PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Hodges, Kathleen O.
AU  - Rogo, Ellen J.
AU  - Cahoon, Allison C.
AU  - Neill, Karen
TI  - Collaborative Dental Hygiene Practice in New Mexico and Minnesota
DP  - 2016 Jun 01
TA  - American Dental Hygienists Association
PG  - 148--161
VI  - 90
IP  - 3
4099  - http://jdh.adha.org/content/90/3/148.short
4100  - http://jdh.adha.org/content/90/3/148.full
SO  - J Dent Hyg2016 Jun 01; 90
AB  - Purpose: This descriptive, comparative study was conducted to examine characteristics, services, models and opinions among collaborative dental hygiene practitioners in New Mexico and Minnesota.Methods: A self-designed online questionnaire, distributed via SurveyMonkey®, was utilized to collect data from 73 subjects who met the inclusion criteria. A multi-phase administration process was followed. Content validity and reliability was established. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis of 6 research questions. The Mann-Whitney U, Pearson Chi-Square and Fisher's Exact tests were employed to analyze 4 null hypotheses (p=0.05).Results: Most participants (n=36) were experienced clinicians who chose to work in an alternative setting after 28 years or more in the field and reported increased access to care as the reason for practicing collaboratively. A variety of services were offered and private insurance and Medicaid were accepted, although many practitioners did not receive direct reimbursement. The majority of New Mexico participants worked in private dental hygiene practices, earned advanced degrees and serviced Health Provider Shortage Areas. The majority of Minnesota respondents worked in various facilities, earned associate's degrees and were uncertain if Health Provider Shortage Areas were served. There were no significant differences in the variables between practitioners in both states.Conclusion: New Mexico and Minnesota collaborative dental hygiene practitioners are similar in characteristics, services, and opinions although models of practice vary. Collaborative dental hygiene practice is a viable answer to increasing access to care and is an option for patients who might otherwise go without care, including the unserved, underserved, uninsured and underinsured.