Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a clinical study

Scand J Dent Res. 1990 Aug;98(4):345-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1990.tb00983.x.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the retention rate of a glass ionomer cement formulated for fissure sealing with two resin-based sealants, 208 occlusal fissures of permanent molars and premolars were sealed with either Fuji III, Delton or Concise WS by four dentists. Clinical assessments and a replica scoring technique were used to register the performance of the sealants at baseline, after 6-12 months, and then yearly up to 5 yr. As judged clinically, 61% of the glass ionomer sealants were lost within 6-12 months and 84% after 30-36 months. Although total loss was recorded clinically for the majority of the glass ionomer sealants, some retained sealant was observed in the tooth replicas in 93% of them. The clinical evaluation of the resin-based sealants showed an average complete retention rate of 90% after 4.5-5 yr. The corresponding figure with the replica technique was 58%. Caries was recorded in 5% of the resin-based and in none of the glass ionomer sealed surfaces.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Acrylates*
  • Adolescent
  • Bicuspid
  • Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Composite Resins*
  • Dental Bonding*
  • Dental Caries / pathology
  • Dental Cements*
  • Dental Enamel
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Glass Ionomer Cements*
  • Humans
  • Methacrylates*
  • Molar
  • Pit and Fissure Sealants*
  • Surface Properties

Substances

  • Acrylates
  • Composite Resins
  • Dental Cements
  • Glass Ionomer Cements
  • Methacrylates
  • Pit and Fissure Sealants
  • Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate