Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of dental anxiety and missed dental appointments due to dental anxiety among patients within three types of private dental offices.
Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study utilized the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS). The MDAS consists of five questions to assess dental anxiety. Demographics and an open-ended question about missed dental appointments due to dental anxiety were included. Linear and logistic regression models were used to analyze anxiety scores as related to gender and age. Participants' responses to the open-ended question were compiled according to themes.
Results: Three hundred and eight (n=308) dental patients participated in the study. Using the MDAS cut-off scores of 15 and 19, the prevalence estimates of moderate to high and high dental anxiety within the total study population was 19% and 6.82% respectively. Females had an MDAS score 2.12 times higher than males (p<0.05). For every one unit increase in age, the MDAS score was 0.08 units lower (p<0.05). Out of the 308 participants, 26 (8.4%) responded to missing a dental appointment due to dental anxiety. Five common themes were coded as the source of dental anxiety: fear of dental experience, previous negative dental experience, cost of treatment, gag reflex, and fear of bad news.
Conclusions: Moderate to high dental anxiety was present in 19% of the population sampled. Awareness of patients' dental anxiety level and the utilization of anxiety reducing measures during treatment may encourage routine care.
Introduction
Dental anxiety is characterized by a physical and/or emotional response to a perceived threat.1 This threat does not always have to be physically present, as the mere idea of an uncomfortable situation can provoke feelings of uneasiness and apprehension.1 In the dental office setting, this perceived threat could be a painful injection or procedure, the discomfort of keeping one's mouth open for an extended period of time, or a lengthy and costly treatment plan. It is important to differentiate dental anxiety from fear and a phobia: fear is an emotional and/or physical response to what is perceived as a more distinct and immediate threat; phobia is associated with overwhelming feelings of fear that can cause a severe hindrance to daily activities.1 A study of 1,959 individuals comparing the prevalence of fears and phobias, such as snakes and physical injuries, identified dental fear present among 24.3% of the participants, fear of snakes was 34.8%, and fear of physical injuries was 27.2%.2
According to researchers, anywhere between 50 and 80% of adults in the United States have some degree of dental anxiety, ranging from mild to severe.1 More than 20% of dentally anxious patients do not see a dentist regularly, and anywhere from 9 to 15% of anxious patients avoid care altogether.1 A patients's perceptions may influence their level of anxiety.3 For example, if a patient expects pain during a scaling procedure, they are more likely to report highter anxiety levels.4 Additionally, there is an association between frequent gagging and higher anxiety levels.3 Research has also shown possible correlations between dental anxiety, missed appointments, avoidance of care, and a greater need for more extensive treatment.5-7 Avoidance of care refers to a refusal to seek care or to follow recommended treatment plans and can often result in a greater need for treatment.4,6
Dental Anxiety
In terms of high dental anxiety, research has shown the prevalence to range anywhere from 10 to 20% in adult populations.8-11 Humphris et al. examined the prevalence of dental anxiety among a representative sample (n=11,382) of adults aged 16 years and older from the general population in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS).8 They reported the prevalence of high dental anxiety in 11.6% of their study population.8 Two other studies from India and France suggest 46% of patients had some degree of dental anxiety; with 6 to 16% being moderately anxious, 17.33% being highly anxious, and 7 to 12.67% being extremely anxious.9,10 The overall prevalence reported was between 11.6 to 12.67%.8-10
Results from the aforementioned studies indicated that women tend to have greater anxiety than men, anxiety decreases with age, and those with higher anxiety receive less regular dental care.8-11 Also, those with previous negative dental experiences were more anxious than those with no history of previous negative experiences.8,9 Limitations include cross-sectional study designs, self-reported bias, and lack of generalizability; but apart from these limitations, a valid, reliable scale was used to assess dental anxiety.8-11
Use of Dental Anxiety Assessments
Since research has shown a possible correlation between dental anxiety and avoidance of care,5,-8, 10, 12 assessing anxiety prior to treatment would increase awareness for dental staff so that anxiety-reducing measures could be incorporated into patient care. Using the Level of Exposure Dental Experiences Questionnaire (LOE-DEQ) and the MDAS, Humphris and King determined that “extreme helplessness” during treatment was the most influential experience affecting anxiety levels and recommended the use of these questionnaires so the dental team can plan appropriate treatment patients with identified dental anxiety.13 It would seem appropriate to administer an anxiety assessment such as the MDAS to determine whether patients are suffering from dental anxiety, as research has shown it to be a valid, reliable scale.8, 9, 11, 14-17 Any concern that using these assessments may increase patients' anxiety prior to treatment is unfounded, as current research shows otherwise.18,19
A United Kingdom (UK) study by Dailey et al. revealed a lack of use of anxiety assessments among a relatively large sample of dentists.14 Of the 269 questionnaires included in the final analysis, the most frequently used assessment for adults was the MDAS; only 54 dentists (20%) used adult dental anxiety assessments, and only 31% of the 54 dentists used them often or always, while 69% used them sometimes or rarely.14 Studies in other countries have also supported the use of the MDAS in terms of reliability and validity.15-17 Even with its ease of use, it seems that dentists may not be regularly employing such a survey to assess anxiety among their patients.14
The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of dental anxiety among a convenience sample of patients within three types of dental offices: general, endodontic, and periodontal; to identify possible correlations between dental anxiety, age, gender, and missed appointments; and to reveal, in their own words, what patients feel is the source of their dental anxiety.
