<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org">
<title>American Dental Hygienists Association recent issues</title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org</link>
<description>American Dental Hygienists Association RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>American Dental Hygienists Association</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1553-0205</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/4.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/6.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/10.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/23.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/34.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/45.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/54.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/67.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/76.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/4.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/6.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/19.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/36.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/47.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/58.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/68.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/75.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/4.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/6.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/10.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/21.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/34.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/47.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/59.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/68.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/75.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/4.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/6.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/9.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/20.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/33.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/45.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/57.short?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/65.short?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/4.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Honoring Our Legacy While Shaping Our Future: 100 Years of Dental Hygiene Research]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/4.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica August]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-10-04T18:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/5/4</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Honoring Our Legacy While Shaping Our Future: 100 Years of Dental Hygiene Research]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Guest Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>5</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>5</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/6.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Beyond the Smile: The Link Between Oral and Systemic Health]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/6.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kimberly Milleman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-10-04T18:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/5/6</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beyond the Smile: The Link Between Oral and Systemic Health]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Guest Commentary</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>9</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>5</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/10.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advancing Dental Hygiene Practice: Regulatory, educational, and policy pathways]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/10.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Developments in dental hygiene (DH) practice over the past decade have influenced the professional landscape, particularly regarding scope of practice (SOP), access to care, and workforce utilization. The purpose of this study was to explore how recent regulatory changes, care delivery innovations, and technological advancements have impacted DH practice, identify persistent barriers, and recommend strategies to advance DH SOP.Methods This qualitative study employed semi-structured key informant interviews with national DH leaders. Purposive sampling was used to recruit members of the American Dental Hygienists’ Association Board of Directors to ensure diverse expertise and leadership perspectives. Five of the 15 invited participants were enrolled in the study. Virtual interviews were conducted in May and June 2025. Transcripts were verified for accuracy and analyzed using thematic analysis with both deductive and inductive coding approaches.Results Four primary themes emerged: 1) regulatory constraints and representation on dental boards, 2) barriers to care delivery in underserved communities, 3) impact of technology, and 4) strategic recommendations for expanding SOP. Participants described significant variation in state laws, limited DH representation on dental boards, and a disconnect between education and legal practice authority. Regulatory barriers were reported to constrain care delivery in community-based settings. Technological innovations, including teledentistry and digital diagnostics, were viewed as enhancing care but limited by cost and reimbursement challenges. Key recommendations included establishing independent DH regulatory boards; expanding educational pathways to enhance professional recognition and care capacity; advancing licensure portability through interstate compacts; and increasing Medicaid reimbursement and direct reimbursement to dental hygienists.Conclusion Despite progress in DH practice and innovation, regulatory variability and structural barriers continue to limit professional autonomy and access to preventive oral health services. Coordinated policy reform is needed to fully leverage dental hygienists as essential contributors to a prevention-focused oral health system.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theekshana Fernando, Sage Shirey, Simona Surdu, Jean Moore]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-10-04T18:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/5/10</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advancing Dental Hygiene Practice: Regulatory, educational, and policy pathways]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>22</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>5</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/23.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Relationship Between Effort-Reward Imbalance and Intention to Leave Among Dental Hygienists]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/23.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Dental hygienists have been leaving clinical practice, creating shortages and impacting the quality of patient care. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between effort-reward imbalance (ERI) and dental hygienists’ turnover intention.Methods A cross-sectional electronic survey was used to measure the perception of ERI and intent to leave among a convenience sample of clinical dental hygienists. Validated instruments used were the ERI and Turnover Intention Scale (TIS). Statistical analysis included descriptive, correlation, and regression modeling.Results A total of 315 participants opened the survey; the completion rate was 72.4% (n = 228). Most participants agreed that their jobs have become increasingly demanding (75.9%, n = 173) and felt that their job promotion prospects were poor (81.6%, n = 186). No statistically significant correlations were found among demographic variables and ERI or intent to leave. However, all ERI subscales emerged as significant predictors of intent to leave; reward (β = −0.670, SE = 0.075, p < .001), overcommitment (β = 0.278, SE = 0.088, p = 0.002), and effort (β = 0.332, SE = 0.153, p = 0.030).Conclusion Dental hygienists who are experiencing higher ERI in the workplace are more inclined to leave. Reward (i.e., respect, recognition, and compensation) was the strongest negative predictor of intent to leave, indicating that reward is predictive of retention in the workplace. Conversely, higher effort and overcommitment predicted intention to leave.Understanding factors related to an imbalance between effort and reward in the dental setting is key for retaining dental hygienists in the workforce. This knowledge may assist employers in developing targeted interventions to improve retention and attract qualified candidates.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Lynne E. Frei, Linda D. Boyd, Emily McCleary]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-10-04T18:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/5/23</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relationship Between Effort-Reward Imbalance and Intention to Leave Among Dental Hygienists]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>33</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>5</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/34.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of Abusive Supervision with Psychological Distress and Turnover Intention Among Clinical Dental Hygienists]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/34.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Negative workplace culture has been shown to be a common reason for dental hygienists to leave clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to examine abusive supervision (AS) and its relationship with dental hygienists’ psychological distress and turnover intention.Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted online with a non-probability sample of clinical dental hygienists in the United States and Canada, recruited via social media. The validated instruments included the Tepper AS scale, the Kessler psychological distress scale (K6), and the Turnover Intention Scale (TIS-6). Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and regression modeling were used to analyze the data.Results A total of 258 participants opened the survey; the completion rate was 53% (n = 137). A majority of the participants (81%) reported experiencing AS with varying frequency. No demographic variables were found to be statistically significant predictors of AS and intention to leave; however, regression modeling identified psychological distress (β = .27, p < .001) and AS (β = .52, p < .001) as predictors of turnover intention. Abusive supervision was stronger in predicting turnover intention than psychological distress (R2 = .49, p < .001).Conclusion Based on the study findings, abusive supervision is prevalent and a strong predictor of turnover intention among clinical dental hygienists, indicating that this is a significant professional issue. Employers should recognize and mitigate abusive behavior to establish a positive workplace environment to increase retention and enhance overall patient care.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caroline Hope, Linda D. Boyd, Jared Vineyard, Bianca Capozzi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-10-04T18:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/5/34</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of Abusive Supervision with Psychological Distress and Turnover Intention Among Clinical Dental Hygienists]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>44</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>5</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/45.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dental Hygiene Educator Workforce Shortage: A review of the literature]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/45.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Oral health care education programs are facing challenges extending beyond isolated hiring difficulties that reflect broader structural forces shaping the academic workforce. The purpose of this literature review was to examine the structural factors contributing to the dental hygiene faculty shortage and to identify evidence-based strategies that support sustainable recruitment and retention in oral health education programs.Methods A literature search was conducted using CINAHL, PubMed, ERIC, and Google Scholar. Search terms included: dental hygiene faculty shortage, health professions education workforce, faculty burnout, workload equity, compensation models, and mentoring in health sciences education. Inclusion criteria consisted of peer-reviewed articles published between 2010-2026 that addressed workforce trends, faculty recruitment and retention, accreditation or credentialing requirements, workload models, or the integration of educational technologies. Opinion pieces without empirical or conceptual grounding were excluded.Results Forty-three articles met the inclusion criteria and were synthesized to identify common structural themes and recommended interventions. Across the literature, four dominant structural contributors to the faculty shortage emerged: compensation disparities between clinical and academic roles, limited graduate education pathways, accreditation and credentialing constraints, and unsustainable workload expectations. Studies also highlighted high levels of burnout, turnover intention, and employment instability among health science faculty. Evidence supported the effectiveness of comprehensive compensation models, structured mentoring and onboarding, equitable workload distribution, and the use of emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, to reduce administrative burden.Conclusion Faculty shortages in dental hygiene were shown to be driven by structural, rather than isolated, factors. Programs that rely heavily on part-time faculty experience greater workload imbalance and burnout among full-time educators. Interventions that integrate compensation reform, workload equity, mentoring, and educational technologies offer the greatest potential to stabilize the dental hygiene educator pipeline. Addressing these factors is essential for maintaining accreditation compliance, ensuring instructional quality, and supporting long-term workforce sustainability in dental hygiene education programs.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joni M. Hamilton, Suzanne K. Thompson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-10-04T18:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/5/45</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dental Hygiene Educator Workforce Shortage: A review of the literature]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Critical Issues in Dental Hygiene</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>53</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>5</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/54.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[AI-Assisted Rubric-Based Essay Grading in Dental Hygiene Education: A retrospective observational study]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/54.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Assessment of reflective and professionalism-focused writing is a critical component of health professions education; competencies such as ethical reasoning, communication, and self-awareness are foundational to professional identity formation and clinical readiness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the consistency of a large language model (LLM) in rubric-based grading of reflective essays in dental hygiene education, compare agreement patterns and systematic differences between artificial intelligence (AI) and faculty grading, and examine its potential to support faculty-driven assessment processes.Methods Deidentified, archived reflective essays from first-year dental hygiene student cohorts (2022–2024; N = 90) were regraded using a secure, institutionally managed AI program (ChatGPT, Model 4o). Essays were originally assessed by faculty using a standardized rubric and re-evaluated by the LLM using identical criteria. Faculty and AI scores were compared overall and by domain using paired statistical tests. Grading time was recorded, and test–retest reliability was evaluated across three independent scoring runs.Results Domain-level analyses required complete rubric data across all five domains; because of incomplete rubric data, 77 submissions (N = 77) were included in domain-level analyses. Faculty assigned significantly higher overall scores than the AI system (p < 0.001), with an average difference of approximately 1.9 points on a 10-point scale. Significant differences were found in four of the five rubric domains. Artificial intelligence grading was rapid, averaging approximately 39 seconds per essay, and demonstrated strong internal consistency across repeated evaluations (ICC = 0.87). The AI scores showed greater dispersion and more conservative scoring patterns, whereas faculty scores demonstrated ceiling effects.Conclusion Artificial intelligence-based grading demonstrated strong reproducibility and rapid evaluation, with systematic differences in score calibration compared with faculty assessment. The use of AI may complement faculty-driven assessment by supporting consistent, scalable grading practices in dental hygiene education, potentially enhancing grading reliability while reducing faculty workload.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courtney D. Routh, Richard Halpin, J. Nathaniel Holland, Tulsi Patel]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-10-04T18:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/5/54</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[AI-Assisted Rubric-Based Essay Grading in Dental Hygiene Education: A retrospective observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Innovations in Dental Hygiene Education</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>54</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>66</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>5</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/67.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing Changes in Attitudes Toward Collaborative Practice Among Dental Hygiene Students: A quasi-experimental study of interprofessional hospital rotations]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/67.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Interprofessional education is an essential component of dental hygiene education; however, limited research has examined the impact of hospital-based interprofessional experiences across stages of training. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a hospital rotation on dental hygiene students’ perceptions of collaborative practice, including teamwork, roles and responsibilities, and patient-centered care.Methods A quasi-experimental pre–post design study was conducted using a nonprobability convenience sample of first- and second-year dental hygiene students enrolled in a single program. First-year students had no exposure to the hospital rotation, whereas second-year students had completed an interprofessional hospital-based rotation. Data were collected at baseline (beginning of the academic year) and post-intervention (end of the academic year) using the validated Student Perception Interprofessional Clinical Education Instrument (SPICE-R2). Descriptive statistics were calculated, and inferential analyses included independent-samples t-tests and a two-way mixed analysis of variance. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Results At baseline, second-year participants reported significantly higher perceptions related to role clarity, understanding of other health professionals’ training requirements, patient satisfaction, and health care cost reduction. Post-intervention comparisons demonstrated fewer group differences; however, second-year students continued to report significantly greater understanding of professional roles and stronger perceptions of patient-centered collaborative care. No significant differences were observed for perceptions related to teamwork ability.Conclusion Interprofessional hospital-based rotations may enhance dental hygiene students’ understanding of professional roles and patient-centered collaborative practice. These findings support the integration of structured interprofessional clinical experiences within dental hygiene curricula to promote competency development aligned with accreditation standards and prepare graduates for collaborative practice.