Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials

References

1. 1. Whelton H

   . Overview of the impact of changing global patterns of dental caries experience on caries clinical trials. J Dent Res. 2004;83(spec iss): 29-34.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Mejàre I,
   2. Kallestal C,
   3. Stenlund H,
   4. Johansson H

   . Caries development from 11 to 22 years of age: a prospective radiographic study. Prevalence and distribution. Caries Res. 1998;32: 10-16.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 1. Ripa L,
   2. Leske G,
   3. Varma G

   . Longitudinal study of the caries susceptibility of occlusal and proximal surfaces of first permanent molars. J Public Health Dent. 1998;48: 8-13.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Whelton H,
   2. O'Mullane D,
   3. Cronin M

   . Survey of Oral Health of Children and Adolescents 1997-a report for the Mid-Western Health Board. Limerick (Ireland): Mid Western Health Board; 1998. three-letter_month_if_anyday_if_any.
5. 1. Corona M,
   2. Borsatto C,
   3. Garcia L

   . Randomized controlled trial comparing the retention of flowable composite system with a conventional fissure sealant: one year follow up. Int J Ped Dent. 2005;15: 44-50.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Takahashi Y,
   2. Imazato S,
   3. Russel R,
   4. Noiri Y,
   5. Ebisu S

   . Influence of resin monomers on growth of oral streptococci. J Dent Res. 2004;83(4): 302-306.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 1. Preetha V,
   2. Shashikiran N,
   3. Reddy V

   . Comparison of antibacterial properties of two fluoride-releasing and a non-fluoride-releasing pit and fissure sealants. Ind Soc of Ped and Prev Dent. 2007;25: 133-136.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Brown J,
   2. Barkmeie W

   . A comparison of six enamel treatment procedures for sealant bonding. Pediatr Dent. 1996;18: 29-31.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. 1. Kersten S,
   2. Lutz F,
   3. Schabpach P

   . Fissure sealing: optimization of sealant penetration and sealing properties. Am J Dent. 2001;14: 127-131.

   OpenUrlPubMed
10. 1. Poulsen S,
    2. Beiruti N,
    3. Sadat N

    . A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass ionomer and resin-based sealant. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001;29: 289-301.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 1. Beiruti N,
    2. Frencken J,
    3. Helderman W

    . Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of a composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years. Caries Res. 2006;40(1): 52-59.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 1. Croll T

    . Glass ionomer for infants, children and adolescents. JADA. 1990;120(1): 65-68.

    OpenUrlAbstract
13. 1. Fross H,
    2. Saarni U,
    3. Seppa L

    . Comparison of glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a2-year clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epedemiol. 1994;22(1): 21-34.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Songpaisan Y,
    2. Bratthal D,
    3. Phantumvanit

    . Effects of glass ionomer cements, resin-based fissure sealants and HF application on occlusal caries in developing country field trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1995;23(1): 25-29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. 1. Raadal M,
    2. Utkilen AB,
    3. Nilsen OL

    . Fissure sealing with a light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement (Vitrebond) compared with a resin sealant. Int J Pediatr Dent. 1996;6(4): 235-239.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Mckenna E,
    2. Grundy G

    . Glass ionomer cement fissure sealants applied to operative dental auxiliaries--retention rate after one year. Aust Dent J. 1987;32(3): 200-203.

    OpenUrlPubMed
17. 1. Ganesh M,
    2. Tandon S

    . Clinical evaluation of FUJI VII sealant material. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2006;31(1): 52-57.

    OpenUrlPubMed
18. 1. Mallmann A,
    2. Ataíde JC,
    3. Amoedo R,
    4. Rocha PV,
    5. Jacques LB

    . Compressive strength of glass ionomer cements using different specimen dimensions. Braz Oral Res. 2007;21(3): 204-8.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. 1. Mitra SP

    . Adhesion to dentine and physical proberties of a light-cured glass ionomer liner\base. J Dent Res. 1991;70: 72-74.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 1. Gungor H,
    2. Altay N,
    3. Alpar R

    . Clinical evaluation of a poly-modified resin composite- based fissure sealant: two year results. Oper Dent. 2004;29(3): 254-260.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. 1. Pardi V,
    2. Periera AC,
    3. Meneghem C

    . Clinical evaluation of three different materials used as pit and fissure sealants: 24 month results. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005;29(2): 133-137.

    OpenUrlPubMed
22. 1. Czemer A,
    2. Weiller M,
    3. Ebert J

    . Wear resistance of flowable composites as pit and fissure sealants. J Dent Res. 2000;79: 279-(abstract 1087).

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Autio-Gold J

    . Clinical evaluation of medium-filled flowable restorative materials as a pit and fissure sealant. Oper Dent. 2002;27(4): 325-329.

    OpenUrlPubMed
24. 1. Matalon S,
    2. Slutzky H,
    3. Weiss E

    . Surface antibacterial properties of packable resin composite: part I. Quintes Int. 2004;35(3): 189-193.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Slutsky H,
    2. Weiss E,
    3. Liwinstein I,
    4. Slutzky S,
    5. Matalon S

    . Surface antibacterial properties of resin and resin-modefied dental cements. Quintes Int. 2007;38(1): 55-61.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Menon T,
    2. Kumar C,
    3. Dinesh K

    . Antibacterial activity of glassionomer restorative cements and polyacid modified composite resin against cariogenic bacteria. Ind J Med Micr. 2006;24(2): 150-151.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Word Health Organization

    . WHO Basic Oral Health Survey, 4th edition. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
28. 1. Boksman L,
    2. Carson B

    . Two-year retention and caries rate of Ultraseal XT and Fluoroshield light-cured pit and fissure sealant. Gen Dent. 1998;46: 184-187.

