Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archived Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisements
    • Subscribing
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • JDH Reviewers
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Permissions
    • Accessibility Statement

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Dental Hygiene

Visit the American Dental Hygienists' Association's main website

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Journal of Dental Hygiene

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archived Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Advertisements
    • Subscribing
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • JDH Reviewers
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Permissions
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Visit jdenthyg on Facebook
  • Follow jdenthyg on Twitter
  • Follow jdenthyg on Instagram
  • Follow jdenthyg on Linkedin
  • RSS feeds
Research ArticleShort Report
Open Access

Stannous Fluoride Toothpaste: Improving gingival health without a new habit adoption

Beth A. Jordan and Adam E. Saltz
American Dental Hygienists' Association August 2026, 100 (4) 68-74;
Beth A. Jordan
The Procter & Gamble Company, Mason, OH, USA
RDH, MS, FADHA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jordan.ba.1{at}pg.com
Adam E. Saltz
Private practice clinician, South Portland, ME, USA
DMD, MS, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose Dental hygienists are uniquely positioned to improve oral and overall health outcomes with evidence-based treatment plans. One recommendation that has yet to see its full potential is the use of stannous fluoride (SnF2) toothpaste. Stannous fluoride is more than just an anticaries agent. Its formulation within a toothpaste offers superior performance in reducing plaque, gingivitis, sensitivity, halitosis, and tooth erosion, while maintaining the sulcular barrier integrity. However, most patients are unaware of these easily available benefits for oral health. This short report highlights the universal efficacy of SnF2 toothpaste, including significant reductions in gingival bleeding as compared with regular fluoride; reviews its proposed mechanisms, including antibacterial and antivirulence activity around teeth and implants as well as substructure remineralization; and explores its potential systemic health impact. The specific formulation of the toothpaste product also affects these factors, emphasizing the value of formulation-specific evidence to inform chairside recommendations. Including a well-formulated SnF2 toothpaste as part of daily oral hygiene leverages an existing behavior and reinforces proper habits for better oral health outcomes.

Keywords
  • stannous fluoride
  • oral hygiene
  • toothpaste
  • anti-gingivitis
  • periodontal disease
  • dental implants
  • prevention
  • dentinal hypersensitivity

INTRODUCTION

Gingivitis, inflammation of the gingiva due to an undisturbed accumulation of dental biofilm,1,2 is widespread globally among adults and can advance to periodontitis based on various local, patient, and environmental risk factors.2-5 The rate of severe periodontitis has increased globally and has been associated with increases in the aging population.6 When gingival inflammation is addressed early, through effective biofilm disruption, it not only improves oral health outcomes but may also reduce the potential for systemic complications.7 Therefore, preventing, diagnosing, and treating gingivitis through effective tools and patient education is foundational to long-term success for positive oral health outcomes.

According to the 2025 Standards for Clinical Dental Hygiene Practice,8 the dental hygienist utilizes evidence-based research and guidelines to provide safe and effective care that involves the patient as a co-therapist. Dental hygiene interventions are preventive, educational, and therapeutic with a focus on reducing, eliminating or preventing oral disease, underscoring the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of gingivitis. Within this preventive and therapeutic framework, effective biofilm control remains the first line of defense. Twice-daily mechanical plaque control through toothbrushing and interdental cleaning along with professional prophylaxis is foundational and can reverse and prevent early stages of periodontal disease. The success of these approaches relies heavily on patient knowledge, adherence, and dexterity;9,10 and consequently high disease prevalence persists. This challenge has prompted researchers and manufacturers to develop supplemental technologies to assist patients with plaque control, including home care products with chemotherapeutics to extend the benefits of mechanical oral hygiene.11 Among these products, stannous fluoride (SnF2) toothpaste has been evaluated extensively for its ability to provide both anticaries and antimicrobial benefits, supporting its role as a chemotherapeutic adjunct in oral health promotion and gingivitis management.12,13

In spite of what is known in the literature about the chemotherapeutic benefits of toothpaste products, in an international study of dental hygienists, 40% of the participants reported that they do not make specific toothpaste recommendations to their patients.14 This lack of recommendation may be due to the finding that over half (58%) of the participants believed that all fluoride toothpastes were essentially the same and equally effective.14 However, a large body of evidence demonstrates that toothpaste selection can meaningfully support significant reductions in gingival inflammation and bleeding sites,12,15-17 and although over-the-counter toothpastes are readily available, product recommendations should be considered as therapeutic measures and included in the dental hygiene care plan.

