Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archived Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisements
    • Subscribing
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • JDH Reviewers
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Permissions

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Dental Hygiene

Visit the American Dental Hygienists' Association's main website

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Journal of Dental Hygiene

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archived Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisements
    • Subscribing
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • JDH Reviewers
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Permissions
  • Visit jdenthyg on Facebook
  • Follow jdenthyg on Twitter
  • Follow jdenthyg on Instagram
  • Follow jdenthyg on Linkedin
  • RSS feeds
Research ArticleResearch

Patients' Perception of Pain During Ultrasonic Debridement: A Comparison Between Piezoelectric and Magnetostrictive Scalers

Kelly A. Muhney and Paul C. Dechow
American Dental Hygienists' Association September 2010, 84 (4) 185-189;
Kelly A. Muhney
RDH, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul C. Dechow
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Busslinger A,
    2. Lampe K,
    3. Beuchat M,
    4. Lehmann B
    . A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument. J Clin Periodontol. 2001;28(7):642-649.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jacobson L,
    2. Blomlöf J,
    3. Lindskog S
    . Root surface texture after different scaling modalities. Scand J Dent Res. 1994;102(3):156-160.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Flemmig TF,
    2. Petersilka GJ,
    3. Mehl A,
    4. Hickel R,
    5. Klaiber B
    . Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro. J Periodontol. 1998;69(5):547-553.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Flemmig TF,
    2. Petersilka GJ,
    3. Mehl A,
    4. Hickel R,
    5. Klaiber B
    . The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro. J Periodontol. 1998;25(2):158-163.
    OpenUrl
    1. Folwaczny M,
    2. Merkel U,
    3. Mehl A,
    4. Hickel R
    . Influence of parameters on root surface roughness following treatment with a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler: an in vitro study. J Periodontol. 2004;75(9):1221-1226.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jepsen S,
    2. Ayna M,
    3. Hedderich J,
    4. Eberhard J
    . Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31(11):1003-1006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kawashima H,
    2. Sato S,
    3. Kishida M,
    4. Ito K
    . A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo. J Periodontal Res. 2007;42(1):90-95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cross-Poline GN,
    2. Stach DJ,
    3. Newman SM
    . Effects of curet and ultrasonics on root surfaces. Am J Dent. 1995;8(3):131-133.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Derdilopoulou FV,
    2. Nonhoff J,
    3. Neumann K,
    4. Kielbassa AM
    . Microbiological findings after periodontal therapy using curettes, Er:YAG laser, sonic, and ultrasonic scalers. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34(7):588-598.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Braun A,
    2. Krause F,
    3. Nolden R,
    4. Frentzen M
    . Subjective intensity of pain during the treatment of periodontal lesions with the Vector-system. J Periodontal Res. 2003;38(2):135-140.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hoffman A,
    2. Marshall RI,
    3. Bartold PM
    . Use of the Vector scaling unit in supportive periodontal therapy: a subjective patient evaluation. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(10):1089-1093.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kocher T,
    2. Fanghänel J,
    3. Schwahn C,
    4. Rühling A
    . A new ultrasonic device in maintenance therapy: perception of pain and clinical efficacy. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(4):425-429.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kocher T,
    2. Rodemerk B,
    3. Fanghänel J,
    4. Meissner G
    . Pain during prophylaxis treatment elicited by two power-driven instruments. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(5):535-538.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Agras S,
    2. Sylvester D,
    3. Oliveau D
    . The epidemiology of common fears and phobia. Compr Psychiatry. 1969;10(2):151-156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Gatchel RJ,
    2. Ingersoll BD,
    3. Bowman L,
    4. Robertson MC,
    5. Walker C
    . The prevalence of dental fear and avoidance: a recent survey study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983;107(4):609-610.
    OpenUrlAbstract
    1. Abrahamsson KH,
    2. Berggren U,
    3. Carlsson SG
    . Psychosocial aspects of dental and general fears in dental phobic patients. Acta Odontol Scand. 2000;58(1):37-43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Edmondson HD,
    2. Roscoe B,
    3. Vickers MD
    . Biochemical evidence of anxiety in dental patients. Br Med J. 1972;4(5831):7-9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sohn W,
    2. Ismail AI
    . Regular dental visits and dental anxiety in an adult dentate population. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(1):58-66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. de Jongh A,
    2. Stouthard ME
    . Anxiety about dental hygienist treatment. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993;21(2):91-95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Brand HS
    . Cardiovascular responses in patients and dentists during dental treatment. Int Dent J. 1999;49(1):60-66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Karadottir H,
    2. Lenoir L,
    3. Barbierato B,
    4. et al
    . Pain experienced by patients during periodontal maintenance treatment. J Periodontol. 2002;73(5):536-542.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Chung DT,
    2. Bogle G,
    3. Bernardini M,
    4. Stephens D,
    5. Riggs ML,
    6. Egelberg JH
    . Pain experienced by patients during periodontal maintenance. J Periodontol. 2003;74(9):1293-1301.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Brand HS,
    2. van der Wal JH,
    3. Palmer-Bouva CC,
    4. de Vries DR
    . Cardiovascular changes during subgingival debridement. Int Dent J. 1997;47(2):110-114.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Aguiar A
    . Periodontal disease recognition: A review course for dental hygienists. UCLA School of Dentistry [Internet]. [cited 2008 September 12]. Available from: http://www.dent.ucla.edu/pic/members/pdr/classifications.html.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Dental Hygienists Association: 84 (4)
American Dental Hygienists' Association
Vol. 84, Issue 4
Fall 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Dental Hygiene.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patients' Perception of Pain During Ultrasonic Debridement: A Comparison Between Piezoelectric and Magnetostrictive Scalers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Dental Hygiene
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Dental Hygiene web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Patients' Perception of Pain During Ultrasonic Debridement: A Comparison Between Piezoelectric and Magnetostrictive Scalers
Kelly A. Muhney, Paul C. Dechow
American Dental Hygienists' Association Sep 2010, 84 (4) 185-189;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patients' Perception of Pain During Ultrasonic Debridement: A Comparison Between Piezoelectric and Magnetostrictive Scalers
Kelly A. Muhney, Paul C. Dechow
American Dental Hygienists' Association Sep 2010, 84 (4) 185-189;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Similar Articles

More in this TOC Section

  • Implementation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases by Clinical Dental Hygienists
  • Dental Hygiene Students’ Education and Intent to Use Recommended Communication Techniques
  • Dental Hygiene Student and Faculty Perspectives on Disposable vs. Traditional Local Anesthetic Syringes: A pilot study
Show more Research

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • scaling and root planing
  • piezoelectric
  • magnetostrictive
  • periodontal debridement
  • power driven scalers
  • calculus removal
  • ultrasonic scalers

About

  • About ADHA
  • About JDH
  • JDH Reviewers
  • Contact Us

Helpful Links

  • Submit a Paper
  • Author Guidelines
  • Permissions
  • FAQs

More Information

  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • Help

ISSN #: 1553-0205

Copyright © 2025 American Dental Hygienists’ Association

Powered by HighWire