Methods and Materials
This cross-sectional study, approved by the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (MCPHS) University Institutional Review Board (IRB), assessed the level of dental anxiety and missed dental appointments due to anxiety among a convenience sample of patients in three different types of dental offices: a general dental office that offers sedation dentistry, an endodontic office, and a periodontal office, all located in Framingham, Massachusetts. Inclusion criteria included anyone over 18 years of age. Exclusion criteria included: those under age 18, those who were unable to read and write English, those who failed to provide consent, and those who failed to fully answer the questionnaires.
Informed consent was obtained and the ability to refuse to participate at any point during the study was provided along with the dental anxiety questionnaire. The questionnaire included demographic questions regarding the type of dental office age, gender, and level of dental anxiety. Figure 1 shows the MDAS, which was used to assess dental anxiety.11 Participants were asked to respond to the questions based on their level of agreement. Possible responses include: not anxious, slightly anxious, fairly anxious, very anxious, and extremely anxious.11 Using a Likert scale, not anxious is equal to a score of 1, slightly anxious is equal to a score of 2 and so on.11 The sum of all five questions can range from 5 to 25, with 5 being not anxious and 25 being extremely anxious.11 Any score of 19 or higher indicates a highly anxious patient.11 Similar research using this survey determined any score of 11 or higher indicative of moderate to high dental anxiety.9 One open-ended question was included to ask if patients had ever missed a dental appointment due to their anxiety and, if so, what they believed was the source of their dental anxiety.
Modified Dental Anxiety Scale: Scoring Instructions
Data collected from the survey was downloaded into Microsoft Excel and imported into STATA® statistical software version 11.2 for analysis. As per the survey responses, demographics including age, gender, and dental office type were enumerated using frequency percentiles and summary statistics. Differences in age and gender across dental office type were assessed via ANOVA and Fisher's Exact Test. Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) scores were tabulated for each survey. MDAS scores were assessed as both a linear continuous outcome and a binary outcome (MDAS score ≥19). Using the binary outcome (MDAS score ≥19) as an indicator of dental anxiety, dental anxiety prevalence across dental office types was enumerated with exact Binomial 95% Confidence Intervals. The prevalence of moderate to high dental anxiety (MDAS score >15) was determined as a percentage of the entire study population.
Univariate and multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between age and gender on MDAS scores (both continuous and binary). Qualitative analysis was used to analyze answers from the one open-ended question on missed appointments and dental anxiety. Themes were identified among all participants' answers and coded accordingly.
Results
There were a total of 308 participants; 200 from the general dental office, 99 from the endodontic office, and 9 from the periodontal office. Table I shows the demographic characteristics of the study population; 59% of participants were females; the mean age of the study population was approximately 52 years (SD 14.7 years) with an age range between 18 and 90 years. Mean MDAS score for the total study population was 10.19; with 10.06 from the general dental office, 10.59 from the endodontic office, and 9.22 from the periodontal office. Using the cut-off score of ≥19, the prevalence estimate of high dental anxiety within the total study population was 6.82% (Exact Binomial 95% CI: 4.27%-10.23%); 5% within the general dental office (Exact Binomial 95% CI: 2.42%-9.00%), 3.16% within the endodontic office (Exact Binomial 95% CI: 5.68%-19.01%), and 0% within the periodontal office (Exact Binomial 95% CI: 0.00%-33.63%). Using the cut-off score of >15, the percentage of participants with moderate to high dental anxiety was 19%.
Table II shows univariate and multivariate logistic regression models using the MDAS score as a binary variable based on the cut-off score of ≥19. As per the MDAS score ≥19 cutoff, the odds of dental anxiety is 3.19 (95% CI 1.05, 9.71) times greater for females than males. The univariate association between binary MDAS score and age was not found to be statistically significant. A multivariate logistic regression model includ-ing both gender and age showed little change in the estimated odds ratios for gender and age respectively, with additional controlfor office type showing little change with identical inference (odds ratio for gender 3.28; 95% CI 1.06, 10.01).