Among the available self-care therapies, SnF2-containing toothpastes stand out as a leading evidence-based option.12,15-21 Although sodium fluoride and sodium monofluorophosphate are established anticaries agents,13 SnF2 has been shown to not only deliver an anticaries benefit13 but also a variety of other health benefits, including control of plaque, gingivitis, halitosis, hypersensitivity, and dental erosion12,15-21 (Figure 1). Stannous fluoride’s main mechanism is that it exerts a bacteriostatic effect, inhibiting plaque growth,17,21 and the metabolic production of acids22 and toxic byproducts.23 In addition, SnF2 binds to bacterial toxins including lipopolysaccharides (LPS), thus preventing inflammatory signaling, while maintaining sulcular barrier integrity.24,25

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Oral health benefits of toothpastes containing fluoride formulations

Use of a well-formulated SnF2 toothpaste is not only backed by decades of clinical research evidence,12,17-21 but it is easy for patients to implement, as switching to a SnF2 toothpaste reinforces an existing habit. In addition, contemporary formulated SnF2 toothpastes are widely available. Collectively, these findings support the concerted effort to incorporate SnF2 into evidence-based self-care recommendations and patient education. The purpose of this short report is to summarize the benefits of SnF2 for oral and systemic health.

Gingival Bleeding Benefits

The absence of gingival bleeding is a clinically relevant endpoint since persistent bleeding sites are associated with a higher risk of periodontal and peri-implant disease progression that can lead to tooth or implant loss.26,27 Extensive evidence shows that SnF2 reduces gingival bleeding, with greater effects relative to dentifrice control groups as reported in multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses.12,17,18,28-30 One example is a meta-analysis which synthesized data from 18 randomized controlled trials representing nearly 3000 participants.12 Findings showed that among participants with baseline gingivitis, 68% of those who used gluconate-chelated SnF2 (e.g., gluconate was used to stabilize the SnF2 in those formulations) achieved healthy gingival status after less than three months of use; an outcome representing 3.7 times better odds of transitioning from a state of gingivitis to a state of gingival health compared to sodium fluoride or sodium monofluorophosphate toothpaste.12 Notably, bleeding sites were reduced by 51% among SnF2 users compared to participants using the negative control.12 This was further demonstrated in a separate pooled analysis of randomized, controlled clinical trials with up to six months of SnF2 use, which showed bleeding reduction as early as one month, increased by three months, and was maintained for six months.31 The consistent and sustained reduction in gingival bleeding observed with SnF2 use underscores its role as a practical, evidence-based intervention to improve gingival health and reduce periodontal and peri-implant diseases over time.

Plaque Coverage and Virulence

Stannous fluoride supports gingival health through two complementary plaque-related mechanisms, reinforcing the importance of effective daily plaque control. As part of a twice-daily toothbrushing routine, SnF2 dentifrice has been shown to significantly reduce plaque coverage.17,18 This benefit has been demonstrated in a pooled analysis of 44 long-term and short-term studies with over 3300 participants.21 Participants using SnF2 had significantly lower plaque coverage than positive and negative controls, even on unbrushed surfaces.21

Mechanistically, SnF2 acts on the plaque biofilm itself where it modifies microbial metabolism and reduces the abundance of inflammation-promoting bacteria.32-34

A 2024 investigation showed that SnF2 penetrates the outer membranes of Prevotella pallens and Porphyromonas gingivalis, two species known to be associated with gingivitis.33 In a dose-dependent manner, SnF2 precipitates were associated with membrane disintegration and reduced bacterial growth. A separate study similarly reported that biofilms treated in situ with a SnF2-based toothpaste had smaller counts of periopathogenic species, such as P. gingivalis, and increased counts of commensal species, like Streptococcus gordonii.34 Together these findings indicate a shift in the oral microbiome toward a composition consistent with gingival health. Importantly, separate research shows that this oral microbiome shift was still observed after three years of use, demonstrating its long-term positive effects.35

