Elsevier

Nurse Education Today

Volume 20, Issue 7, October 2000, Pages 555-562
Nurse Education Today

Article
Student and mentor perceptions of mentoring effectiveness

https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2000.0464Get rights and content

Abstract

The following is an account of a small pilot study conducted over a 3-month period which ascertained the views of staff nurses and students about the mentoring process. In particular, whether the possession of a teaching qualification influences the effectiveness of mentors. The research was conducted in a district general hospital in North Wales.

The findings demonstrate that staff nurses with a teaching and assessing qualification consistently rate themselves as more effective and supportive than those without. Other findings show that students consistently rate their mentors positively irrespective of whether they held a teaching and assessing qualification and that students rate their mentors more positively than the mentors themselves. Although these findings are not generalizable in the accepted sense they may be applicable to other practice settings. The findings and discussion indicate several implications for future practice including the need for:

• More consistency in practice regarding the nature and purpose of mentorship

• Clear criteria and selection processes for potential mentors, including more extensive use of the Measuring Mentor Potential (MMP) scale as a predictive tool

• A review of current mentor preparation programmes to align them with the needs of diploma and degree students and to ensure comparability of standards throughout the UK

• More discussion regarding the nature and purpose of mentorship including further examination of a range of mentorship models.

References (35)

  • A. Brennan

    Preceptorship: is it a workable concept?

    Nursing Standard

    (1993)
  • P. Burnard

    Mentors or preceptors: narrowing the theory practice gap

    Nurse Education Today

    (1991)
  • H.A. Cahill

    The qualitative analysis of student nurses experiences of mentorship

    Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (1996)
  • B.G. Chickerella et al.

    Professional nurturance: Preceptorship for undergraduate nursing students

    American Journal of Nursing

    (1981)
  • L.A. Darling

    What do nurses want in a mentor?

    The Journal of Nursing Administration

    (1984)
  • Circular 1987/28 MAT, Approval process for courses in nursing, midwifery and health visiting.

    (1987)
  • Information Required, Criteria and Guidelines.

    (1988)
  • Cited by (80)

    • To what extent does the use of a coaching-based style of student supervision in clinical practice impact experiences of placements for staff and students: A state-of-the-art literature review

      2021, Nurse Education Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      Rowbotham and Owen (2015) acknowledge that supervisors are essential to the functioning of this relationship, and should support students by offering suggestions for improvement, identify strengths and limitation, communicate expectations, give positive reinforcement, and correct, without belittling. Nursing education has, however, placed emphasis on the role of students in this relationship, placing a focus on student independence and promoting students being active participants in the mentoring relationship (Andrews and Chilton, 2000). Research by Lobo et al. (2014) (Table 4) reports that prior to a trial of the CLiP style of student supervision, nurses had previously described students as being a ‘burden’ and express apprehension toward working with them.

    • Psychometric properties of the mentor behaviour scale in a sample of Malaysian medical students

      2018, Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Mentoring is a two-way dynamic, a symbiotic and complex relationship between mentor and mentee resulting in career advancement and satisfaction.1,2

    • Supporting nurse mentor development: An exploration of developmental constellations in nursing mentorship practice

      2018, Nurse Education in Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Its grading system allowed assessment of strength of attribute by correlating this with the strength of relationship. Darling's MMP has been widely adopted into the rhetoric of some UK mentorship courses and the mentorship texts supporting them (Andrews and Chilton, 2000; Gopee, 2015). Darling's MMP offers a list of characteristics thought useful in mentorship and similar to those reported elsewhere in the UK literature (Best, 2005; Hall et al., 2008), but more significantly it is explicitly nursing focused and rates the strength of attributes, allowing a suggestion of the presence, gaps and levels of attribute offered within a constellation.

    • The Value of Preparing PhD Students as Research Mentors: Application of Kram's Temporal Mentoring Model

      2016, Journal of Professional Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite an extensive search, very little published literature was located that described student-to-student mentoring relationships in higher education. The literature that is available has focused on benefits of peer mentoring, with papers championing the idea of peer mentors, or students mentoring students (Andrews & Chilton, 2000; Giordana & Wedin, 2010), typically in the context of clinical settings. One study from a discipline outside of nursing was reviewed that examined motivations and benefits to graduate/postdoctoral student mentoring undergraduate students in a molecular life science program (Dolan & Johnson, 2009).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text