A randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Dec;72(6):1050-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1050.

Abstract

The Evaluating Methods for Motivational Enhancement Education trial evaluated methods for learning motivational interviewing (MI). Licensed substance abuse professionals (N = 140) were randomized to 5 training conditions: (a) clinical workshop only; (b) workshop plus practice feedback; (c) workshop plus individual coaching sessions; (d) workshop, feedback, and coaching; or (e) a waiting list control group of self-guided training. Audiotaped practice samples were analyzed at baseline, posttraining, and 4, 8, and 12 months later. Relative to controls, the 4 trained groups showed larger gains in proficiency. Coaching and/or feedback also increased posttraining proficiency. After delayed training, the waiting list group showed modest gains in proficiency. Posttraining proficiency was generally well maintained throughout follow-up. Clinician self-reports of MI skillfulness were unrelated to proficiency levels in observed practice.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Feedback
  • Female
  • Health Personnel / education*
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic*
  • Learning*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Motivation*
  • Substance-Related Disorders / diagnosis
  • Substance-Related Disorders / therapy
  • Surveys and Questionnaires