Stannous fluoride also modulates bacterial virulence and host inflammatory signaling, combining plaque control with virulence suppression. During acute gingival inflammation, host cells respond to bacterial challenge through specialized pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), called toll-like receptors (TLRs), which recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) expressed by pro-inflammatory bacteria. Activation of TLR signaling on epithelial and immune cells, including neutrophils and macrophages,4,36 initiates the recruitment of immune cells4,34 and the production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and interleukin-8 (IL-8).4,38,39 While these responses are critical for host defense, the effective and timely resolution of these inflammatory challenges prevents permanent damage to the periodontal and/or peri-implant apparatus.4,40

The reduction of the aforementioned virulence factors can protect the hard and soft tissues around teeth and dental implants. Plaque samples collected from participants who used a SnF2 toothpaste for four weeks showed significant reduction in TLR activation along with reductions in gram-negative, anaerobic bacteria.41 Furthermore, SnF2 targets outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), which are produced by gram-negative bacteria such as P. gingivalis. Outer membrane vesicles contain a variety of components responsible for modulating the host immune response, including gingipains, P. gingivalis peptidylarginine deiminases (PPADs), and LPS, thereby potentiating inflammation, oxidative stress, and epithelial tissue damage.42-44 Stannous fluoride can however bind to OMVs and reduce their infectivity and associated oxidative stress.44

Together, these mechanisms help maintain the sulcular epithelial barrier.24,25,44 In participants with gingivitis, twice-daily, two-month use of SnF2 toothpaste produced reductions in gingivitis and bleeding but also significantly increased salivary antioxidant capacity and decreased salivary markers of oxidative stress.23 Furthermore, among individuals with elevated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, as determined by C-reactive protein (CRP) and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) markers, both CRP and LDL were significantly reduced in saliva after treatment, highlighting the potential relevance of SnF2 for patients with these comorbidities.23 Controlling the overall bacterial load with the proper self-care system may lessen the inflammatory burden for different cardiac and metabolic conditions.

These findings highlight that SnF2 not only improves plaque control but favorably alters the biofilm and host response, resulting in clinically meaningful reductions in plaque, gingival inflammation, and bleeding. For the dental professional, this reinforces the value of introducing a twice-daily, well-formulated SnF2 dentifrice to enhance daily self-care, support long-term periodontal stability, and help in the management of patients at higher risk for systemic diseases.

Peri-Implant Mucositis

A SnF2 dentifrice also supports daily oral hygiene for dental implants. This is a critical need as more patients receive implant therapy for single tooth replacement and full-arch reconstruction,45 in addition to the peri-implant soft tissue complex, where parallel-oriented connective tissue fibers create a structurally vulnerable interface for biofilm infiltration. Disease at this interface can progress much faster, often exponentially, than around natural teeth.46 The incidence rate for peri-implant mucositis has been shown to be 53% within 20 years of function.47

A pilot study evaluated the effects of a SnF2 dentifrice among participants with osseointegrated dental implants presenting with peri-implant mucositis. After using SnF2 toothpaste twice-daily for four weeks, gingival inflammation and bleeding were significantly reduced. In addition, due to the previously described mechanisms, the oral microbiome shifted from one characteristic of disease toward that of no mucositis.48 Importantly, at a near-neutral pH, toothpastes with SnF2 are safe and recommended for use with titanium implants.49 Clinically, these findings reinforce the role of a SnF2-containing dentifrice as a practical adjunct in implant maintenance and primary prevention, offering dental hygienists an evidence-based tool to help control inflammation, stabilize the peri-implant microbiome, and reduce the risk of peri-implant disease progression.