    OpenUrlPubMed
29. 1. Ogaard B,
    2. Arends J,
    3. Helseth J

    . Fluoride level in saliva after bonding orthodontic brackets with a fluoride containing adhesive. Am Orthod Detofac Orthoped. 1997;58: 206-213.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Gold O,
    2. Jordan H,
    3. Van haut J

    . Selective medium for streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol. 1973;18: 1357-1364.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 1. Notle W

    . Streptococci: in:Oral microbiology with basic microbiology and immunology. (edition4thed). St. Louis (MO): C.V Mobsy Company; 1982. 28- 326.
32. 1. Norusis MJ

    . SPSS\PC+ statistics 7.5 for the IBM PC\XT\AT and PS\2. Chicago (IL): SPSS Incorporated; 1996.
33. 1. Periera AC,
    2. Pardi V,
    3. Mialhe FL

    . A 3-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements used as fissure sealants. Am J Dent. 2003;16(1): 23-27.

    OpenUrlPubMed
34. 1. Smales R,
    2. Wrong KC

    . 2-year clinical performance of a resin-modefied glass ionomer sealant. Am J Dent. 1999;12(2): 59-61.

    OpenUrlPubMed
35. 1. Mejare A,
    2. Major I

    . Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealans: a clinical study. Scand J Dent Res. 1990;98: 345-350.

    OpenUrlPubMed
36. 1. Mclean J,
    2. Wilson A

    . Fissure sealing and filling with an adhesive glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J. 1974;136: 269-276.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
37. 1. Klipatrick M,
    2. Murray J,
    3. McCbet F

    . A clinical comparison of a light cured glass ionomer sealant restorstion with a composite sealant restoration. J Dent. 1996;24: 399-405.

    OpenUrlPubMed
38. 1. Fross H,
    2. Halme E

    . Retention of a glass ionomer cement and resi-based sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998;26: 21-25.

    OpenUrlPubMed
39. 1. Hicks HJ,
    2. Flaitz CM

    . Occlusal caries formation in vitro: Comparison of rein-modefied glass ionomer with fluoride-releasing sealant. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2000;24(4): 309-314.

    OpenUrlPubMed
40. 1. Mark M,
    2. Edward J,
    3. Jeffery A

    . Using rein-modefied glass ionomer as an occlusal sealant:A on-year clinical study. JADA. 1996;127: 1508-1514.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
41. 1. Hansel C,
    2. Leyhausen C,
    3. Mai U,
    4. Geurtsen W

    . Effects of various resin composite (co) monomers and extracts on two caries-associated microorganisms in vitro. J Dent Res. 1998;77(1): 60-67.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
42. 1. Karanika-Kouma A,
    2. Dionysopoulos P,
    3. Koliniotou-Koubia E

    . Antibacterial p[roperties of dentin bonding systems, polyacid-modefied composite resins and composite resins. J Rehab. 2001;28: 157-160.

    OpenUrl
43. 1. Svanberg M,
    2. Mjor I,
    3. Qrstavik D

    . Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite and glass ionomer restorations. J Dent Res. 1990;69(3): 861-864.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
44. 1. Going R

    . Sealant effect on incipient caries enamel maturation and future caries susceptibility. J Dent Educ. 1984;48: 35-41.

    OpenUrlPubMed
45. 1. Savarino L,
    2. Cervellati M,
    3. Stea S,
    4. Cavedagna D,
    5. Donati M

    . In vitro investigation of aluminum and fluoride release from compomers, conventional and resin modified glassionomer cements: a standardized approach. J Biomater Sci Polym. 2000;11: 289-300.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Sturr M,
    2. Marquis R

    . Inhibition of proton-trans and aluminum locating ATPases of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus casei by fluoride. Arch Microbiol. 1990;155: 22-27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
47. 1. Hayacibara M,
    2. Rosa O,
    3. Koo H

    . Effects of fluoride and aluminum from ionomeric materials on S. mutans Biofilm. J Dent Res. 2003;82(4): 267-271.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
48. 1. Loyola-Rodrigues J,
    2. Garcia-Godoy F

    . Antibacterial activity of fluoride releasing sealant on mutans streptococci. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1996;20: 109-111.

    OpenUrlPubMed
49. 1. Friedle K,
    2. Schmalz G,
    3. Hiller K

    . Liquid culture tests of the effect of dental materials on bacterial growth. Dtsch Zahnartztl. 1992;47: 826-831.

    OpenUrl
50. 1. Imazato S,
    2. McCabe J,
    3. Tarumi H,
    4. Ehara A,
    5. Ebisu S

    . Degree of conversion of composites measured by DTA and FTIR. Dent Mater. 2001;17: 178-183.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 1. Takahashi Y,
    2. Imazato S,
    3. Russel R,
    4. Noiri Y,
    5. Ebisu S

    . Influence of resin monomers on growth of oral streptococci.. J Dent Res. 2004;83(4): 302-306.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
52. 1. Van Dijkin J,
    2. Persson S,
    3. Sjostrom S

    . Presence of streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli in saliva and on enamel, glass ionomer cements, and composite resin surfaces. Scand J Dent Res. 1991;99: 13-19.

    OpenUrlPubMed
53. 1. Van Haute J

    . Mechanisms and implications. Microbiol Abstr. 1976;1: 2-32.

    OpenUrl
54. 1. Thornton J,
    2. Retief D,
    3. Bradley E

    . Fluoride release from and tensile bond strength of Ketac-Fil and Ketak-Silver to enamel and dentine. Dent Mater. 1986;2: 241-245.

    OpenUrlPubMed