Review article
Eating Competence: Definition and Evidence for the Satter Eating Competence Model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2007.01.006Get rights and content

Abstract

The evidence- and practice-based Satter Eating Competence Model (ecSatter) outlines an inclusive definition of the interrelated spectrum of eating attitudes and behaviors. The model is predicated on the utility and effectiveness of biopsychosocial processes: hunger and the drive to survive, appetite and the need for subjective reward and the biological propensity to maintain preferred and stable body weight. According to ecSatter, competent eaters have 1) positive attitudes about eating and about food, 2) food acceptance skills that support eating an ever-increasing variety of the available food, 3) internal regulation skills that allow intuitively consuming enough food to give energy and stamina and to support stable body weight, and 4) skills and resources for managing the food context and orchestrating family meals. Identifying these four constructs allows nutrition professionals to target interventions as well as trust and support the individual’s own capabilities and tendency to learn and grow.

Section snippets

Eating Competence

An obvious truth, but one that is all too often forgotten, is that the purpose of eating is to sustain life. On a fundamental level, eating competence has to do with the behaviors and attitudes that ensure getting fed. Maintaining access to a variety of nutritious food in amounts adequate to support the needs and stresses of life is a tremendously complex and unrelenting task. It is self-evident that every society that has survived has done enormous amounts of trial and error to arrive at

Eating Attitudes from the ecSatter Perspective

From the perspective of ecSatter, to support nutritional health, it is critical to establish and maintain positive, confident, relaxed, comfortable, and flexible attitudes about eating. Such positive attitudes allow being responsively attuned to outer and inner experiences relative to eating. Outer experiences include food availability, social interactions with eating companions (and those who control the food supply), and supports or pressures on eating attitudes and behaviors inherent in

Food Acceptance from the ecSatter Perspective

From the perspective of ecSatter, enjoyment and pleasure are primary motivators for food selection, and nutritional excellence is supported by enjoyment and learned food preference based on subjective reward from eating. Food acceptance attitudes and behaviors include taking a positive interest in food, being comfortable in the presence of unfamiliar food, and being inclined to experiment with novel food and learn to like it. Appetite—the interest in eating based on its aesthetic and gustatory

Regulation of Food Intake from the ecSatter Perspective

The Satter Eating Competence Model of regulating food intake, energy balance, and body weight is experiential in nature. It emphasizes internally regulated eating, which attends to physiological homeostatic mechanisms that support biologically preferred body weight and maintains energy balance through the sensations of hunger and fullness. Appetitive cues—the pursuit of aesthetics and pleasure—guide regulation through preference for higher- or lower-calorie food depending on energy deficit. In

Eating Context from the ecSatter Perspective

ecSatter stresses providing rather than depriving, food seeking rather than food avoidance. Relative to maintaining nutritional quality of the diet, the primary nutrition goal is structure and the primary intervention is meal planning. Social importance of mealtimes aside, meals provide reliable access to food, offer a wider variety of food than that commonly chosen for snacks or grazing, and give a framework for repeated, neutral exposure to unfamiliar food. Structure and meal planning build

ecSatter Supports Nutrition Policy

Despite the fact that ecSatter is fundamentally different from the conventional approach, it is consistent with nutrition policy as defined by the Dietary Guidelines.12 In contrast to MyPyramid,13 which operationalizes the Dietary Guidelines with prescriptions of what and how much to eat, ecSatter operationalizes the Dietary Guidelines by emphasizing family meals and food-management strategy that supports family meals, particularly including choosing intrinsically rewarding food.

Implications

ecSatter frames a perspective on eating attitudes and behaviors that is broader and more inclusive than, as well as philosophically opposite from, the conventional approach. The model separates the components of food- and nutrition-related attitudes, cognitions, and behaviors and defines a measurable vocabulary. Those components of eating competence are: (1) eating attitudes, (2) food acceptance skills, (3) skills with respect to regulation of food intake and body weight, and (4) capability

References (95)

  • Y. Martins et al.

    Human food choices: an examination of the factors underlying acceptance/rejection of novel and familiar animal and nonanimal foods

    Appetite

    (2005)
  • P. Pliner

    The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances

    Appetite

    (1982)
  • L. Hallberg et al.