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah B. Hoerler, Cherie L. Fritz]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-10-04T18:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/5/67</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing Changes in Attitudes Toward Collaborative Practice Among Dental Hygiene Students: A quasi-experimental study of interprofessional hospital rotations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Innovations in Dental Hygiene Education</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>75</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>5</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/76.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Radiographic Identification of Gold Threading: A clinical case study]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/5/76.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dental hygienists play a crucial role in oral health care through the acquisition and interpretation of radiographs. Certain cosmetic facial procedures involving metallic materials may be visible on dental radiographs. These materials may obscure anatomical structures and complicate interpretation, which is essential for dental procedure treatment planning. The dental hygienist needs to be able to differentiate these artifacts from pathological conditions. This case study describes a 28-year-old female patient with intraoral and extraoral radiographs demonstrating thread-like radiopacities consistent with gold threading. This report highlights the radiographic characteristics of gold threading, outlines clinical implications, and emphasizes the importance of professional awareness of cosmetic facial procedures that may influence radiographic image interpretation and complicate accurate dental hygiene care planning.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annette K. Stelter]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-10-04T18:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/5/76</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Radiographic Identification of Gold Threading: A clinical case study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical Case Study</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>76</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>80</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>5</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/4.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chairside Curiosity: A journey through research to innovation]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/4.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michele Lash]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-04T05:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/4/4</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chairside Curiosity: A journey through research to innovation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Guest Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>5</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>4</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/6.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Relationship Between Work-Life Balance, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention Among Dental Hygienists]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/6.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose There is limited research regarding how work-life balance (WLB) affects job satisfaction, and intention to leave among dental hygienists in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between WLB, job satisfaction, and turnover intention among dental hygienists.Methods This study used a cross-sectional research design with a convenience sample of dental hygienists (n=274) recruited via social media. The web-based survey consisted of demographics and work characteristics, followed by three previously validated survey instruments: WLB Measure, Job Satisfaction Questionnaire (JSQ), and Turnover Intention Scale (TIS). Descriptive, correlational, and inferential analyses were used.Results The survey completion rate was 76% (n = 209). Participants reported an average WLB of 3.20 (SD = 1.06) and an average JSQ of 3.54 (SD = 0.67) on a scale of 1 to 5. Additionally, participants reported an average TIS of 16.75 (SD = 6.22) on a scale of 6 to 30. A regression analysis with WLB, JSQ, and covariates was done to identify predictors of turnover intention. The model predicted 63% (adjusted R2 = 0.63, F (7, 200) = 47.33, p < .001) of the variance in turnover intention. Lower job satisfaction (JSQ; β = −0.65, t = −13.86, p < .001) and WLB (β = −0.21, t = −3.97, p < .001) predicted higher turnover intention.Conclusion Findings suggested both job satisfaction and WLB were predictors of an employee’s turnover intention or intention to leave. These results suggest employers should consider their role in employees’ overall WLB, and job satisfaction, considering factors such as workload, communication, opportunities for advancement, and adequate recognition to retain dental hygienists.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angela Metrano, Linda D. Boyd, Emily McCleary, Mariah Wilkerson]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-04T05:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/4/6</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Relationship Between Work-Life Balance, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention Among Dental Hygienists]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>4</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/19.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Retraction of Dentally Related Articles (2004-2025): A descriptive study assessing the impact on oral hygiene and caries management literature]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/19.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential impact on science of post-retraction citations in oral hygiene and caries management literature by examining the characteristics of retracted dental articles.Methods The Retraction Watch Database was the data source used for the descriptive study. The database features lists and reports that identify retracted manuscripts. Retractions were characterized by author, year, location, and reason for the retraction. Articles pertaining to oral hygiene and caries management were retrieved, read, and evaluated according to the following criteria: 1) Presented a potential neutral or minimal impact (the citing article cited general background information from the retraction which was not inaccurate nor based on the results of the retracted manuscript); 2) Presented a potential major negative impact on influencing science (the citing article cited inaccurate information or information based on the retracted article); 3) Unable to determine (behind a paywall, in a study without dates of publication, or otherwise unavailable); or 4) Included a notation that the citation was from a retracted article.Results Of the 64,739 retractions listed in the database, there were 297 dentally related retracted publications (0.46% of all retractions and 0.017% of all dentally related articles published from 2004-2025). Twenty-eight retracted articles addressed oral hygiene and caries management. The 28 articles were cited in a total of 1179 articles with 347 post-retractions. Seventy-four post-retraction citations had a potentially major negative scientific impact, 106 had a potential minor impact, 6 had a notation that the reference being used had been retracted, and the remainder were unable to be evaluated.Conclusion There were relatively few dentally related retractions as a percentage of the total number of publications. However, authors who used retracted articles as citations created a potential negative impact on the presentation and sharing of dental research, specifically in oral hygiene and caries management research.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[R. Constance Wiener, Ruchi Bhandari]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-04T05:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/4/19</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Retraction of Dentally Related Articles (2004-2025): A descriptive study assessing the impact on oral hygiene and caries management literature]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>35</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>4</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/36.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Evaluation of the 15-item Food Frequency Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Dietary Habits Contributing to Periodontal Disease]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/36.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Dietary practices play a key role in chronic disease, and dental hygienists are well-positioned to provide person-centered care to enhance oral health and wellness, including nutritional counseling. The purpose of this study was to utilize the 15-item Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) and Diet Quality Score (DQS) to explore the correlation between diet, periodontal inflammation, and the risk of periodontal disease.Methods A total of 1,470 patients of record from the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry dental hygiene clinic were invited to participate in an electronic survey assessing food frequencies. Responses to the 15-item FFQ were assessed using the DQS and were combined with the participants’ bleeding on probing (BOP) and periodontal risk assessment (PRA) scores. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data.Results A response rate of 26% was observed (N = 379). There was a negative correlation between the percentage of BOP sites and DQS scores, indicating an inverse relationship between diet and periodontal inflammation (p = .001). A significant difference in average total DQS scores was found among PRA scores (p = 0.020). Specifically, the low PRA and moderate PRA groups demonstrated a significant difference (p = 0.017). Additionally, significant differences were observed in PRA scores (p < 0.001) and total DQS (p = 0.025), suggesting variations in the risk of periodontal disease and diet quality.Conclusion The use of a 15-item FFQ and a DQS can serve as an effective screening tool for dietary habits as they relate to periodontal inflammation, supporting dental hygienists in identifying dietary risk factors for periodontal disease.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna M. Franek, Keeley E. Flavin, Brian D. Hatch, Ziou Jiang, Yvette M. Reibel]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-04T05:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/4/36</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Evaluation of the 15-item Food Frequency Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Dietary Habits Contributing to Periodontal Disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>46</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>4</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/47.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence-Based Documentation in Dental Hygiene Clinical Education and Patient-Provider Connection: A pilot study]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/47.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Clinical documentation is a critical competency in dental hygiene (DH) education, yet its administrative burden often detracts from patient care. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the perceived impact of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) - assisted documentation system on student workflow efficiency and patient-provider connection to determine students’ perceived value of AI integration in the DH curriculum.Methods A prospective, pilot study was conducted with second-year DH students (n = 33) during the Spring 2025 term. Participants used an AI platform designed to convert real-time clinician-patient dialogue into structured notes. Data were collected via self-administered questionnaires at three intervals: baseline, mid-rotation (1 month), and post-rotation (3 months). Outcomes included perceived documentation efficiency, note quality, and patient-provider communication. Data were analyzed using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.Results Baseline data confirmed that traditional documentation hindered workflow (97.0%) and patient-provider connection (81.1%). While mid-rotation results showed only modest improvements, significant shifts occurred by the post-rotation period. Perceived documentation efficiency increased significantly (p = 0.014), with 48.0% of students reporting significant and extreme improvement. Perceived quality of patient connection also improved significantly (p = 0.038), particularly between the mid- and post-rotation phases (p = 0.016). Furthermore, satisfaction with note quality rose substantially (p = 0.005), and initial concerns about the transition to microphone-based recording shifted to broad acceptance.Conclusions Integration of AI-assisted documentation into DH education is highly valued by students. Benefits to efficiency and patient-provider connection emerge following a period of sustained clinical exposure. These findings suggest that AI tools can mitigate administrative burdens, allowing students to prioritize patient-centered care and clinical skill development.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leonardo M. Nassani, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira Fernandes, Nicole L. Buchanan, Zeinab Mohamed, Romana Muller, Sherrie Costello, Teresa Kania]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-04T05:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/4/47</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence-Based Documentation in Dental Hygiene Clinical Education and Patient-Provider Connection: A pilot study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Critical Issues in Dental Hygiene Education</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>57</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>4</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/58.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feedback Literacy Development in Dental Hygiene Education]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/58.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Feedback literacy is a pivotal concept in education. Students with well-developed feedback literacy are able to understand, interpret, and implement feedback effectively to improve learning and performance. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a feedback literacy course for dental hygiene students.Methods This study utilized a quantitative randomized control trial comprising a convenience sample of 42 dental hygiene students over two consecutive semesters. The control group received no formal feedback education, while the experimental group completed a feedback literacy module with an in-person feedback workshop, a follow-up in-person reflection activity, and online feedback literacy resources. Feedback Literacy was measured using the Feedback Literacy Scale, where participants self-rated their abilities on a Likert scale. A pre/posttest design was used, paired with supplemental open-ended questions for the experimental group to determine perceived program impact. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.Results Overall Feedback Literacy posttest mean scores of the experimental group (n = 21) were significantly higher (p < 0.001) when compared to controls (n = 21). The experimental group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in Appreciation of Feedback (p < .001), Positive Attitude toward Feedback (p = .001), and Openness to Feedback (p < .001). Four key concepts emerged from open-ended questions posed to experimental group, namely: valuing feedback, seeking feedback, managing emotions, and enhancing self-assessment.Conclusion Students may benefit from feedback literacy training delivered early in their education. The feedback literacy module helped students value feedback, use self-assessment to identify learning gaps, actively seek feedback, and regulate emotions during feedback.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyndee D. Harmon, Rachelle Williams, Crystal Kanderis-Lane]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-04T05:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/4/58</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feedback Literacy Development in Dental Hygiene Education]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Critical Issues in Dental Hygiene Education</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>58</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>67</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>4</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/68.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stannous Fluoride Toothpaste: Improving gingival health without a new habit adoption]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/68.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[Purpose Dental hygienists are uniquely positioned to improve oral and overall health outcomes with evidence-based treatment plans. One recommendation that has yet to see its full potential is the use of stannous fluoride (SnF2) toothpaste. Stannous fluoride is more than just an anticaries agent. Its formulation within a toothpaste offers superior performance in reducing plaque, gingivitis, sensitivity, halitosis, and tooth erosion, while maintaining the sulcular barrier integrity. However, most patients are unaware of these easily available benefits for oral health. This short report highlights the universal efficacy of SnF2 toothpaste, including significant reductions in gingival bleeding as compared with regular fluoride; reviews its proposed mechanisms, including antibacterial and antivirulence activity around teeth and implants as well as substructure remineralization; and explores its potential systemic health impact. The specific formulation of the toothpaste product also affects these factors, emphasizing the value of formulation-specific evidence to inform chairside recommendations. Including a well-formulated SnF2 toothpaste as part of daily oral hygiene leverages an existing behavior and reinforces proper habits for better oral health outcomes.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth A. Jordan, Adam E. Saltz]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-04T05:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/4/68</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stannous Fluoride Toothpaste: Improving gingival health without a new habit adoption]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short Report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>68</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>74</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>4</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/75.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biological Dental Hygiene: Principles, educational pathways, and clinical practice considerations]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/4/75.