Stannous Fluoride Formulation

The formulation of a SnF2 toothpaste is critical to its efficacy15,16 as well as controlling extrinsic staining.50-52 Divalent stannous ions are highly reactive, and it is challenging to formulate a toothpaste that retains antibacterial efficacy.15,16 Therefore, production to maximize the clinical benefits of SnF2 toothpaste requires careful optimization, and not all marketed SnF2 toothpastes should be considered equal. In a three-month comparison of toothpastes containing identical concentrations of SnF2, but formulated with different excipients, significant differences were seen in the number of bleeding sites reduced and in the gingivitis index score at 2, 4, and 12 weeks of use.15 Similarly, in a three-month comparison of three formulations with identical SnF2 concentration but different levels of SnF2 bioavailability, the high bioavailable SnF2 formulation showed the greatest significant bleeding site benefit over a negative control.16 Such differences are attributable to differences in inactive ingredients and formulation chemistry, which in turn impacts the stability and bioavailability of SnF2.

Hard Tissue Benefits

Stannous fluoride has also shifted the conversation on sensitivity relief. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have revealed the efficacy of SnF2 with respect to reducing dental hypersensitivity via durable, acid resistant, tubule occlusion, with statistically significant benefits observed relative to both positive and negative controls.19,20 In a recent publication of a randomized clinical trial, SnF2 toothpaste provided faster, more effective sensitivity relief compared to a potassium nitrate toothpaste.53 Significant benefits have also been observed for reduction of dental erosion, attributable to the formation of an acid-resistant layer that protects the enamel and exposed dentin from pH challenge.19,20

CONCLUSION

Stannous fluoride provides a range of soft and hard tissue benefits that improve oral health and have positive implications on systemic health. A simple switch to a modern SnF2 formulation, supported by decades of clinical research, falls within a daily oral hygiene habit already established by patients. For individuals who do not brush consistently, this remains one of the easiest and most accessible first steps toward improving their oral and overall health.

IMPLICATIONS FOR DENTAL HYGIENE PRACTICE

  • Oral diseases, particularly periodontal disease, are prevalent globally and have a negative impact on patients’ oral health, with potential systemic consequences.

  • As part of a person-centered approach to oral care, recommendations for over-the-counter products with therapeutic benefits can play a critical role in extending the benefits of mechanical oral hygiene habits.

  • Dental hygienists should consider recommending a well-formulated SnF2 toothpaste, when clinically indicated, as part of an easy-to-implement, evidence-based therapeutic product to improve and maintain periodontal and peri-implant health, protect hard tissues, and reduce the burden of oral and systemic inflammation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to thank Marisa DeNoble Loeffler, MS, for medical writing assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • NDHRA priority area, Client level; Oral health care (health promotion; treatments, behaviors, products).

  • DISCLOSURES

    Beth Jordan is an employee of The Procter & Gamble Company, a manufacturer of stannous fluoride dentifrice, and a member and fellow of the American Dental Hygienists’ Association. Adam Saltz is a consultant for Procter & Gamble. Medical writing assistance was funded by The Procter & Gamble Company.

  • Received April 30, 2026.
  • Accepted June 14, 2026.
  • Copyright © 2026 The American Dental Hygienists’ Association

