Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisements
    • Subscribing
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • JDH Reviewers
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Dental Hygiene
Visit the American Dental Hygienists' Association's main website
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Journal of Dental Hygiene

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisements
    • Subscribing
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • JDH Reviewers
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Visit jdenthyg on Facebook
  • Follow jdenthyg on Twitter
  • Follow jdenthyg on Instagram
  • Follow jdenthyg on Linkedin
  • RSS feeds
Research ArticleResearch article

Safety and Efficacy of Antimicrobial Mouthrinses in Clinical Practice

Louis G. DePaola and Ann Eshenaur Spolarich
American Dental Hygienists' Association December 2007, 81 (suppl 1) 117;
Louis G. DePaola
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann Eshenaur Spolarich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Efficacy Overview. The use of an antimicrobial mouthrinse is an important adjunct to toothbrushing and interdental cleaning. To varying degrees, chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), and essential oils (EO) interrupt the integrity of the bacterial cell membrane, leading to lysis and death. CHG binds to salivary mucins, tooth structure, dental plaque, and oral soft tissues and is released slowly into the mouth, where it inhibits adsorption of bacteria onto teeth. CHG is active against a wide range of gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms. CPC binds to teeth and plaque to a lesser degree than CHG and is generally less efficacious than CHG. CHG and EO penetrate plaque biofilm and produce changes in microbial cell surface morphology that alter coaggregation, recolonization, and, thus, survival. CHG, CPC, and EO are active against a wide variety of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. An overview of the Food and Drug Administration and American Dental Association rigorous approval processes for efficacy and safety is provided.

Safety Overview. Long-term use of CHG or EO does not adversely affect the ecology of oral microbial flora, including microbial overgrowth, opportunistic infection, or development of microbial resistance. Long-term use of CHG, CPC, or EO does not contribute to soft tissue lesions or mucosal aberrations and has no serious adverse effect on salivary flow, taste, tooth deposits, or dental restoration. There is no evidence of a causal link between alcohol-containing mouthrinses and the risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer.

  • Antimicrobial mouthrinse
  • efficacy
  • gingivitis
  • mechanism of action
  • safety
  • Copyright © 2007 The American Dental Hygienists' Association
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Dental Hygienists Association: 81 (suppl 1)
American Dental Hygienists' Association
Vol. 81, Issue suppl 1
Fall Supplement 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Dental Hygiene.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Safety and Efficacy of Antimicrobial Mouthrinses in Clinical Practice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Dental Hygiene
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Dental Hygiene web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Safety and Efficacy of Antimicrobial Mouthrinses in Clinical Practice
Louis G. DePaola, Ann Eshenaur Spolarich
American Dental Hygienists' Association Dec 2007, 81 (suppl 1) 117;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Safety and Efficacy of Antimicrobial Mouthrinses in Clinical Practice
Louis G. DePaola, Ann Eshenaur Spolarich
American Dental Hygienists' Association Dec 2007, 81 (suppl 1) 117;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Similar Articles

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials
  • Mouthguards in the American Hockey League [AHL]
  • Survey of Diabetes Knowledge and Practices of Dental Hygienists
Show more Research article

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • Antimicrobial mouthrinse
  • efficacy
  • gingivitis
  • mechanism of action
  • safety

About

  • About ADHA
  • About JDH
  • JDH Reviewers
  • Contact Us

Helpful Links

  • Submit a Paper
  • Author Guidelines
  • FAQs

More Information

  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • Help

ISSN #: 1553-0205

Copyright © 2023 American Dental Hygienists’ Association

Powered by HighWire