilitate the Removal of Dental Calculus: A follow-up proof-of-concept study
Show more Research

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • porphyromonas gingivalis
  • fusobacterium species
  • candida species
  • streptococci
  • anaerobes
  • toothbrush

About

  • About ADHA
  • About JDH
  • JDH Reviewers
  • Contact Us

Helpful Links

  • Submit a Paper
  • Author Guidelines
  • FAQs

More Information

  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • Help

ISSN #: 1553-0205

Copyright © 2023 American Dental Hygienists’ Association

Powered by HighWire