    Iron absorption from Southeast Asian diets

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1977)
  • R.J. Tuschl et al.

    Differences in food-choice frequencies between restrained and unrestrained eaters

    Appetite

    (1990)
  • D.L. Kern et al.

    The postingestive consequences of fat condition preferences for flavors associated with high dietary fat

    Physiol Behav

    (1993)
  • V.S. Tarasuk et al.

    Women’s dietary intakes in the context of household food insecurity

    J Nutr

    (1999)
  • A. Kendall et al.

    Validation of the Radimer/Cornell Measures of Hunger and Food Insecurity

    J Nutr

    (1995)
  • R.V. Luepker et al.

    Cardiovascular risk factor change 1973-74 vs 1980-82: the Minnesota Heart Survey

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1988)
  • M.L. McCullough et al.

    Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: moving toward improved dietary guidance

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2002)
  • R.D. Mattes et al.

    Daily caloric intake of normal-weight adults: Response to changes in dietary energy density of a luncheon meal

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1988)
  • C.M. Hadigan et al.

    Patterns of food selection during meals in women with bulimia

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1989)
  • E.A. Bell et al.

    Energy density of foods affects energy intake in normal-weight women

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1998)
  • B.J. Rolls et al.

    Larger portion sizes lead to a sustained increase in energy intake over 2 days

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (2006)
  • J. Mayer et al.

    Relation between caloric intake, body weight and physical work

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1956)
  • L. Bacon et al.

    Size acceptance and intuitive eating improve health for obese, female chronic dieters

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (2005)
  • M.S. Townsend et al.

    Food insecurity is positively related to overweight in women

    J Nutr

    (2001)
  • T.A. Wadden et al.

    Relationship of dieting history to resting metabolic rate, body composition, eating behavior, and subsequent weight loss

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1992)
  • T. van Strien et al.

    Counterregulation in female obese emotional eaters: Schachter, Goldman, and Gordon’s (1968) test of psychosomatic theory revisited

    Eat Behav

    (2003)
  • M.R. Lowe et al.

    Restrictive dieting vs. “undieting” effects on eating regulation in obese clinic attenders

    Addict Behav

    (2001)
  • D.J. Shide et al.

    Information about the fat content of preloads influences energy intake in healthy women

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (1995)
  • J.M. Kerver et al.

    Meal and Snack Patterns Are Associated with Dietary Intake of Energy and Nutrients in US Adults

    J Am Diet Assoc

    (2006)
  • H.R. Farshchi et al.

    Beneficial metabolic effects of regular meal frequency on dietary thermogenesis, insulin sensitivity, and fasting lipid profiles in healthy obese women

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2005)
  • D. Neumark-Sztainer et al.

    Are family meal patterns associated with disordered eating behaviors among adolescents?

    J Adolesc Health

    (2004)
  • C. Zizza et al.

    Significant increase in young adults’ snacking between 1977-1978 and 1994-1996 represents a cause for concern!

    Prev Med

    (2001)
  • T.M. Videon et al.

    Influences on adolescent eating patterns: the importance of family meals

    J Adolesc Health

    (2003)
  • J.O. Fisher et al.

    Eating in the absence of hunger and overweight in girls from 5 to 7 y of age

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2002)
  • L.L. Birch et al.

    Children’s eating: the development of food-acceptance patterns

    Young Child

    (1995)
  • E.M. Satter

    Optimize feeding: birth through preschool

  • E.M. Satter

    Optimize feeding: your school-age child

  • E.M. Satter

    Optimize feeding: your adolescent

  • E.M. Satter

    The secret in a nutshell

  • United States Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines...
  • United States Department of Agriculture. MyPyramid.gov. Available at: http://www.mypyramid.gov/mypyramid/index.aspx....
  • N. Wellman

    The good and the bad: how Americans are making food choices

    Nutrition News

    (1990)
  • Survey of American Dietary Habits

    (1997)
  • D. Hales

    What America really eats

    (2005)
  • Nutrition Trends 2002: Final Report of Findings

    (2002)
  • Cited by (149)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text