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dental hygiene practice is rapidly evolving in response to emerging evidence on the oral–systemic health connection, advances in preventive technologies, and increased emphasis on individualized, minimally invasive care. A commitment to lifelong learning and continuing professional development is essential for maintaining clinical competence and integrating new scientific knowledge into practice. Biological dental hygiene has emerged as a complementary framework that emphasizes whole-body health, biocompatibility, reduction of toxic exposures, and prevention-centered care. This approach expands traditional dental hygiene practice by incorporating enhanced risk assessment, salivary diagnostics, targeted preventive strategies, as well as patient education focused on nutrition, inflammation reduction, and systemic health influences. This short report describes the principles of biological dental hygiene and its clinical application, including minimally invasive periodontal therapy, risk-based preventive protocols, and the use of biocompatible materials and adjunctive technologies. It also reviews professional development opportunities through the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology and the International Academy of Biological Dentistry and Medicine, which provide structured educational programs, ongoing professional development opportunities, and advanced credentials in biologically oriented oral health care. While these certifications do not alter licensure scope of practice, they support professional development and interdisciplinary collaboration. Biological dental hygiene offers an expanded framework for integrating oral and systemic health considerations into preventive care. Continued engagement in evidence-informed education and professional certification may enhance patient education, clinical decision-making, and overall care delivery within dental hygiene practice.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tara Newcomb]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-08-04T05:34:44-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/4/75</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biological Dental Hygiene: Principles, educational pathways, and clinical practice considerations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-08-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short Report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>81</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>4</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/4.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Century of Science - A Future of Mentors]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/4.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michelle C. Arnett]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T10:51:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/3/4</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Century of Science - A Future of Mentors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Guest Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>5</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>3</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/6.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advancing the Dental Hygiene Research Foundation]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/6.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linda D. Boyd, Danielle Rulli]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T10:51:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/3/6</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advancing the Dental Hygiene Research Foundation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Guest Commentary</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>9</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>3</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/10.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Comparison of the Efficacy of Charcoal and Non-Charcoal-Bristled Electric Toothbrushes on Coffee Stain Removal and Surface Enamel Roughness: An in vitro study]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/10.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Recently, charcoal-based oral hygiene products, such as toothpastes, have gained popularity due to their whitening and antibacterial properties. However, there is limited data on charcoal-bristle electric toothbrushes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the coffee stain removal efficacy and enamel surface roughness induced by charcoal and non-charcoal electric toothbrushes with and without toothpaste.Methods Forty-eight prepared tooth enamel samples were divided into four groups: charcoal-electric toothbrush with toothpaste (group 1, n=12), non-charcoal electric toothbrush with toothpaste (group 2, n=12), charcoal-electric toothbrush without toothpaste (group 3, n=12), and non-charcoal electric toothbrush without toothpaste (group 4, n=12). Coffee stains were developed on the specimens, followed by a standardized brushing procedure. Various color parameters, ΔL* (whiteness), Δa* (redness), and Δb* (yellowness), were measured using a spectrophotometer. The ΔE* (color change) was calculated from the ΔL*, Δa*, and Δb* values. The enamel surface roughness (Ra) was evaluated using a 3D non-contact profilometer.Results All groups showed significant whitening (ΔL*), and groups with toothpastes demonstrated the most significant change in ΔE* values, irrespective of the bristle type (p<0.05). Both the bristle types effectively removed the coffee stains when used without toothpaste (p>0.05). However, groups with toothpaste exhibited significantly rougher enamel surfaces (p<0.05).Conclusion Both charcoal and non-charcoal electric toothbrushes effectively removed coffee stains. The toothpaste enhanced the whitening effect but increased enamel roughness. Charcoal-bristled electric toothbrushes did not outperform non-charcoal toothbrushes. Caution is warranted when using these products regularly due to potential surface alterations.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shilpa Ajai, Rupali Agnihotri]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T10:51:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/3/10</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Comparison of the Efficacy of Charcoal and Non-Charcoal-Bristled Electric Toothbrushes on Coffee Stain Removal and Surface Enamel Roughness: An in vitro study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>20</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>3</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/21.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dental Anxiety Management Techniques of North Carolina Dental Hygienists]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/21.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Dental anxiety is a prevalent condition, impacting adults, adolescents and children worldwide. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, confidence, and willingness to implement dental anxiety management techniques (DAMTs) by dental hygienists (DHs) in North Carolina (NC) as well as the types of DAMTs currently being used by DHs in NC.Methods This cross-sectional study utilized an electronic survey of DHs licensed to practice in NC. An email list provided by the NC Dental Board was used to invite all dental hygiene licentiates (N=7,732) to participate. The 32-item survey included multiple-choice, select-all, Likert-scale, and open-ended on the following categories: demographics, knowledge, education, clinical experience, confidence to treat, and willingness to implement DAMTs. Descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis (p<0.05), and thematic analysis were used for data interpretation.Results A total of 632 NC DHs completed the survey for a response rate of 8.17%. Most (99%, n=622) reported treating a patient with dental anxiety. Over one-third (36%, n=214) reported a lack of education on DAMTs at their educational institution and poor preparation in utilizing DAMTs post-education (4.90 on a 0-10 scale). Verbal DAMTs were more frequently learned during education by participants aged 18-34 compared to participants aged 55+ (p<0.0001). The most frequently recognized and utilized DAMTs were positive reinforcements (96.66%, n=578) and trust building (96.40%, n=536), followed by information (95.32%, n=570) and explanation (93.71%, n=521) and music (84.45%, n=505). Most reported confidence (99.45%, n=544) in treating patients with dental anxiety and willingness (99.25%, n=536) to modify care using DAMTs. Open-ended responses included trust, communication, empathy, and person-centered care.Conclusion Although participants reported regularly treating patients with dental anxiety, there was limited knowledge and utilization of the various types of DAMTs. Respondents expressed interest in continuing dental anxiety management education.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren Elizabeth Ryall, Mayank Shrivastava, Jeannie Ginnis, Jialiu Xie, Roxanne Dsouza-Norwood]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T10:51:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/3/21</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dental Anxiety Management Techniques of North Carolina Dental Hygienists]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>33</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>3</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/34.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of Dental Radiographs for Calculus Detection Post Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy: A scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/34.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Research has shown that calculus detection and removal present a persistent challenge in dentistry. The purpose of this scoping review was to determine the amount of literature regarding the use of dental radiographs for calculus detection and removal following nonsurgical periodontal therapy.Methods The following questions guided the review: 1) To what extent are radiographs incorporated into clinical practice for calculus detection and what factors influence their use or limitations? 2) What role do radiographs play in verifying the effectiveness of calculus removal during periodontal therapy? 