This article is open access and may not be copied, distributed or modified without written permission from the American Dental Hygienists’ Association.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Loe H,
    2. Theilade E,
    3. Jensen SB.
    Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol (1930). 1965 May-Jun; 36:177–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Khan SA,
    2. Kong EF,
    3. Meiller TF, et al.
    Periodontal diseases: Bug induced, host promoted. PLoS Pathog. 2015 Jul 30; 11(7):e1004952.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.
    1. Benzian H,
    2. Williams D.
    editors. The challenge of oral disease-A call for global action. The Oral Health Atlas. 2nd ed. FDI World Dental Federation. Geneva; 2015. 22p.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Baima G,
    2. Arce M,
    3. Romandini M, et al.
    Inflammatory and immunological basis of periodontal diseases. J Periodontal Res. 2025 Oct 9; 1-34.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Huang S,
    2. He T,
    3. Yue F, et al.
    Longitudinal multi-omics and microbiome meta-analysis identify an asymptomatic gingival state that links gingivitis, periodontitis, and aging. mBio. 2021 Mar 9; 12(2):e03281-20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wu L,
    2. Huang CM,
    3. Wang Q, et al.
    Burden of severe periodontitis: new insights based on a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 31;25(1):861.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Perić M,
    2. Marhl U,
    3. Gennai S, et al.
    Treatment of gingivitis is associated with reduction of systemic inflammation and improvement of oral health-related quality of life: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2022 49(9):899–910.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. American Dental Hygienists’ Association
    . Standards for clinical dental hygiene practice [Internet]. Chicago (IL): American Dental Hygienists’ Association; 2025 Mar 20 [cited 2026 Apr 15]. Available from: https://www.adha.org/resources/standards/
  9. 9.↵
    1. Slot DE,
    2. Wiggelinkhuizen L,
    3. Rosema NA, et al.
    The efficacy of manual toothbrushes following a brushing exercise: A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2012 Aug;10(3):187-97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Deinzer R,
    2. Ebel S,
    3. Blättermann H, et al.
    Toothbrushing: to the best of one’s abilities is possibly not good enough. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):167.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Figuero E,
    2. Roldán S,
    3. Serrano J, et al.
    Efficacy of adjunctive therapies in patients with gingival inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jul;47 Suppl 22:125-143.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Biesbrock A,
    2. He T,
    3. DiGennaro J, et al.
    The effects of bioavailable gluconate chelated stannous fluoride dentifrice on gingival bleeding: Meta-analysis of eighteen randomized controlled trials. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Dec; 46(12):1205-16.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. FDA
    . Anti-caries drug products for over-the-counter human use; final monograph [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2023 [cited 2026 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-D/part-355
  14. 14.↵
    1. IFDH
    . 2019 toothpaste survey [Internet]. Rockville (MD): International Federation of Dental Hygienists; 2019 [cited 2026 Apr 2]. Available from: https://ifdh.org/ifdh-2019-toothpaste-survey/
  15. 15.↵
    1. He T,
    2. Nachnani S,
    3. Lee S, et al.
    The relative clinical efficacy of three 0.454% stannous fluoride dentifrices for the treatment of gingivitis over 3 months. Am J Dent. 2020 Aug; 33(4):218-24.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. He T,
    2. Grender J,
    3. Zou Y, et al.
    A 3-month randomized trial evaluating the effects of stannous fluoride bioavailability on gingivitis. Am J Dent. 2025 Jun; 38(3):155-60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Valkenburg C,
    2. Van der Weijden FA,
    3. Slot DE.
    Plaque control and reduction of gingivitis: the evidence for dentifrices. Periodontol 2000. 2019 Feb; 79(1):221-32.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Johannsen A,
    2. Emilson CG,
    3. Johannsen G, et al.
    Effects of stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice on dental calculus, dental plaque, gingivitis, halitosis and stain: A systematic review. Heliyon. 2019 Dec 9; 5(12):e02850.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Konradsson K,
    2. Lingström P,
    3. Emilson CG, et al.
    Stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice in relation to dental caries, dental erosion and dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review. Am J Dent. 2020 Apr; 33(2):95-105.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. West NX,
    2. He T,
    3. Zou Y, et al.
    Bioavailable gluconate chelated stannous fluoride toothpaste meta-analyses: effects on dentine hypersensitivity and enamel erosion. J Dent. 2021 Feb; 105:103566.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. He T,
    2. Zou Y,
