Oral medicine
Inhibition of Candida albicans biofilm formation on denture material

Abstract presented at the American Association for Dental Research Annual session, Orlando, Florida, March 6, 2006.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.01.021Get rights and content

Objective

The aim was to determine the ability of several thin-film polymer formulations, with and without incorporated antifungals, to inhibit Candida albicans biofilm growth on denture material. The inhibition of C. albicans biofilms on maxillary dentures could play a significant role in preventing the development of denture stomatitis.

Study design

Low-porosity and high-porosity thin-film polymer formulations were used and one of the following fungicides was added: 1) chlorhexidine diacetate at 1.0%; 2) nystatin at 1.0%; or 3) amphotericin B at 0.1%. These coatings were placed on rectangular (12 × 10 mm) dental resin material samples. A subset of the coated dental materials were brushed to simulate denture cleaning for 1 minute per day for 1 year. Candida albicans biofilms were formed on polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) specimens placed in 24-well polystyrene plates, and the extent of biofilm formation on coated and noncoated specimens was assessed using a 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfo-phenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide (XTT) reduction assay.

Results

Thin-film polymer PMMA coatings alone, without an antifungal agent, produced a small significant reduction in C. albicans biofilm formation compared with control PMMA. However, incorporation of antifungal medications into the thin-film polymer reduced biofilm formation between 70% and 80% with nystatin, and between 50% and 60% with amphotericin B. Biofilm reduction with chlorhexidine (up to 98%) was significantly greater than all other formulations tested (P < .025).

Conclusion

This novel thin-film coating with various antifungals effectively inhibits C. albicans biofilm formation and should be evaluated as a potential preventive therapy for denture stomatitis.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

We decided to evaluate 2 variations of the polymer formula by altering porosity. On one hand we felt that the more porous material may provide an improved substrate for biofilm growth. On the other hand, we wanted to determine if higher porosity increased the ability of antifungals to inhibit biofilm growth. The formulations were designated “low porosity” and “high porosity.” Rectangular (12 × 10 mm) dental material (DM) samples were prepared by pouring a mixture of 1 part Dentsply Repair

Results

Fig 1 shows the biofilm inhibition of the thin-film polymer formulas alone after the brushing test was applied. There was >20% inhibition of biofilm formation with the high-porosity film but virtually no inhibition with the low-porosity film. This difference was statistically significant (P < .005).

Fig 2 shows biofilm inhibition of both thin-film polymer formulas with medications after brushing. All 3 medications showed >50% improvement over the thin film alone. However, both chlorhexidine

Discussion

The thin-film polymer appears to inhibit biofilm formation when applied without antifungal medications. Porosity of this formula appears to be significant, with the high-porosity formula showing significant inhibition of biofilm formation. We were surprised at this finding, because we thought that a more porous substrate would promote biofilm formation. However, the thin-film polymer surface even of the high-porosity formula is much less porous than PMMA, so this porosity may be too small to

References (12)

  • J.B. Epstein

    Antifungal therapy in oropharyngeal mycotic infections

    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod

    (1990)
  • G. Ramage et al.

    Denture stomatitis: a role for Candida biofilms

    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod

    (2004)
  • E. Budtz-Jorgensen et al.

    Denture stomatitis IThe etiology in relation to trauma and infection

    Acta Odontol Scand

    (1970)
  • T.M. Arendorf et al.

    Denture Stomatitis: a review

    J Oral Rehab

    (1987)
  • E. Budtz-Jorgensen

    Etiology, pathogenesis, therapy, and prophylaxis of oral yeast infections

    Acta Odontol Scand

    (1990)
  • E. Martin-Mazuelos et al.

    Response to fluconazole and itraconazole of Candida spp. in denture stomatitis

    Mycoses

    (1996)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (113)

  • Fracture strength of Er,Yag laser treated PMMA denture-based polymer (DBP) colonized with C. albicans, S. aureus, S.mutans, and E.coli

    2022, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Silva and their colleagues found 2% CHX to be effective in disinfecting PMMA denture bases. Also, Redding et al. deduced analogous results [44]. However, the effect of CHX is dependent on the pH of the environment and the manifestation of organic matter [15].

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by an International Association for Dental Research/Glaxo Smith Kline Innovation in Oral Care Award in 2004 to the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio and Biomedical Development Corporation.

1

B. Bhatt is a former employee and G. Siegel is a current employee and officer of Biomedical Development Corporation

2

S. Redding and R. Rawls have participated as investigators on several Small Business Innovation Research grants to Biomedical Development Corporation.

View full text