3) Should a protocol or clinical guideline for use of dental radiographs post-nonsurgical periodontal therapy be considered? Following PRISMA guidelines, an online search of PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, JBI EBP Database, and Web of Science was conducted. Inclusion criteria were studies conducted on the presence of dental calculus, calculus detection, calculus removal and evaluation methods. Studies with a sample size of fewer than thirty, studies on implants, animals, in vitro studies, and research that did not include calculus detection or removal in the topic were excluded from the review.A total of 346 articles underwent title and abstract screening by three separate reviewers for assessment against the inclusion criteria for the review.Results A total of 59 studies met the inclusion criteria for the scoping review. Only two of the articles explicitly mentioned using radiographs to detect calculus. While a wide range of techniques were employed for calculus detection and removal, no single method was universally effective, and many studies acknowledged the persistent challenge of residual calculus post-nonsurgical periodontal treatment.Conclusion When combined with traditional calculus detection methods, the use of radiographs alone, or in combination with AI techniques, may prove beneficial post-nonsurgical periodontal therapy. While the concept of assessing subgingival calculus via radiographs is not novel, findings highlight a significant gap in the literature validating its effectiveness. Additionally, research on AI assisted radiographic calculus detection should be focused on in-vivo studies to reflect real scenarios and whether these techniques improve patient outcomes.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tasha A. Wendel, Rachael Lebo, Carissa Regnerus, Jessica Sona]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T10:51:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/3/34</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of Dental Radiographs for Calculus Detection Post Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy: A scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>46</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>3</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/47.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preparedness for Pediatric Oral Health Promotion Among Dental Hygiene Graduates]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/47.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Preventive dentistry prioritizes oral health promotion (OHP), the practice of actively teaching children and their caregivers about proper oral hygiene habits. The purpose of this study was to examine the oral health curriculum, clinical experiences, and OHP; the role of these experiences on current clinical practice and the perceptions of importance and confidence in providing pediatric care among dental hygienists recently licensed in the state of Utah.Methods Dental hygienists licensed in the state of Utah between 2022 and 2024 were invited to participate in a 20-item electronic survey about educational experiences and current clinical practices related to pediatric OHP. The survey included curriculum characteristics, the number and age of pediatric patients treated, confidence in treating age groups 1–6 and 7–12 upon graduation, the importance placed on 12 individual OHP topics, and whether previous education translated to clinical practice. Relationships among variables were assessed by statistical analyses.Results One-hundred dental hygienists accepted the invitation to participate for a 16.1% response rate. Most (86%) held a bachelor’s degree. Educational experiences were significantly correlated with the importance of providing pediatric OHP in clinical practice (p<0.01). Seven out of the twelve individual topics also showed significant correlations between education received and perceived importance (p<0.03). While most (55%) felt very confident treating 7–12-year-olds, only 34% were very confident treating patients aged 1-6 years. Confidence levels were associated with the number of patients treated during dental hygiene education, with patients aged 7–12 years statistically significant (p<0.01).Conclusions Adequate educational experiences on all OHP topics as well as pediatric clinical encounters need to be ensured within dental hygiene curricula so that all graduates perceive the importance of oral health promotion when providing pediatric care and have the confidence to care for patients aged 1–12 years.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[D. Allison Evensen, Megan Ciacci Patrella, Margaret Six]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T10:51:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/3/47</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preparedness for Pediatric Oral Health Promotion Among Dental Hygiene Graduates]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>58</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>3</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/59.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dental Hygiene Students&#x2019; Knowledge of Holistic Approaches to Oral Health Care]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/59.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose There has been an increased interest from patients and providers in holistic dentistry for oral health care, however, there is limited information available on the perception and level of integration of holistic dentistry in dental hygiene education. The purpose of this study was to assess dental hygiene students’ knowledge and confidence regarding holistic dentistry for oral health care.Methods An 18-item electronic survey was sent to 330 program directors in the United States for distribution to dental hygiene students graduating in the class of 2024. The survey included demographic, Likert scale, open-ended, and sliding scale questions assessing students’ knowledge, attitudes, educational exposure, and interest in holistic dentistry and homeopathic ingredients in dental products. The data was recorded in an online survey platform and analyzed with statistical software. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.Results Many respondents (42%, n=138) indicated no familiarity with holistic dentistry and more than half (60%, n=197) did not feel comfortable when discussing holistic dentistry with their patients. There was a relationship between the level of familiarity with holistic dentistry and confidence when this care option with patients (p<0.05). A low number of respondents were familiar with diagnostic tests used in holistic dentistry such as pH level, saliva, and microbiology; however, most were not familiar with coral calcium, nano-silver, lemongrass oil, green tea-based extract ingredients. Respondents indicated having learned about holistic dentistry in nutrition (42%, n=138) and pharmacology (41%, n=135), biomaterials (23%, n=75) or other courses (19%, n=62). Respondents learned about holistic dentistry from searching online (49%) or social media platforms (48%, n=157). However, 44% (n=157) thought it was important to be integrated into dental hygiene program curricula.Conclusion Although most respondents were not familiar with holistic dentistry and did not feel comfortable discussing it with their patients, they expressed an interest in learning more about it and valued the importance of integrating holistic oral health care into their dental hygiene curriculum.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Camill, Darlene Jones, Chin-Wei Wang, Olivia Anderson, Suncica Travan]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T10:51:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/3/59</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dental Hygiene Students&#x2019; Knowledge of Holistic Approaches to Oral Health Care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>59</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>67</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>3</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/68.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Opportunities and Challenges of Mentoring and Developing Student Reading Comprehension, Writing, and Research Synthesis at the Undergraduate Level]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/68.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dental hygiene (DH) education is grounded in evidence-based practice (EBP), requiring graduates to critically evaluate and apply scientific literature in clinical decision-making. However, widespread gaps in academic literacy, particularly in reading comprehension, writing, and research synthesis, pose significant challenges for undergraduate DH students transitioning from novice learners to competent practitioners. This short report examines the role of academic literacy as a foundational component of DH education and its alignment with the Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) standards. Drawing on evidence from nursing and allied health education, this paper highlights strategies to strengthen academic literacy through curriculum innovation, including writing-enriched curricula, scaffolding assignments, active learning, portfolio assessment, and the ethical integration of generative artificial intelligence. Additionally, the importance of faculty development, interprofessional collaboration, and librarian partnerships are emphasized to support both teaching efficacy and student success. By embedding academic literacy longitudinally across the curriculum, DH programs can better prepare undergraduates to engage in research, think critically, and deliver high-quality, person- centered care. Advancing academic literacy supports not only accreditation standards but also creates a foundation for the development of future leaders, educators, and researchers in the dental hygiene profession.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michelle C. Arnett, Denise C. McKinney, Iwonka T. Eagle, Leciel Bono, Danielle Rulli]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T10:51:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/3/68</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Opportunities and Challenges of Mentoring and Developing Student Reading Comprehension, Writing, and Research Synthesis at the Undergraduate Level]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short Report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>68</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>74</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>3</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/75.