Abstract
In this study, it is aimed to determine the daily life experiences of patients on the basis their own way of statement. Sixteen patients with scleroderma were enrolled to this qualitative study. Data were collected using both a demographic data form and a semi-structured interview form. Study was made on individual patient interview by face-to-face manner. Data were evaluated using Colaizzi’s phenomenological data analysis method. Data analysis revealed four categories and nine topics. These categories were (1) physical impact of disease, (2) emotional impact of disease, (3) social impact of disease and (4) patient behaviours for the cope with the disease. As emotional impact, patients imply that they have experienced disappointment, hope to get well and have fears about the future. In the physical impact category, tight skin, limitations of hand skills, swelling of the hands and feet, fatigue, swallowing difficulties and deformation of their bodies were the prominent features. In patients with recognizable disease, difficulty to join to social activities increases and eventually leads to isolation. There was also some evidence that patients who have been supported by their family and close relatives seem to be more optimistic about their disease. Most patients are not willing to communicate with other patients, particularly in an advanced stage. Scleroderma patients imply that they experience several difficulties regarding emotional, physical and social aspects. Individual abilities to cope with the disease were much more improved among patients who have a sustained social support. For advanced patients with apparent deformations, an effective social support system should be introduced.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Denton CP, Black CM, Abraham DJ (2006) Mechanisms and consequences of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2(3):134–144
Denton CP, Black CM (2004) Scleroderma—clinical and pathological advances. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 18(3):271–290
Varga J (2008) Systemic sclerosis: an update. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 66(3):198–202
Hyphantis TN, Tsifetaki N, Siafaka V, Voulgari PV, Pappa C, Bai M, Palieraki K, Venetsanopoulou A, Mavreas V, Drosos AA (2007) The impact of psychological functioning upon systemic sclerosis patients’ quality of life. Semin Arthritis Rheum 37(2):81–92
Hudson M, Steele R, Lu Y, Thombs BD, Canadian Scleroderma Research Group, Baron M (2009) Work disability in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 36(11):2481–2486
Suarez-Almazor ME, Kallen MA, Roundtree AK, Mayes M (2007) Disease and symptom burden in systemic sclerosis: a patient perspective. J Rheumatol 34(8):1718–1726
Mendelson C, Poole JL (2007) Become your own advocate: advice from women living with scleroderma. Disabil Rehabil 29(19):1492–1501
Hudson M, Thombs BD, Steele R, Panopalis P, Newton E, Baron M, Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (2009) Health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 61(8):1112–1120
Joachim G, Acorn S (2003) Life with a rare chronic disease: the scleroderma experience. J Adv Nurs 42(6):598–606
Bas T, Akturan U (2008) Nitel araştırma yöntemleri, NVivo 7.0 ile nitel veri analizi, vol 1. Seçkin, Sözkesen Matbaacılık, Ankara
Emiroğlu O (2002) Niteliksel araştırma tasarımları. In: Erefe I (ed) Hemşirelikte araştırma ilke süreç ve yöntemleri, 1st edn. Odak Ofset, İstanbul, pp 103–124
Colaizzi PF (1978) Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In: Valle R, King M (eds) Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 48–71
Jones E, Farina A, Hastorf A et al (1984) Social stigma: the psychology of marked relationships. Freeman, New York
Crandell CS, Moriarity D (1995) Physical illness stigma and social rejection. Br J Psychol 34:67–83
Harris DL, Carr AT (2001) Prevalence of concern about physical appearance in the general population. Br J Plast Surg 54(3):223–226
Poole JL, Steen V (1991) The use of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) to measure physical disability in systemic sclerosis. Arthr Care Res 4:27–31
Poole JL (1994) A descriptive study of grasp pattern variations seen in the SSC hand. Am J Occup Ther 4:46–54
Del Rosso A, Boldrini M, D’Agostino D, Placidi GP, Scarpato A et al (2004) Health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis as measured by the short-form 36: relationship with clinical and biologic markers. Arthr Rheum 51(3):475–481
Malcarne VL, Greenburgs HL (1996) Psychological adjustment to systemic sclerosis. Arthr Care Res 9:51–59
Poole JL, Brewer C, Good C, Rossie K, Steen V, Conte C (2005) Factors related to oral hygiene in individuals with SSC. Int J Dent Hyg 3:1–5
Maycock J (1988) The image of the rheumatic disease. In: Salter M (ed) Altered body image: the nurse’s role. Wiley, New York, pp 117–136
Dropkin MJ (1999) Body image and quality of life after head and neck cancer surgery. Cancer Pract 7(6):309–313
Newell RJ (1999) Altered body image: a fear-avoidance model of psycho-social difficulties following disfigurement. J Adv Nurs 30(5):1230–1238
Toombs SK (1995) Sufficient unto the day. In: Toombs SK, Barnard D, Carson RA (eds) Chronic illness: from experience to policy. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, pp 1–23
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank the 16 women who participated in our study and shared their experiences with us.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cinar, F.I., Unver, V., Yilmaz, S. et al. Living with scleroderma: patients’ perspectives, a phenomenological study. Rheumatol Int 32, 3573–3579 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2230-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2230-2