RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Massachusetts Dental Public Health Program Directors Practice Behaviors and Perceptions Of Infection Control
JF American Dental Hygienists Association
JO J Dent Hyg
FD American Dental Hygienists Association
SP 248
OP 255
VO 86
IS 3
A1 Debra November–Rider
A1 Kimberly Krust Bray
A1 Kathy J. Eklund
A1 Karen B. Williams
A1 Tanya Villalpando Mitchell
YR 2012
UL http://jdh.adha.org/content/86/3/248.abstract
AB Purpose: The objective of this exploratory study was to determine the current infection control practices used in Massachusetts dental public health programs and assess the perceived compliance and challenges with infection control standards as outlined in the 2003 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) infection control guidelines. Methods: A convenience sample of program directors of dental public health programs in Massachusetts (n=82) were invited to participate. The directors were identified through the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, local dental/dental hygiene schools and key stakeholders in dental public health. The electronic questionnaire–based survey consisted of 26 open/closed–ended and Likert scale questions. Statistical analysis included frequency distribution and factor analysis. Results: The overall response rate was 43%. The majority of responders to the survey were from public health settings using fixed/mobile dental equipment (82.9%), compared to settings using portable equipment (17.1%). Perceived lapses in the guidelines were attributed to lack of finances (r=0.938), lack of personnel (r=0.874) and lack of space (r=0.763). The only significant correlation between the program directors perceived adherence to the CDC guidelines was having access to necessary supplies and equipment (r=0.914). Program directors indicated that the CDC guidelines are hard to apply (r=0.895) and guidelines specific to settings using portable equipment would be helpful (r=0.925). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the sample size and response rate, directors from public health settings using both fixed/mobile and portable equipment reported being able to apply the current 2003 CDC infection control guidelines with few compliance challenges. However, respondents indicated that the guidelines were hard to apply and that infection control guidelines for settings using portable equipment would be useful.