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unicystic Ameloblastoma: A case report]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/3/75.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[Purpose Radiolucent neoplasms can be identified on dental radiographs in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Examples of these lesions include dentigerous cyst, radicular cyst, odontogenic keratocyst, and ameloblastoma. Many of these lesions require a histologic examination to render the definitive diagnosis. In terms of the ameloblastoma, there are four distinct types of this tumor. These include the conventional ameloblastoma, unicystic ameloblastoma (UA), extraosseous/peripheral ameloblastoma, and metastasizing ameloblastoma. The purpose of this report is to present a case report of a unicystic ameloblastoma found in a 30-year-old female who presented to a general dental practice with a chief complaint of pain and swelling in the mandibular left third molar region. Further evaluation and eventual surgical excision were delayed due to misdiagnosis and delay in performing the biopsy. The definitive diagnosis for this lesion was a benign unicystic ameloblastoma (UA). Due to the size of the defect, the patient required a partial mandibulectomy, reconstructive surgery and placement of two dental implants. While the long-term prognosis for this patient is good, regular surveillance is needed as UA neoplasms have a high recurrence rate. This case study emphasizes the need for oral health care professionals to be vigilant in identifying signs and symptoms of oral disease to support early and accurate diagnosis.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harley Christensen, Mattie Hadley, Taryn Chapman, Katelyn Hickok, JoAnn R. Gurenlian]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T10:51:23-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/3/75</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unicystic Ameloblastoma: A case report]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short Report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>75</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>81</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>3</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/4.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Minutes of our Time. A Lifetime for our Patients!]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/4.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Catherine K. Draper, JoAnn R. Gurenlian]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-29T04:49:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/2/4</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Minutes of our Time. A Lifetime for our Patients!]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>5</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/6.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Embracing the Powers of Prevention]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/6.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer S. Brown]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-29T04:49:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/2/6</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Embracing the Powers of Prevention]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Guest Commentary</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>8</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/9.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Changes in Salivary Flow and Oral pH Following Use of Different Mouthrinse Formulations in Addition to Brushing Versus Brushing Only]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/9.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Mouthrinses contain inactive ingredients (e.g., solvents, such as alcohol) and active ingredients (e.g., antimicrobials, such as essential oils [EOs]) that work in combination to control gingival inflammation and regulate the oral microbiome. The purpose of this one-day, examiner-blind, randomized, parallel-group-controlled clinical trial was to understand the effect of different EO-containing mouthrinses, with and without alcohol, on salivary flow and pH.Methods Subjects aged ≥18 years were recruited to participate in a one-day trial conducted at an independent research center. Salivary flow and pH were measured following a regimen of brushing and rinsing with an EO-containing mouthrinse versus brushing and rinsing with a water rinse control (BW). Eligible participants were assigned 1:1:1:1 to the BW group or one of three EO-containing mouthrinse groups. Change in salivary flow and pH after a single use of an EO-containing mouthrinse compared to the BW group was assessed at 0 (salivary flow only), then at 2.5, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes.Results A total of 159 subjects completed the clinical trial. At 30 minutes following the intervention, the mean salivary flow was similar across all groups. The mean salivary pH increased in all groups through 15 minutes before returning to near-baseline levels by 30 minutes (all of which were within the normal oral pH range of 6.2–7.6). No adverse events were reported.Conclusion The inclusion of alcohol in the tested mouthrinse formulations did not affect salivary flow or pH compared with the alcohol-free mouthrinses, indicating that a single use of either an alcohol-containing or alcohol-free EO-containing mouthrinse does not contribute to oral dryness. Future trials investigating the long-term use of mouthrinses and their effect on salivary flow and pH will help to build on the current evidence base and inform clinical decision-making.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kimberly Milleman, Mary Lynn Bosma, Atsushi Saito, Patricia Gorecki, Yang Ding, Urmila Lanka, Alicia DelSasso, Kaylie Wills, Jeffery Milleman]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-29T04:49:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/2/9</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Changes in Salivary Flow and Oral pH Following Use of Different Mouthrinse Formulations in Addition to Brushing Versus Brushing Only]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>19</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/20.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Influence of Psychological Resilience and Emotional Labor on Employee Well-Being Among Dental Hygienists]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/20.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Purpose Health care workers have been shown to experience a decline in mental health and psychological well-being due to work-related factors. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between demographic and work variables, psychological resilience, emotional labor, and employee well-being among clinical dental hygienists.Methods A cross-sectional survey research design was used with a non-probability sample of clinical dental hygienists (n=411) using validated instruments including: the Emotional Labour Scale, Resilience Evaluation Scale and Employee Well-Being Scale. Participants were recruited on dental hygiene social media sites. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the results.Results The completion rate was 78% (n=322). The regression model for life well-being (LWB) was statistically significant (adjusted R2=.287, p<.001). The predictor that increased LWB was self-confidence (β=.403) while predictors of decreased LWB included surface acting (β=−.246), and hours worked (β=−.179, p<.001). The regression model for workplace well-being (WWB) was statistically significant (adjusted R2=.262, p<.001). Positive predictors of increased WWB included self-confidence (β=.353, p<.001), deep acting (β=.130, p=.007), age (β=.105, p<.034) while surface acting (β=−.252, p<.001) predicted lower WWB. The regression model for psychological well-being (PWB) was statistically significant (adjusted R2=.398, p<.001). Predictors that increased PWB included self-confidence (β=.352, p<.001), self-efficacy (β=.217, p< .001), deep acting (β=.162, p<.001), and frequency (β=.098, p<.035), while surface acting (β=−.193, p<.001) predicted lower PWB.Conclusion Dental hygienists displayed high levels of psychological resilience. However, hours worked and the factors impacting emotional labor, such as deep acting and surface acting, negatively impacted employee well-being. More research is needed to investigate strategies for managing emotional labor among dental hygienists.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amanda Walbrecher, Linda D. Boyd, Jared Vineyard, Denice McClure]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-29T04:49:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/2/20</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Influence of Psychological Resilience and Emotional Labor on Employee Well-Being Among Dental Hygienists]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>32</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/33.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Dental Hygiene Students Regarding Artificial Intelligence]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/33.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[Purpose Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in health professions education, yet little is known about dental hygiene students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to AI. The purpose of this descriptive, cross-sectional program-based evaluation was to gather student input on knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to AI to guide curriculum integration planning.Methods A 38-item questionnaire was administered to 120 dental hygiene students across five different cohorts at a single institution. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze responses, with significance set at p<0.05.Results All students (N=120) completed the survey. mean knowledge score was 64.5% ± 1.39 with the highest mean observed among the most senior students (69% ± 1.3). Knowledge was strongest in machine learning approaches and in understanding AI’s nature and limitations, and weakest in clinical application. Nearly 90% agreed that ethical concerns about AI deserve greater attention, while 19% felt comfortable with AI independently evaluating a patient’s oral health. In practice, most reported using AI tools for academic learning such as summarizing course material (71%), whereas fewer used AI for creative applications such as image generation (23%). One-way ANOVA comparisons found no significant difference between cohorts in the knowledge domain (p> 0.05). Cohorts differed significantly in their attitudes about using AI responsibly in the clinical setting as well as their use of AI to study for tests and prepare study aids (p<0.05).Conclusion Students exhibited a basic understanding of AI but lacked depth in areas related to regulation and data quality. Attitudes were positive toward responsibility and ethics yet concerns about AI’s impact on clinical judgment and patient care were observed. In practice, AI was used primarily for academic learning, less for creative tasks. Findings underscored the need for curricular strategies that ensure all students receive consistent preparation in ethical, practical, and responsible AI use.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michelle Hurlbutt, April M. Turner, Jila Torabi, Fran Soderling, Debi Gerger]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-29T04:49:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/2/33</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Dental Hygiene Students Regarding Artificial Intelligence]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Critical Issues in Dental Hygiene</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>44</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/45.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improving Interprofessional Knowledge And Cooperation Through an Interprofessional Activity Between Physician Assistant and Dental Hygiene Students]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/45.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[Purpose Oral health education in primary care training is becoming increasingly important, as health professionals become aware of the connection between oral health and systemic health. Dental hygienists are uniquely positioned to support oral health education due to their clinical expertise and patient-centered focus on oral health promotion, disease prevention, and education. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of an interprofessional education (IPE) activity with dental hygiene (DH) and physician assistant (PA) students focusing on oral health education.Methods This half-day IPE activity was first implemented with DH and PA students in 2019, incorporating lecture and case-based learning, and repeated with four subsequent cohorts. Students’ self-reported knowledge and confidence were assessed via pre and post-activity Likert-type scale survey questions with all five cohorts of students following the completion of the activity. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was calculated to compare DH and PA students’ pre- and post-question scores.Results There were statistically significant increases in pre- and post-activity self-reported knowledge for both the DH and PA groups with a mean gain of 0.55 for DH students and 1.09 for PA students. The largest gain was in knowledge of the other’s education and training.Conclusion This IPE activity demonstrated that DH and PA students working together in a case-based learning activity improves confidence in communicating with each other, assessing the medical and dental history, examining the oral cavity for signs of disease, and recognizing normal and abnormal oral pathology.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Rachel Fink, J. Dustin Tracy, Ashley K. Christman, Gianluca De Leo]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-29T04:49:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/2/45</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improving Interprofessional Knowledge And Cooperation Through an Interprofessional Activity Between Physician Assistant and Dental Hygiene Students]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Critical Issues in Dental Hygiene</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>56</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/57.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a Clinical Board Readiness Program in Dental Hygiene Education]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/57.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[Purpose A majority of the dental hygiene clinical board examinations are now administered as a simulated patient in combination with an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and understanding how to prepare students for successful outcomes is critical. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical board readiness program for two cohorts of dental hygiene students who had different clinical board preparation methodologies.Methods This retrospective comparative cohort study utilized a convenience sample of dental hygiene student records from the class of 2024 (cohort 1) and the class of 2025 (cohort 2) from a single institution. Cohorts 1 and 2 completed identical mock board examinations during the fourth and fifth semesters. Students in cohort 2 were required to participate in a “clinical board readiness program” before the start of the fourth semester and prior to the mock board examinations while cohort 1 only experienced the mock board examinations. Scores on the American Board of Dental Examiners (ADEX) dental hygiene simulated-patient treatment clinical examination (SPTCE) were compared for the two cohorts. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data.Results Forty-six dental hygiene student records were reviewed and met the inclusion criteria (n=46); cohort 1 (n=21) and cohort 2 (n=25). There were no significant differences in the mean calculus detection and periodontal probing depth scores on the mock board examinations. However, there were significant differences in the mean calculus removal scores between the two cohorts and by semester (p<0.001). However, of the 46 students who passed the SPTCE, nearly all (96%, n=44) passed the exam on the first attempt and no significant differences were identified between the two cohorts (p=1.000).Conclusion These findings suggest that while targeted preparation programs can strengthen specific skills, their overall influence on clinical board examination success may be limited when students already meet the minimum threshold for passing.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin A. Gatlin]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-29T04:49:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/2/57</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a Clinical Board Readiness Program in Dental Hygiene Education]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Critical Issues in Dental Hygiene</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>64</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/65.short?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors Influencing Dental Hygienists&#x2019; Membership in Professional Associations]]></title>
<link>http://jdh.adha.org/content/100/2/65.short?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[media-1v1Membership with professional organizations, including the American Dental Hygienists’ Association (ADHA), plays an important role in supporting dental hygienists through continuing education, networking, advocacy, and professional identity development. Despite these established benefits, membership rates in professional associations remain low. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the trends influencing membership decisions among licensed dental hygienists to inform the design of a larger, more representative national investigation. A cross-sectional electronic survey was pilot tested for content validity and distributed to dental hygienists in four states using convenience sampling. Participants provided demographic information, current membership status in any professional organizations (including the ADHA), and perceptions of benefits and barriers to engagement. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA were used to analyze initial trends. Among the respondents (n=250), 25% reported current ADHA membership; most identified advocacy (82%), access to continuing education (76%), and networking (61%) as meaningful benefits of belonging to a professional organization. In contrast, non-members cited high costs of membership (52%), lack of employer reimbursement (38%), and time constraints (12%) as primary barriers. Non-members were significantly younger (p<0.001) and graduated more recently (p<0.001) than members. Individuals with higher educational attainment were more likely to maintain membership in a professional organization (p<0.001). Open-ended responses revealed varied perceptions of organizational relevance, accessibility, and visibility. These preliminary findings highlight key factors that may shape engagement with professional organizations, including the ADHA. The results underscore the need for expanded sampling, strengthened early-career exposure, and further qualitative exploration. Findings from this pilot will guide the development of a larger national study aimed at understanding and improving professional organization membership among dental hygienists.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abrielle Lamphere, Iwonka Eagle]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-29T04:49:51-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>hwp:resource-id:jdenthyg;100/2/65</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Dental Hygienists&#x27; Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors Influencing Dental Hygienists&#x2019; Membership in Professional Associations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>YEAR-MO-DAY</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Short Report</prism:section>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>65</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>70</prism:endingPage>
<prism:issueIdentifier>2</prism:issueIdentifier>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>