    3. DiGennaro J,
    4. Biesbrock AR.
    Novel findings on anti-plaque effects of stannous fluoride. Am J Dent. 2022 Dec; 35(6):297–307.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Cannon M,
    2. Khambe D,
    3. Klukowska M, et al.
    Clinical effects of stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice in reducing plaque microbial virulence II: metabonomic changes. J Clin Dent. 2018 Mar; 29(1):1-12.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ramji N,
    2. Xie S,
    3. Bunger A, et al.
    Effects of stannous fluoride dentifrice on gingival health and oxidative stress markers: a prospective clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 30; 24(1):1019.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Haught C,
    2. Xie S,
    3. Circello B, et al.
    Lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid virulence deactivation by stannous fluoride. J Clin Dent. 2016 Sep; 27(3):84-9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Xie S,
    2. Haught JC,
    3. Tansky CS, et al.
    Clinical effects of stannous fluoride dentifrice in reducing plaque microbial virulence III: Lipopolysaccharide and TLR2 reporter cell gene activation. Am J Dent. 2018 Aug;31(4):215-224.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Chapple ILC,
    2. Mealey BL,
    3. Van Dyke TE, et al.
    Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S74–S84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Schätzle M,
    2. Löe H,
    3. Bürgin W, et al.
    Clinical course of chronic periodontitis. I. Role of gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Oct;30(10):887-901. Erratum in: J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Sep;31(9):813.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Clark-Perry D,
    2. Levin L.
    Comparison of new formulas of stannous fluoride toothpastes with other commercially available fluoridated toothpastes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int Dent J. 2020 Dec; 70(6):418-26.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.
    1. Gunsolley JC.
    A meta-analysis of six-month studies of antiplaque and antigingivitis agents. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Dec; 137(12):1649-57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Paraskevas S,
    2. van der Weijden GA.
    A review of the effects of stannous fluoride on gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2006 Jan; 33(1):1-13.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. He T,
    2. Grender J,
    3. Farrell S,
    4. Biesbrock AR.
    Relationship between 1-, 3-, and 6-month gingival bleeding outcomes. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2024 Jul; 9(3):286-93.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Hu P,
    2. Xie S,
    3. Shi B, et al.
    The effect of oral care product ingredients on oral pathogenic bacteria transcriptomics through RNA-Seq. Microorganisms. 2024 Dec 23; 12(12):2668.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Xie S,
    2. Iberi V,
    3. Boissy Y, et al.
    Stannous fluoride forms aggregates between outer and inner membranes leading to membrane rupture of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella pallens. Front Oral Health. 2024 Jun 26; 5:1427008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Chen D,
    2. Chew D,
    3. Xiang Q, et al.
    Interactions and effects of a stannous-containing sodium fluoride dentifrice on oral pathogens and the oral microbiome. Front Microbiol. 2024 Feb 15; 15:1327913.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Kruse AB,
    2. Schlueter N,
    3. Kortmann VK, et al.
    Long-term use of oral hygiene products containing stannous and fluoride ions: Effect on viable salivary bacteria. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Apr 22;10(5):481.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Netea MG,
    2. Balkwill F,
    3. Chonchol M, et al.
    A guiding map for inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2017 Jul 19;18(8):826-31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.
    1. Takeuchi O,
    2. Akira S.
    Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell. 2010 Mar 19; 140(6):805–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Chen L,
    2. Deng H,
    3. Cui H, et al.
    Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs. Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 14; 9(6):7204-18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Turner MD,
    2. Nedjai B,
    3. Hurst T, et al.
    Cytokines and chemokines: At the crossroads of cell signalling and inflammatory disease. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2014 Nov; 1843(11):2563-82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Fullerton JN,
    2. Gilroy DW.
    Resolution of inflammation: a new therapeutic frontier. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016 Aug; 15(8):551-67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Klukowska M,
    2. Haught JC,
    3. Xie S, et al.
    Clinical effects of stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice in reducing plaque microbial virulence I: Microbiological and receptor cell findings. J Clin Dent. 2017 Jun; 28(2):16-26.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Charpentier LA,