Demographic Characteristics of Study Population
Table III shows univariate and multivariate linear regression models for the MDAS scores when used as a continuous variable. Females had a mean MDAS score 2.12 points higher than males (95% CI 1.09, 3.15), with mean MDAS score 0.08 points lower for each one-year increase in age (95% CI −0.12, −0.05). A multivariate linear regression model including both age and gender showed little change in the estimated regression coefficients. Additionally controlling for office type showed little difference in the estimated regression coefficients for age and gender on mean MDAS score, leading to identical inference.
As per the qualitative analysis, 26 participants (8.4%) responded to missing a dental appointment due to dental anxiety; 17 from the general dental office, 8 from the endodontic office, and 1 from the periodontal office. Five common themes were coded as being the source of dental anxiety: fear of dental experience (8), previous negative dental experience (13), cost of treatment (2), gag reflex (1), and fear of bad news (2).
Discussion
The results of this study indicate there was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of high dental anxiety among different types of dental offices. This suggests the type of dental procedure being performed may not be a significant factor in terms of dental anxiety. The prevalence estimate of 6.82% for high dental anxiety among the study population is lower than expected when compared to other studies, which indicate a prevalence of 10-20%.8-11 However, the percentage of the study population with moderate to high dental anxiety (19%), suggests that a substantial portion of the patient population suffers from some degree of anxiety and would benefit from anxiety-reducing measures during treatment.
Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Models for MDAS≥19 vs MDAS<19 (n=308)
Similar to other research findings, this study found a statistically significant difference in dental anxiety between males and females, with females reporting higher levels of dental anxiety.8-10 This study also found that high dental anxiety decreases with increased age, which was similar to other findings.8-10 For participants who reported missing an appointment due to dental anxiety, a common theme among a majority of the participants was having had a previous negative dental experience as the source for their dental anxiety, similar to other research findings.13
There are several limitations to this study. The overall response rate of 308 is low; the response rate of 9 for the periodontal office is too low to draw any significant conclusions for this type of office specifically and also makes it difficult to compare data between the three offices. The mean age of the patients was 52 years, suggesting that young adults and elderly populations may not have been adequately represented in this sample. Participants were not asked if it was their first visit to the office and those who were new patients may have been more likely to feel anxious compared to those who had been receiving care at a familiar office for a period of time. All three offices were located in one community, making it difficult to generalize results to other populations. Another limitation is the cross-sectional design of the study, which does not allow for causality to be shown. Also, studies such as this one, using self-reported data, are likely to introduce bias into the study results, as participants may not answer questions honestly or may misunderstand what a question is asking.
Univariate and Multivariate Linear Regression Models for MDAS score (n=308)
Suggestions for future research include longitudinal studies to examine possible correlations between gender, age, socioeconomic status and dental anxiety. It is important to survey those who do not regularly seek care at dental offices, as research suggests that those with high dental anxiety may avoid regular care altogether.3-5 For this reason, it would be beneficial to reach out to a larger segment of the population; not limited to those who are actually arriving for treatment at a dental office. Further research should also be conducted to examine possible correlations between dental anxiety and missed appointments, as well as whether the use of dental anxiety assessments in dental offices improves patient outcomes. A qualitative research design could provide a deeper understanding of sources of dental anxiety as well as anxiety-reducing measures that patients feel would lover their dental anxiety.
Conclusion
Although it may be helpful to assess the prevalence of dental anxiety among a more representative sample of the population as in previous studies,8-11 dental offices may directly benefit from assessing the prevalence of anxiety among their patient population. Dental hygienists are in a unique position to assess patient comfort and to educate patients on dental anxiety and coping mechanisms. Anxiety assessments such as the MDAS are arguably an easy, reliable way to assess dental anxiety so that care can be more patient-centered and effective. Being aware of patients' anxiety may contribute to the dental professionals' establishment of a trusting rapport and thus encourage routine care in an effort to help patients maintain optimal oral health.
Footnotes
Angela M. White, RDH, MS, is a graduate of the Master of Science program at the Forsyth School of Dental Hygiene, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lori Giblin, RDH, MS, is an Assistant Professor and Linda J. Boyd, RDH, RD, EdD, is a Professor and Dean at the Forsyth School of Dental Hygiene, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts.
This manuscript supports the NDRHA priority area, Client level: Oral health care (new therapies and prevention modalities).
- Copyright © 2017 The American Dental Hygienists’ Association