    2. Dolben EF,
    3. Hendricks MR, et al.
    Bacterial outer membrane vesicles and immune modulation of the host. Membranes (Basel). 2023 Aug 24; 13(9):752.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.
    1. Zhang Z,
    2. Liu D,
    3. Liu S, et al.
    The role of Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles in periodontal disease and related systemic diseases. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Jan 28; 10:585917.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Xie S,
    2. Tansky CS,
    3. Ashe J, et al.
    Stannous fluoride protects gingival keratinocytes against infection and oxidative stress by Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles. Front Dent Med. 2024 Nov 19; 5:1492369.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Elani HW,
    2. Starr JR,
    3. Da Silva JD,
    4. Gallucci GO.
    Trends in dental implant use in the U.S., 1999-2016, and projections to 2026. J Dent Res. 2018 Dec;97(13):1424-30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Rokaya D,
    2. Srimaneepong V,
    3. Wisitrasameewon W, et al.
    , Peri-implantitis update: Risk indicators, diagnosis, and treatment. Eur J Dent. 2020 Oct;14(4):672-82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Galarraga-Vinueza ME,
    2. Pagni S,
    3. Finkelman M, et al.
    Prevalence, incidence, systemic, behavioral, and patient-related risk factors and indicators for peri-implant diseases: An AO/AAP systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2025;96:587–633.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Klukowska M,
    2. Ramji N,
    3. Muñoz Bodnar A, et al.
    Clinical effects of stannous fluoride dentifrice on peri-implant mucositis, plaque microbiome, and oxidative stress. Am J Dent. 2025 Apr; 38(2):59-66.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Suszcynsky-Meister E,
    2. Shauchuk A,
    3. Hare T, et al.
    Chemical effects of stannous and sodium fluoride dental treatments on titanium alloy surfaces. In: Dental materials: metal-based materials and other materials. 2018 AADR/CADR Annual Meeting; 2018 Mar 23; Fort Lauderdale (FL). [Internet]: c2026 [cited 2026 Apr 2]. Available from: https://iadr.abstractarchives.com/abstract/47am-2855013/chemical-effects-of-stannous-and-sodium-fluoride-dental-treatments-on-titanium-alloy-surfaces
  50. 50.↵
    1. Schiff T,
    2. Saletta L,
    3. Baker RA, et al.
    Anticalculus efficacy and safety of a stabilized stannous fluoride/sodium hexametaphosphate dentifrice. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005 Sep;26(9 Suppl 1):29-34.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  51. 51.
    1. Baig A,
    2. He T,
    3. Buisson J, et al.
    Extrinsic whitening effects of sodium hexametaphosphate--a review including a dentifrice with stabilized stannous fluoride. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005 Sep;26(9 Suppl 1):47-53.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Sensabaugh C,
    2. Sagel ME.
    Stannous fluoride dentifrice with sodium hexametaphosphate: Review of laboratory, clinical and practice-based data. J Dent Hyg. 2009 Spring;83(2):70-8. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Biesbrock AR,
    2. He T,
    3. Zou Y, et al.
    Randomized clinical trial evaluating kinetic benefits of desensitizing agents: Magnitude, onset, and stability of relief. J Periodontol. 2025 Dec;96(12):1339-1351.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Dental Hygienists' Association
Vol. 100, Issue 4
August 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Dental Hygiene.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Stannous Fluoride Toothpaste: Improving gingival health without a new habit adoption
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Dental Hygiene
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Dental Hygiene web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Stannous Fluoride Toothpaste: Improving gingival health without a new habit adoption
Beth A. Jordan, Adam E. Saltz
American Dental Hygienists' Association Aug 2026, 100 (4) 68-74;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Stannous Fluoride Toothpaste: Improving gingival health without a new habit adoption
Beth A. Jordan, Adam E. Saltz
American Dental Hygienists' Association Aug 2026, 100 (4) 68-74;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Similar Articles

More in this TOC Section

  • Biological Dental Hygiene: Principles, educational pathways, and clinical practice considerations
  • Opportunities and Challenges of Mentoring and Developing Student Reading Comprehension, Writing, and Research Synthesis at the Undergraduate Level
Show more Short Report

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • stannous fluoride
  • oral hygiene
  • toothpaste
  • anti-gingivitis
  • periodontal disease
  • dental implants
  • prevention
  • dentinal hypersensitivity

About

  • About ADHA
  • About JDH
  • JDH Reviewers
  • Contact Us

Helpful Links

  • Submit a Paper
  • Author Guidelines
  • Permissions
  • FAQs

More Information

  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • Help

ISSN #: 1553-0205

Copyright © 2026 American Dental Hygienists’ Association

Powered by HighWire